Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 C-Man trying to derail the thread
Unabomber Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 And just like that c man rules himself out as babylad
Guest ttfn Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 C-Man trying to derail the thread Convenient, wouldn't you say? And just like that c man rules himself in as babylad Come on, apply yourself.
StanSP Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 Follow the red badger to the covered underpass. Come alone. Tell no one. Except du du du foxman, for he is more valuable than you think. Think I'll give it a miss. Should be in the euphemism thread.
Unabomber Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 Everything points to c man imo Convenient, wouldn't you say? Come on, apply yourself. And to think I am actually a policeman serious
Guest ttfn Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 Think I'll give it a miss. Should be in the euphemism thread. Now you will never find out how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 as it happens I recall c-man asking me to call him the loco lad in the 5 a side tourney a few years back, says it all
StanSP Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 Now you will never find out how deep the rabbit hole goes.
babylad92 Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 ban the bomber It will be unfortunate, because his username is quite catchy and his posts are actually highly amusing. With that said, will the moderators be fair on me and ban everyone who uses shorthand text? Edit: To answer my question, I very much doubt it. Edit: Took but out, thanks TTFN.
Guest ttfn Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 It will be unfortunate, because his username is quite catchy and his posts are actually highly amusing. But will the moderators be fair on me and ban everyone who uses shorthand text? You should never start a sentence with the word "but" imo
StanSP Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 It will be unfortunate, because his username is quite catchy and his posts are actually highly amusing. With that said, will the moderators be fair on me and ban everyone who uses shorthand text? Edit: I don't think so. Edit: Took but out, thanks Miquel. Dunno m8
ScouseFox Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 It will be unfortunate, because his username is quite catchy and his posts are actually highly amusing. With that said, will the moderators be fair on me and ban everyone who uses shorthand text? Edit: To answer my question, I very much doubt it. Edit: Took but out, thanks TTFN. wouldn't trust any of those pesky mods imo they are a sham
Guest ttfn Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 wouldn't trust any of those pesky mods imo they are a sham I am genuinely impressed that babylad is writing full sentences; I'd always had him down as being about 18 months being a baby and all imho. I didn't start writing full sentences and dropping semi-colons until I was about 16.
Strokes Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 I am genuinely impressed that babylad is writing full sentences; I'd always had him down as being about 18 months being a baby and all imho. I didn't start writing full sentences and dropping semi-colons until I was about 16.Is a semi colon, half a bum hole or am I mistaken?
kingfox Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 If I didn't post a load of shit, you wouldn't of had this debate on who Babylad actually is. Kingfox is always good for something.
StanSP Posted 19 November 2014 Posted 19 November 2014 If I didn't post a load of shit, you wouldn't of had this debate on who Babylad actually is. Kingfox is always good for something.
kingfox Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 This tweet from your dear self made me feel exactly like that. 4 goals tonight in football. As in I scored 4. Not there were 4 goals on the pitch. That'd just be stupid.
StanSP Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 This tweet from your dear self made me feel exactly like that. 4 goals tonight in football. As in I scored 4. Not there were 4 goals on the pitch. That'd just be stupid. Good stuff. Quite sad that you remember that if it made you feel that way.
kingfox Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 Good stuff. Quite sad that you remember that if it made you feel that way. Cringe & not even witty in the slightest.
StanSP Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 Cringe & not even witty in the slightest.Thanks for the analysis
Guest Col city fan Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 Nah Babylad aint me..at least I don't think so I'd rather be like my new pal..Unabomber..
babylad92 Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 Cringe & not even witty in the slightest. Careful with dissenting against the moderators, just an FYI mate. I got banned for little reason not once, not twice, but thrice. Regards
StanSP Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 Careful with dissenting against the moderators, just an FYI mate. I got banned for little reason not once, not twice, but thrice. Regards I don't have the ability to ban people. Regards.
Dan Posted 20 November 2014 Posted 20 November 2014 Thought this was far better from England. Was worried we'd be beaten but we completely dodged the banana skin and in the end it was actually very comfortable. The third goal was excellent football.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.