cityfanlee23 Posted 12 February 2015 Posted 12 February 2015 Might aswell do the strikers as i've done the Midfield, Defence and goalkeeper stats.again just to reiterate that obviously this won't determine which of our strikers is the better "striker"All have different roles within the squad, and if they played eachothers roles the outcome may be different, so this will be an effective tool just to see who is the most influential player in our strike force. (again these stats are per 90 minutes, which allows me to put kramaric in there and be a bit fairer - His stats will obviously dramatically change as he plays more games, however we will be able to see what sort of impact he's made thus far in his bedding in period)Total forward passesKramaric - 8.27Nugent - 17.27Vardy - 9.14Ulloa - 16.07Total Backward PassesKramaric - 18.37Nugent - 14.08Vardy - 8.63Ulloa - 17.14As a forward, passing back is normally the only way they can pass, however we do pass backwards a hell of a lot during a match, take them on a bit more? (not picked a "winner" for this one)Total Passes Kramaric - 26.63Nugent - 31.55Vardy - 17.77Ulloa - 33.49Pass completionKramaric - 81%Nugent - 74%Vardy - 67%Ulloa - 73%Can the midfield and defence take all the blame for our strikers not being supplied? they clearly can't pass efficiently apart from kramaric, 74% is OK, but giving the ball away almost 3 times out of 10 is still too much. Quite wasteful really, especially considering players like Nugent and Ulloa find themselves picking up the ball in midfield, which is not a good place to put a stray pass in.Assists - DisgustingKramaric - 0 (let him off this one after 4 games)Nugent - 0.07Vardy - 0.22 (star man averages 1 assist every 4/5 games)Ulloa - 0.06Chances created - Just as badKramaric - 0 (again cant really comment so far)Nugent - 1.00Vardy - 1.29Ulloa - 1.36 playing 2 strikers we average around 2 chances per 90 minutes..... Not their job to create? or simply not enough regardless?Average pass lengthKramaric - 17.25Nugent - 14.32Vardy - 14.71Ulloa - 13.52Goals return per 90 minutesKramaric - 0.46Nugent - 0.13Vardy - 0.07Ulloa - 0.40 (not bad considering he's played 25 games this season)Total shotsKramaric - 3.21 - Confidence!Nugent - 1.99Vardy - 1.51Ulloa - 1.70Shot accuracyKramaric - 83%Nugent - 37 %Vardy - 65%Ulloa - 48%Bar kramaric, I was absolutely ashamed at this figure until i saw Harry kane only hits 59% and Diego costa 72% Still needs improving if we are to take our chances. Big difference between "on target" and "in" though.Tackles won (defending from the front)Kramaric - 0.46 (again give him time)Nugent - 0.46Vardy - 0.72Ulloa - 1.47Tackles lost Kramaric - 0.92Nugent - 1.33Vardy - 1.22Ulloa - 2.04Not bad to say our strikers get successfully tackled a maximum of 2x per game (what the hell do we do with it then? )Successful take ons Kramaric - 0.92Nugent - 0.86Vardy - 1.22Ulloa - 0.68Do we need to run at them more? we always seem a bit scared to me.Aerial Duels wonKramaric - 1.38Nugent - 3.12Vardy - 2.37Ulloa - 4.36Quite happy with that, I'd be happier if we kept it on the floor though unless ulloa is in the boxRESULTKramaric - 6Nugent - 1Vardy - 2Ulloa - 4Out of the main attacking statistics, Kramaric has shown in 4 games that he is the best STRIKER we have on the team (if he can keep it up), this is only over 4 games however so look into that however you want, If he can keep it up and improve he could be a really decent weapon.HOWEVER, DAVID NUGENT, although not excelling at the real final 3rd stuff, has got the highest score for total stats, and is actually our most effective attacker with regard to his contribution to the TEAM (all the other stats i didnt include)One thing is clearly obvious though, although they don't get the best service with the ball, we do create numerous clear chances as a team and we are bloody wasteful. the midfield cant be blamed for it all, our attack hasn't been clinical (which we all know)These stats so far have been eye opening, and have put alot of posters quick fixes to rest, it's not as simple as just "Sign a left back" or "sign a new midfielder" as the rest of the teams stats are not really screaming class.As pearson said in an interview behind the scenes, If we can improve every player 10% the team improves over 100%Let's hope the coaching staff can get them on track again.Or would a new manager with fresh ideas get the best out of them?Discuss.
Stadt Posted 12 February 2015 Posted 12 February 2015 How can you still not spell aerial after 2 threads taking the piss?
cc_star Posted 12 February 2015 Posted 12 February 2015 Looking at Ulloa's 'Aerial duels won' stat, it's quite frankly bizarre Albrighton and his crossing ability hasn't been played more... and when Albrighton does get on, Ulloa is often subbed meaning Albrighton is crossing to players who aren't likely to win headers. No surprise Nugent comes out on top of overall stats, the team performance as a whole has generally been improved with him on the pitch (others tend to have a bit more tempo about them) despite his individual weakness in front of goal BTW - Great series of posts, Mahrez, Schlupp, Albrighton & Knockaert next?
cityfanlee23 Posted 12 February 2015 Author Posted 12 February 2015 How can you still not spell aerial after 2 threads taking the piss? Didn't even notice i'd done it or i'd have changed it! eyes have gone square!
lgfualol Posted 12 February 2015 Posted 12 February 2015 Really expected more from Vardy and Nugent before the season. Conclusion: Don't play Vardy again, keep Ulloa and Kramaric fit. Kevin Phillips should do a better job getting them to actually shoot and shoot on target.
Banks Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 Conclusion: Ulloa has been shite since late September, Vardy and Nugent haven't been great, Kramaric is our only hope.
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 What a load of rubbish! Bending the stats to make Kramaric our best striker after just three matches I think. There's only one stat needed to show who's been our best striker this year when on the whole everyone's been pretty poor: goals.
Fox Ulike Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 Might aswell do the strikers as i've done the Midfield, Defence and goalkeeper stats. again just to reiterate that obviously this won't determine which of our strikers is the better "striker" All have different roles within the squad, and if they played eachothers roles the outcome may be different, so this will be an effective tool just to see who is the most influential player in our strike force. (again these stats are per 90 minutes, which allows me to put kramaric in there and be a bit fairer - His stats will obviously dramatically change as he plays more games, however we will be able to see what sort of impact he's made thus far in his bedding in period) Total forward passes Kramaric - 8.27 Nugent - 17.27 Vardy - 9.14 Ulloa - 16.07 Total Backward Passes Kramaric - 18.37 Nugent - 14.08 Vardy - 8.63 Ulloa - 17.14 As a forward, passing back is normally the only way they can pass, however we do pass backwards a hell of a lot during a match, take them on a bit more? (not picked a "winner" for this one) Total Passes Kramaric - 26.63 Nugent - 31.55 Vardy - 17.77 Ulloa - 33.49 Pass completion Kramaric - 81% Nugent - 74% Vardy - 67% Ulloa - 73% Can the midfield and defence take all the blame for our strikers not being supplied? they clearly can't pass efficiently apart from kramaric, 74% is OK, but giving the ball away almost 3 times out of 10 is still too much. Quite wasteful really, especially considering players like Nugent and Ulloa find themselves picking up the ball in midfield, which is not a good place to put a stray pass in. Assists - Disgusting Kramaric - 0 (let him off this one after 4 games) Nugent - 0.07 Vardy - 0.22 (star man averages 1 assist every 4/5 games) Ulloa - 0.06 Chances created - Just as bad Kramaric - 0 (again cant really comment so far) Nugent - 1.00 Vardy - 1.29 Ulloa - 1.36 playing 2 strikers we average around 2 chances per 90 minutes..... Not their job to create? or simply not enough regardless? Average pass length Kramaric - 17.25 Nugent - 14.32 Vardy - 14.71 Ulloa - 13.52 Goals return per 90 minutes Kramaric - 0.46 Nugent - 0.13 Vardy - 0.07 Ulloa - 0.40 (not bad considering he's played 25 games this season) Total shots Kramaric - 3.21 - Confidence! Nugent - 1.99 Vardy - 1.51 Ulloa - 1.70 Shot accuracy Kramaric - 83% Nugent - 37 % Vardy - 65% Ulloa - 48% Bar kramaric, I was absolutely ashamed at this figure until i saw Harry kane only hits 59% and Diego costa 72% Still needs improving if we are to take our chances. Big difference between "on target" and "in" though. Tackles won (defending from the front) Kramaric - 0.46 (again give him time) Nugent - 0.46 Vardy - 0.72 Ulloa - 1.47 Tackles lost Kramaric - 0.92 Nugent - 1.33 Vardy - 1.22 Ulloa - 2.04 Not bad to say our strikers get successfully tackled a maximum of 2x per game (what the hell do we do with it then? ) Successful take ons Kramaric - 0.92 Nugent - 0.86 Vardy - 1.22 Ulloa - 0.68 Do we need to run at them more? we always seem a bit scared to me. Aerial Duels won Kramaric - 1.38 Nugent - 3.12 Vardy - 2.37 Ulloa - 4.36 Quite happy with that, I'd be happier if we kept it on the floor though unless ulloa is in the box RESULT Kramaric - 6 Nugent - 1 Vardy - 2 Ulloa - 4 Out of the main attacking statistics, Kramaric has shown in 4 games that he is the best STRIKER we have on the team (if he can keep it up), this is only over 4 games however so look into that however you want, If he can keep it up and improve he could be a really decent weapon. HOWEVER, DAVID NUGENT, although not excelling at the real final 3rd stuff, has got the highest score for total stats, and is actually our most effective attacker with regard to his contribution to the TEAM (all the other stats i didnt include) One thing is clearly obvious though, although they don't get the best service with the ball, we do create numerous clear chances as a team and we are bloody wasteful. the midfield cant be blamed for it all, our attack hasn't been clinical (which we all know) These stats so far have been eye opening, and have put alot of posters quick fixes to rest, it's not as simple as just "Sign a left back" or "sign a new midfielder" as the rest of the teams stats are not really screaming class. As pearson said in an interview behind the scenes, If we can improve every player 10% the team improves over 100% Let's hope the coaching staff can get them on track again. Or would a new manager with fresh ideas get the best out of them? Discuss. Don't you have a job?
Mjeb Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 How can you still not spell aerial after 2 threads taking the piss? Get. A life #osser
steveherbe Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 Nugent 37% shooting accuracy means 37% of the times he shoots, the ball hits his foot.
Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 How can you still not spell aerial after 2 threads taking the piss? I read that looking at your avatar in Nige's angry voice
Manwell Pablo Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 Might aswell do the strikers as i've done the Midfield, Defence and goalkeeper stats. again just to reiterate that obviously this won't determine which of our strikers is the better "striker" All have different roles within the squad, and if they played eachothers roles the outcome may be different, so this will be an effective tool just to see who is the most influential player in our strike force. (again these stats are per 90 minutes, which allows me to put kramaric in there and be a bit fairer - His stats will obviously dramatically change as he plays more games, however we will be able to see what sort of impact he's made thus far in his bedding in period) Total forward passes Kramaric - 8.27 Nugent - 17.27 Vardy - 9.14 Ulloa - 16.07 Total Backward Passes Kramaric - 18.37 Nugent - 14.08 Vardy - 8.63 Ulloa - 17.14 As a forward, passing back is normally the only way they can pass, however we do pass backwards a hell of a lot during a match, take them on a bit more? (not picked a "winner" for this one) Total Passes Kramaric - 26.63 Nugent - 31.55 Vardy - 17.77 Ulloa - 33.49 Pass completion Kramaric - 81% Nugent - 74% Vardy - 67% Ulloa - 73% Can the midfield and defence take all the blame for our strikers not being supplied? they clearly can't pass efficiently apart from kramaric, 74% is OK, but giving the ball away almost 3 times out of 10 is still too much. Quite wasteful really, especially considering players like Nugent and Ulloa find themselves picking up the ball in midfield, which is not a good place to put a stray pass in. Assists - Disgusting Kramaric - 0 (let him off this one after 4 games) Nugent - 0.07 Vardy - 0.22 (star man averages 1 assist every 4/5 games) Ulloa - 0.06 Chances created - Just as bad Kramaric - 0 (again cant really comment so far) Nugent - 1.00 Vardy - 1.29 Ulloa - 1.36 playing 2 strikers we average around 2 chances per 90 minutes..... Not their job to create? or simply not enough regardless? Average pass length Kramaric - 17.25 Nugent - 14.32 Vardy - 14.71 Ulloa - 13.52 Goals return per 90 minutes Kramaric - 0.46 Nugent - 0.13 Vardy - 0.07 Ulloa - 0.40 (not bad considering he's played 25 games this season) Total shots Kramaric - 3.21 - Confidence! Nugent - 1.99 Vardy - 1.51 Ulloa - 1.70 Shot accuracy Kramaric - 83% Nugent - 37 % Vardy - 65% Ulloa - 48% Bar kramaric, I was absolutely ashamed at this figure until i saw Harry kane only hits 59% and Diego costa 72% Still needs improving if we are to take our chances. Big difference between "on target" and "in" though. Tackles won (defending from the front) Kramaric - 0.46 (again give him time) Nugent - 0.46 Vardy - 0.72 Ulloa - 1.47 Tackles lost Kramaric - 0.92 Nugent - 1.33 Vardy - 1.22 Ulloa - 2.04 Not bad to say our strikers get successfully tackled a maximum of 2x per game (what the hell do we do with it then? ) Successful take ons Kramaric - 0.92 Nugent - 0.86 Vardy - 1.22 Ulloa - 0.68 Do we need to run at them more? we always seem a bit scared to me. Aerial Duels won Kramaric - 1.38 Nugent - 3.12 Vardy - 2.37 Ulloa - 4.36 Quite happy with that, I'd be happier if we kept it on the floor though unless ulloa is in the box RESULT Kramaric - 6 Nugent - 1 Vardy - 2 Ulloa - 4 Out of the main attacking statistics, Kramaric has shown in 4 games that he is the best STRIKER we have on the team (if he can keep it up), this is only over 4 games however so look into that however you want, If he can keep it up and improve he could be a really decent weapon. HOWEVER, DAVID NUGENT, although not excelling at the real final 3rd stuff, has got the highest score for total stats, and is actually our most effective attacker with regard to his contribution to the TEAM (all the other stats i didnt include) One thing is clearly obvious though, although they don't get the best service with the ball, we do create numerous clear chances as a team and we are bloody wasteful. the midfield cant be blamed for it all, our attack hasn't been clinical (which we all know) These stats so far have been eye opening, and have put alot of posters quick fixes to rest, it's not as simple as just "Sign a left back" or "sign a new midfielder" as the rest of the teams stats are not really screaming class. As pearson said in an interview behind the scenes, If we can improve every player 10% the team improves over 100% Let's hope the coaching staff can get them on track again. Or would a new manager with fresh ideas get the best out of them? Discuss. People have been saying that anyway it hardly needs proving with every statistic you can get your hands on. Not eye opening at all they read exactly as I would expect. Good point about the midfield though it does still amaze me people have blamed that department with missed chances and defensive mistakes present in nearly every game.
LAprice_ Posted 13 February 2015 Posted 13 February 2015 Isn't Chris Wood on about 0.65 goals per 90 minutes in the league? He's not played a full game in the PremierLeague this season but it'll be interesting to note how his many cameo roles compare
.thumb.jpg.0f95136a6257ee11e86a63a7c5a96cf3.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.