Danizen

Stevie Bute sounds like the sort of cvnt who can't pick what to have for breakfast without running it by some nefarious, wasteful data centre in California.

In the same way that some of the fanbase couldn't get over the Forest connection with Steve Cooper, would he suffer the same fate with the 9-0?

I wouldn't bet on it.

This ****ing club, I swear...

Southampton must be as pissed off with their results against us as we are with our transfers from them!

It's a huge outlier to watch Vestergaard run and think, 'three more years of that, please'.

When in Rome...

Kramaric wasn't quite ready when he was playing for us. He had great potential but he seemed obsessed with scoring a perfect goal instead of just scoring. I'm glad it's worked out for him though. He seems like a nice guy.

Brave new world...

and we moaned non stop about Perez. I'd love a player with even half his work rate, right now.

You think this shower of shit to do anything in the playoffs except bend over?

Puts us 20th

Didn't they meekly announce something that was almost identical to the agreement that's been in place for the past 70 years? Even before Trump, the Americans would be shouting from the rooftops about any perceived diplomatic victory, especially during an election year.

Yeah, I noticed this. Almost like he tried to sort out the dressing room but realised he'd be better off pissing into the wind.

It's definitely Huth. He was so good for us, such a great personality, great leadership, and that jawline...

It's going to be Javi Gracia, isn't it?

So we've established he's absolutely shit, can someone put the cherry on top and tell me he's an arrogant cvnt who thinks he should be playing for Man City? That would make my weekend.

...anyway, here on planet earth, Javi Gracia plans to 'talk to the Watford board' after they lost today. If he leaves them he's exactly the kind of person Top will be awestruck by.

It was Danny Ward, wasn't it?

Belligerent cvnt says something belligerent and cvnty. Same as yesterday, same as tomorrow and every day until the dementia finally takes him. Edit - Donald Trump, not you!

Have we ever had a player so Qatar/Saudi?

That criticism comes up a lot, so it helps to respond calmly and confidently rather than defensively. Here are a few good ways to handle it, depending on the tone you want. Calm and reasonable “I still think for myself. I use ChatGPT the same way people use books, calculators, or colleagues—to check ideas, get unstuck, or see other perspectives.” Professional / work-oriented “Using tools efficiently is thinking. The responsibility for judgment, accuracy, and decisions is still mine.” Direct but not rude “Getting help doesn’t mean outsourcing my brain. It means I value improving my thinking.” Slightly sharp (if they’re being smug) “Using available tools isn’t laziness—it’s how problem-solving has always worked. Refusing tools doesn’t make someone deeper, just slower.” Reflective / disarming “If ChatGPT helps me ask better questions or challenge my assumptions, that’s thinking—just not in isolation.” If you want a one-line principle you can keep in your pocket: “Tools don’t replace thinking; they amplify it.” And if you want to shut it down entirely: “What matters is the quality of the outcome, not whether I stared at a blank page alone.” If you tell me who said it (friend, coworker, professor, online stranger) and how confrontational they were, I can tailor a response that fits that exact situation.

Hopefully the Febreeze money is keeping him ticking along so he doesn't need to take the Leicester job.

For now...

Don't worry, it'll get better in the second half...