Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
fuchsntf

huddersfield goals Video

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think James shot is pretty deceptive. Not convinced it crosses the line in all honesty. Happens too fast.

Me niether. In real time it looks like it did comfortably, which is weird-but the replays suggest otherwise.

Posted

Just watching those highlights...

 

 

 

James' crossbar shot does actually cross the line.

Looks like it actually hits bang on the line

post-19131-0-32161300-1398602031_thumb.j

Posted

It does hit the line on the line, but it got me thinking...

Perhaps somebody more scientifically minded than I could explain whether it is possible (within the realms of a shot which could realistically occur) for a ball to hit the underside of the bar, cross the line whilst still in the air and then hit the line when it lands and bounce out?

Understandably all people seem to look for is what happens when the ball lands, but obviously it doesn't matter whether the ball is in the air or on the ground - if it's in it's in.

Posted

It does hit the line on the line, but it got me thinking...

Perhaps somebody more scientifically minded than I could explain whether it is possible (within the realms of a shot which could realistically occur) for a ball to hit the underside of the bar, cross the line whilst still in the air and then hit the line when it lands and bounce out?

Understandably all people seem to look for is what happens when the ball lands, but obviously it doesn't matter whether the ball is in the air or on the ground - if it's in it's in.

 

Don't think so. It'd curl inwards rather than outwards.

 

Think of free-kick takers  and how they get the ball to move.

Posted

Don't think so. It'd curl inwards rather than outwards.

Think of free-kick takers and how they get the ball to move.

No offence Harry but I was looking for something a little more scientific than that.

I think you're probably right.

Posted

it's all to do with the angular momentum of the ball along the x and y axis in relation to the rotational direction of the ball on it's own axis.

Posted

Just watching those highlights...

 

 

 

James' crossbar shot does actually cross the line.

Thanks for posting the goals, my streaming kept breaking up, so I seen alot but 'sods law' kept intervening.

So for this weekend Andy king has a break and you get to handle the crown jewels, (take that how you like..)

James crossbar shot..A German friend called me, hes bit of a geek, so he put it through a program he has at work.

He couldnt show me or send it, or post it into this site, but he confirms NO goal, not over the line, he did 3 quick graphs.

he says, from the 3 virtual angles he made up, the best he could give ,on the line leaning towards goal but still on the line.

The other 2 ,tendence just before the line. And cos like we cant forget the war, he cant forget 66, so he says it was a Wembly

Goal, with the right descision this time.

Mind you he wasnt even born then......Just met up for a beer..

Then I shot him, ............unfortunately, only with a sweet paper flicked from my fingers

Posted

Shame the highlights don't show the build up to the first goal. As i recall, we hit them on the break with 3 or 4 players making nice touches before it even came through to Dyer.

Posted

It does hit the line on the line, but it got me thinking...

Perhaps somebody more scientifically minded than I could explain whether it is possible (within the realms of a shot which could realistically occur) for a ball to hit the underside of the bar, cross the line whilst still in the air and then hit the line when it lands and bounce out?

Understandably all people seem to look for is what happens when the ball lands, but obviously it doesn't matter whether the ball is in the air or on the ground - if it's in it's in.

I would guess The obscene amount of rotational spin required to make it happen would not be possible for a human being

Posted

Thanks for posting the goals, my streaming kept breaking up, so I seen alot but 'sods law' kept intervening.

So for this weekend Andy king has a break and you get to handle the crown jewels, (take that how you like..)

James crossbar shot..A German friend called me, hes bit of a geek, so he put it through a program he has at work.

He couldnt show me or send it, or post it into this site, but he confirms NO goal, not over the line, he did 3 quick graphs.

he says, from the 3 virtual angles he made up, the best he could give ,on the line leaning towards goal but still on the line.

The other 2 ,tendence just before the line. And cos like we cant forget the war, he cant forget 66, so he says it was a Wembly

Goal, with the right descision this time.

Mind you he wasnt even born then......Just met up for a beer..

Then I shot him, ............unfortunately, only with a sweet paper flicked from my fingers

Ha ha. You should mention to him that if the ref gave the handball that led to their equaliser then we wouldn't have needed extra time.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...