EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Ronny would want a lot more wages, also Pearson wants Cambiasso How do you know he wants a lot more wages? His still a free transfer. I'm talking hypothetically because people were quick to judge his age etc but soon as we got linked with cambiasso opinions changed
Haydos Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 I've got feeling this deal won't happen, if had wanted to come he would have been here by now. But why the delay?, its not like he's with a club or anything he's a free agent. I can't imagine Nigel wanting to be pissed around with this deal any longer. Fingers crossed i'm wrong and the deal is done soon. Not having a club is pretty irrelevant, the only thing that would as is negotiating a transfer fee. I can't think fo anything else. As betts mentioned, there's a whole load of factors involved.
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Ronny has spent more time in the last 5 years with his face buried in snatch than he has winning medals on the pitch. That's the difference. Its also the reason I'd take him too. #gwonron
Haydos Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 A few weeks ago I put a post out suggesting if you'd have ronaldinho at lcfc and the majority said they wouldn't have him as he was 'too old' or 'past it' Now we've been linked with Cambiasso everyone wants him on board, Ronny is the same age, more accolades, more clubs and international titles and was worth a hell of a lot more than cambiasso. What's the difference? Attitute and risk. Well known to have a huge problem with his professionalism.
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Ronny has spent more time in the last 5 years with his face buried in snatch than he has winning medals on the pitch. That's the difference. Its also the reason I'd take him too. #gwonron Probs best to not tell him well have fanni in the dressing room soon then
Out Foxed Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 His sorted them out now he has he's someone has already explained this to you. are you being willfully ignorant?
Beliall Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 How do you know he wants a lot more wages? His still a free transfer. I'm talking hypothetically because people were quick to judge his age etc but soon as we got linked with cambiasso opinions changed Its generally agreed on here we are short of midfielders and could use a DM. Cambiasso is one of the best in the business, it doesnt matter if he has lost a yard of pace in that position, his experience and reading of the game will be better with every year hes played. Maybe he saw what happened to konch and wants his hair back?
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 he has he's someone has already explained this to you. are you being willfully ignorant? Yep
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Yep To really fvck s**t up I might stop leaving out apostrophes, comma's and full stops too
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Attitute and risk. Well known to have a huge problem with his professionalism. What risk? Don't all South Americans have abit of an attitude problem?
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Its generally agreed on here we are short of midfielders and could use a DM. Cambiasso is one of the best in the business, it doesnt matter if he has lost a yard of pace in that position, his experience and reading of the game will be better with every year hes played. Maybe he saw what happened to konch and wants his hair back? We are a little short at the minute in central midfield but also short attacking too, was knocky full fit on sat? Albrighton out, Vardy out. Maybe we should bring konch to the negotiation table
Raw Dykes Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 To really fvck s**t up I might stop leaving out apostrophes, comma's and full stops too Well you could have left that apostrophe out for a start. For those who don't know, you never use an apostrophe for a plural (apostrophes, commas, balls, etc.). They're for missing letters (don't, can't, he's, etc.) and when something is owned by someone (Cambiasso's cue ball head).
BigMicky Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Well you could have left that apostrophe out for a start. For those who don't know, you never use an apostrophe for a plural (apostrophes, commas, balls, etc.). They're for missing letters (don't, can't, he's, etc.) and when something is owned by someone (Cambiasso's cue ball head). Good post. Can you also advise folk on the correct use of brought and bought please. Gets my goat.
TrentFox Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 To really fvck s**t up I might stop leaving out apostrophes, comma's and full stops too If I thought you had meant it, I'd suggest that post was brilliant!
TrentFox Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Good post. Can you also advise folk on the correct use of brought and bought please. Gets my goat. And given our likely results this season, surely this is the year we nail the difference between lose and loose??
Raw Dykes Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Good post. Can you also advise folk on the correct use of brought and bought please. Gets my goat.Thanks. Ok. Same here.Brought is the past tense of bring. You brought things with you that you didn't necessarily hand over any money for. "I brought my kids with me to the beach. If I'd have bought them, there'd be something very wrong." Bought is the past tense of buy. You bought things with money that you didn't necessarily take anywhere with you. "I bought my car insurance online. I haven't brought it anywhere, because that wouldn't make any fvcking sense." Next week, how to pronounce the letter H. (Spoilers! It's "aitch". Not fvcking "haitch". Alright? Stop saying fvcking "haitch". There's no such fvcking letter.) I'll just go and have a lie down now.
The Doctor Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 A few weeks ago I put a post out suggesting if you'd have ronaldinho at lcfc and the majority said they wouldn't have him as he was 'too old' or 'past it' Now we've been linked with Cambiasso everyone wants him on board, Ronny is the same age, more accolades, more clubs and international titles and was worth a hell of a lot more than cambiasso. What's the difference? Ronaldinho is a maverick who really let himself go a few years back, Cambiasso meanwhile was still playing at the top level regularly last season.
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Ronaldinho is a maverick who really let himself go a few years back, Cambiasso meanwhile was still playing at the top level regularly last season. Is there really that much of a difference between the Italian and Brazilian league? Ronny was still being selected for Brazilian squad in 2013 too.
artursteppe Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Thanks. Ok. Same here. Brought is the past tense of bring. You brought things with you that you didn't necessarily hand over any money for. "I brought my kids with me to the beach. If I'd have bought them, there'd be something very wrong." Bought is the past tense of buy. You bought things with money that you didn't necessarily take anywhere with you. "I bought my car insurance online. I haven't brought it anywhere, because that wouldn't make any fvcking sense." Next week, how to pronounce the letter H. (Spoilers! It's "aitch". Not fvcking "haitch". Alright? Stop saying fvcking "haitch". There's no such fvcking letter.) I'll just go and have a lie down now. Marvelous. What about "would of", "could of" and "should of". They really get my head caving in!
The Doctor Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Is there really that much of a difference between the Italian and Brazilian league? Ronny was still being selected for Brazilian squad in 2013 too. Yes. The Italian league is still a very strong league - it's not quite on the level of the premiership or la liga, but it is still a very high level league. I can't believe how many times I've had to say that.
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Yes. The Italian league is still a very strong league - it's not quite on the level of the premiership or la liga, but it is still a very high level league. I can't believe how many times I've had to say that. I've not compared it to prem, la liga etc I mean between Italian and Brazilian, both leagues have 3/4 good teams and apart from that has a pretty poor standard with a slow tempo
Kitchandro Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Fourth Official @FourthOfficial_ 1m Leicester are putting finishing touches to a deal to bring Esteban Cambiasso to the King Power Stadium (Various) #LCFC Here we come again... GET YOUR TITS OUT FOR THE LADS
EGBFitness Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 Well you could have left that apostrophe out for a start. For those who don't know, you never use an apostrophe for a plural (apostrophes, commas, balls, etc.). They're for missing letters (don't, can't, he's, etc.) and when something is owned by someone (Cambiasso's cue ball head). To be perfectly honest with you mate I'm really not fussed what people's spelling or grammar is on here. It's a forum about fans opinions regarding Leicester City and not an online school exam, who knows what people's age/abilities and learning difficulties are, as long as I can understand what their opinion is I'm really not bothered.
RiyadsArmy26 Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 this aint happening ffs the ropes comming out bye
leicesterlad1989 Posted 19 August 2014 Posted 19 August 2014 this aint happening ffs the ropes comming out bye Are you the actual Riyad Mahrez?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.