cc_star Posted 24 March 2012 Posted 24 March 2012 Is wasn't dangerous.. his studs were not up. If Danns should have had a red then so should the Hull player. Possibly, but Danns should have gone... Pelts was lucky too as many players get a red for pushing their forehead in someone's face which he did.
LcFc_Smiv Posted 24 March 2012 Posted 24 March 2012 Is wasn't dangerous.. his studs were not up. If Danns should have had a red then so should the Hull player. Two feet off the ground, doesn't matter how you argue it, the rules state it's a sending off.
Guest shearfox Posted 24 March 2012 Posted 24 March 2012 Well if your good you get the points like we did today....
Matt Posted 24 March 2012 Posted 24 March 2012 Exactly the response you should get once a player gets sent off - you dig in and work harder. Makes the game harder don't get me wrong but it seems many times whether a referee makes the correct (Which it seemed like he did today although certain fans still prefer to blame the ref) or the wrong decision the players have and excuse, give up, think what is the point, feel hard done by and sorry for themselves - like many fans. Wrong - If a referee makes a decision whether it be right or wrong you dig in like we did today, get on with it.
FrankieADZ Posted 24 March 2012 Posted 24 March 2012 I know we seem to get alot of shit refs...they seem to coming to the KP like pigs on sh*t. But in a way, I think it makes us dig in...wanting to shove it down his throat.
Burmesefox Posted 26 March 2012 Author Posted 26 March 2012 Danns was defoe a red - no two ways about it. Wreckless, two footed, in the air and over the ball. No complaints there.
Simmo86 Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 Danns was defoe a red - no two ways about it. Wreckless, two footed, in the air and over the ball. No complaints there. Jermain?
ousefox Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 So which home game was it recently, where the ball bounced up in the area and hit Marshall's wayward hand. No pen but could easily have been given against us. We were only one up or drawing at the time, decision went for us but no one remembered it. And that's just one pro city decision I remember. Not a penalty, not a deliberate handball.
FuriousFox46 Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 Referees have been poorer than usual. But we've cost ourselves more points than they have. Only gripe I have, is with Jon Moss and the Forest game. Red card? Is it fvck?!
Libertine Dream Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 Referees have been poorer than usual. But we've cost ourselves more points than they have. Only gripe I have, is with Jon Moss and the Forest game. Red card? Is it fvck?! The penalty decision was worse
FuriousFox46 Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 The penalty decision was worse I loathe that man. I get angry just thinking about that game!
Libertine Dream Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 I loathe that man. I get angry just thinking about that game! And now he refs in the Premier League, no wonder our league's and national teams are struggling when the referees/the FA are ruining the game to the extent they are
dannythefox Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 People say the decisions do even themselves out over the season so if that's correct we should only get good ones from now till the end.
AKCJ Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 My mates the ref for the Hull match tomorrow... What has he said about Danns' red card?
Mission Unlikely Promotion Posted 26 March 2012 Posted 26 March 2012 Bad defending & poor concentration has cost us more than anything this season. This
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.