Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
ozleicester

Food or Sex? - Poll

Food or Sex?  

68 members have voted

  1. 1. Its friday evening, the weekend beckons and you can have a few hours of passionate sex...or an evening of gourmet food and wine - your choice is???

    • Food
      12
    • Sex
      43
    • a three hour session on foxestalk arguing about racism/vegetarianism/wellens
      13


Recommended Posts

Posted

Both, take your woman out for some fine dining then after letting it go down behave like the animal you just ate in the bedroom.

It's a pointless questions coming from a vegetarian mind, having a fine meal to them is like having sex with a tunnel for normal folk, I remember reading a report that they generally have smaller penises than meat eaters as well.

Given a straight choice it's a tough one, if if it was someone I'd wanted to have sex with for years then I'd probably go for the later, if not what Moosebreath described sounds perfect.

An oak room with a log fire, a cocktail for starters, followed by a mixed grill or a lamb shank for the main course followed by a dessert, a lovely bottle of red with the meat and maybe a Henessey to wash it down with while you relax for 15-20 after the meal.

Guest BlueBrett
Posted

Very much depends on who cooked the food and who the sex is with. If I could have my pick of any meal and any woman I'd blatantly go for the woman. It would be on the condition that she left immediately afterwards though.

Posted

Reminds me of the old gag about the old guy who was asked by a young lady if he fancied some super sex .

He replied " I'll have the soup please"

Posted

Very much depends on who cooked the food and who the sex is with. If I could have my pick of any meal and any woman I'd blatantly go for the woman. It would be on the condition that she left immediately afterwards though.

I don't think she would argue.

Guest BlueBrett
Posted
I don't think she would argue.

You'd think not but they never usually do. The last couple have hung around for years :nono:

Posted

I remember reading a report that they generally have smaller penises than meat eaters as well.

Not surprised by this at all. Small penises, thin wrists, child bearing hips, narrow shoulders and quiet high pitched voices. Weak and feeble bodies to go with their weak and feeble minds.

Posted

Now that's really, really tough.

Promotion everyday of the week. Sex is sex even with Kate upton lol I'll still spiff all the same. But Leicester's promotion will be the single best thing since before I started sexing lol.

Posted

Not surprised by this at all. Small penises, thin wrists, child bearing hips, narrow shoulders and quiet high pitched voices. Weak and feeble bodies to go with their weak and feeble minds.

what do you think to the change in the Australian definition of misogyny moose?

Posted

what do you think to the change in the Australian definition of misogyny moose?

Much like 'racism' it's a word which has seen its scope broaden to the point where you often hear it used to describe events which don't come close to the original meaning of the word. So I suppose updating the definition to take this into account makes sense.

what do you think to the change in the Australian definition of misogyny moose?

Much like 'racism' it's a word which has seen its scope broaden to the point where you often hear it used to describe events which don't come close to the original meaning of the word. So I suppose updating the definition to take this into account makes sense.

Posted

Much like 'racism' it's a word which has seen its scope broaden to the point where you often hear it used to describe events which don't come close to the original meaning of the word. So I suppose updating the definition to take this into account makes sense.

Posted

Both, take your woman out for some fine dining then after letting it go down behave like the animal you just ate in the bedroom.

It's a pointless questions coming from a vegetarian mind, having a fine meal to them is like having sex with a tunnel for normal folk, I remember reading a report that they generally have smaller penises than meat eaters as well.

Given a straight choice it's a tough one, if if it was someone I'd wanted to have sex with for years then I'd probably go for the later, if not what Moosebreath described sounds perfect.

An oak room with a log fire, a cocktail for starters, followed by a mixed grill or a lamb shank for the main course followed by a dessert, a lovely bottle of red with the meat and maybe a Henessey to wash it down with while you relax for 15-20 after the meal.

I knew it.

Posted

Just being home from work by 6pm on a Friday would be nice. :/

In answer to the question I guess it depends on whether it's mind-blowing sex vs average food; or awesomely impressive food vs average sex. :D

Posted

The question is all wrong, you are comparing a fine dining experience, with sex, the problem is you have not defined the sex, now those with long term partners with regular sexy time, sex is like a nice home cooked meal of your favourite comfort food, great, but not to be compared to a night out at a top restaurant, where your every need is catered for.

So you have to compare eating out, with "eating out" setting aside any moral objections, the question should be a meal at a top restaurant 6 courses, the finest wine and whiskey, or a night of depravity at your local high class brothel, where you get 6 courses, all your favourites are there, but prepared to perfection, and somethings you have never tried before, you can even have 2 courses at the same time, and you don't have to do any of the washing up afterwards.

I would take the sex.

Posted

The question is all wrong, you are comparing a fine dining experience, with sex, the problem is you have not defined the sex, now those with long term partners with regular sexy time, sex is like a nice home cooked meal of your favourite comfort food, great, but not to be compared to a night out at a top restaurant, where your every need is catered for.

So you have to compare eating out, with "eating out" setting aside any moral objections, the question should be a meal at a top restaurant 6 courses, the finest wine and whiskey, or a night of depravity at your local high class brothel, where you get 6 courses, all your favourites are there, but prepared to perfection, and somethings you have never tried before, you can even have 2 courses at the same time, and you don't have to do any of the washing up afterwards.

I would take the sex.

Can you now cmpare the FT experience in the same way?

Posted

Nope.

Not even the variety of a thread with Zing, Daggers and Moose in it?

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...