chavdonk Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 Knockaert and Marshall are playmakers, however NP only seems to let Knockaert have any freedom on the pitch, either that or he just does it anyway whilst Marshall has been told to be a defensive winger, why NP has told him that i will never know a defensive winger is surely a full back or am I missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grewks Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 If we had a player of the N'Daw type (not him because he is w**k). Players like marshall would be given more freedom, rather than a large defensive responsibility which he referred to after the blackburn game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_lcfc_85 Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 I don't believe we need this sort of player, we,re not conceding many goals so pointless. Matt james can do that role but he is injured so be patient. This old physical presence centre mid is getting boring now, not every side has one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJB-fox Posted 3 March 2013 Author Share Posted 3 March 2013 Good post. I would take sako from Wolves always looks a threat. Agree with this completely, must be out of favour too if hes been allowed to join wolves on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJB-fox Posted 3 March 2013 Author Share Posted 3 March 2013 No thanks. If youd bothered to read on i stated that we couldve picked up players that were good on the ball, such as meyler or trotter, moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 If we had a player of the N'Daw type (not him because he is w**k). Players like marshall would be given more freedom, rather than a large defensive responsibility which he referred to after the blackburn game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_lcfc_85 Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 If we had a player of the N'Daw type (not him because he is w**k). Players like marshall would be given more freedom, rather than a large defensive responsibility which he referred to after the blackburn game Just changing the formation would enable that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 He's the sort of player this forum would moan about because of his lack of ability on the ball if he joined us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_lcfc_85 Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 He's the sort of player this forum would moan about because of his lack of ability on the ball if he joined us. I'd support him if he came and Hopefully he'd do well but we don't need him, defensively we are the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJB-fox Posted 3 March 2013 Author Share Posted 3 March 2013 All the guys saying they wouldnt want n'Daw, im not suggesting him but im suggesting we should get a more technical version of him, to suit our style of play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Dream Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 But our failure is we can't score away from home, we've conceded the least away from home so I wouldn't consider it a priority. We need a true playmaker/attacking midfielder. Marshall could play there but somebody like Powell might be ideal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number 6 Posted 3 March 2013 Share Posted 3 March 2013 We've got a Hoolahan type and we play him right midfield. Fair point. Don't think knocks is quite at that level yet though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 He was big and clumsy, physical and got In our players faces. On the wrong day he's a walking time bomb, gives away too many fouls. Didn't see him make any telling contribution to their play. Certainly a player you need when you're in Ipswich's current position but not one that a promotion chasing team should be looking at. We have got ourselves in a great league position without a so called midfield enforcer, largely through playing to our strengths and one that N'Daw wouldn't really fit into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambert09 Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 I'm pretty sure Danny drinkwaters main presence in the team is to break down opposing attacks and start ours. If he has a bad game we do IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingfox Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 We need Trotter or Bridcutt. That's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 Said similar after the Millwall defeat... http://www.theposthorngallop.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/run-of-mill-jamie-barnard-on-how-defeat.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpjfox Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 I agree JB not necessarily to play every game but certainly games where we could/or have been bullied in that area Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pazzerfox Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 'Give them possession and they are supreme, give them altercation and they are subdued. It is in times like these that Pearson needs that extra midfield dimension'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdwith2beaksandnofriends Posted 4 March 2013 Share Posted 4 March 2013 'Give them possession and they are supreme, give them altercation and they are subdued. It is in times like these that Pearson needs that extra midfield dimension'. That's pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.