Parafox

Collectively or individually or both? Should they all hang their heads in collective shame because they got duped or believed what the Daily Mail said? Sadly, the readers of the MSM generally form their opinions based on what they read which usually supports and feeds into their own personal beliefs whether it be left or right rhetoric, so DM/Mirror readers will believe there's migrants on every street corner waiting to rob them. Readers of the Grauniad will think every asylum seeker is genuine and should be given homes and money. It's a battle most "right" (logical) thinking people will never win because of such self centred biased press. We just have to accept that no ideal is right above any other because whatever we as individuals think or want to make society the best it can be will be undermined by the many ideologist pressure groups who will push and push for the right to be a voice for their own beliefs (not religion). Society has become so fractured by all of the above that no-one knows where their feet should fall. What or who to believe, afraid to challenge for fear of a random accusation of being "somethingist" . I have gone off at a bit of a tangent but I just want to live in a world without the constant anxiety of how I conduct myself, what I can and can't say for fear of offending someone with a green beard or a lifestyle that I don't understand. Minority groups need to accept that. They Don't. It's all about them.

"Justice System".

I've reposted this on here from the "City of Leicester Dump" topic. The police believe the 6 attackers are from Sheffield and were in Leicester for the game.. Liam had been to the match earlier and had been out in town afterwards. He was walking home through the city with a friend at 5am when he was jumped for no reason beaten and kicked in the head. He is still is very poorly on ICU with multiple skull fractures and some removal of damaged brain tissue. His recovery is uncertain.

Our friend's son was randomly attacked on Horsefair Street in the early hours of Sunday morning. He had a bleed on the brain as a result and had to have part of his skull removed to relieve the pressure. He is now in ICU in an induced coma whilst they wait to see how he progresses. So yes, right now the city of Leicester is a dump

We know it, the developed world knows it, he himself knows it. Nobody, no government with any political power has ever made any really robust challenge against him and his actions, even after 5 years. The things he's been on trial for are relatively minor given the genocide he's presided over. It'll just be given lip service and he and his corrupt cohorts will never stand trial in any international or any other court, and the USA and other countries will just ignore everything and let Israel get on with whatever they're doing.

Close this topic it's another pointless waste of time.

Sadly though, the owners, the board and the hanger's on will still be there making the same poor decisions

That edit is unfair Trav. It takes strength of character and dedication to do what @jonthefox does

Smack the bitch up. Slash his tyres and piss on his chips

You're still wrong. We've been there before and escaped but those were under a very different ownership, one that knew football as well as business and had a desire for the club. This Thai boy hasn't got an inkling of any of that. We're like a Pandora charm on his bracelet. Looked attractive once, now it's gone all dull and jaded and he can't be assed to polish it up because it actually means very little to him other than a minor trinket that his dad used to own.

I'm Rudkin and so is my wife.

A great song (and album) regardless of our situation.

Punting balls up to Ayew is pointless. Ayew is largely pointless. He hasn't got the pace and guile of Vardy to trick defenders and get behind. If Ayew can do anything it's only one thing and that is... erm, sorry, I've forgotten. Oh, maybe… nope... Ah yes, fall over, that's what I was trying to think of.

Yeah, actually I can't remember masses of supporters casting a critical eye over Birstall players and getting pissed off if we had a laff afterwards.

Sorry, who?

They've got a manager that motivates them and generates team spirit and cohesion. A manager with a vision and a plan and way of getting it embedded in her team. We've got Cifuentes

Fair point.

Back in the day when I played local league football it wasn't uncommon to go for a pint or two in the local pub with players from the opposition. You can be rivals on the pitch but mates off it. And you have no idea what they might have been laughing at. Probably nothing to do with football.

You'd think that they'd put effort in to attract the attention of better clubs and improve their CV rather than fold like a paper tissue and show no fight or even desire to win.

We've gone from fearless to hopeless. How sad

Quite. But women won't suffer from incontinence or erectile dysfunction which, in the latter is a often a major issue for men who would otherwise still be sexually active. That's not to dismiss the psychological and emotional trauma breast removal has on women. I don't disagree but the current tests don't discriminate between the relatively benign and the more aggressive. So you have a screening done and it comes back as positive for cancer. It doesn't define which type, and how high risk it is for you as an individual. It's only when the individual has already been identified as being in a high risk group that the test can be life saving. That's why routine screening for all men isn't the correct way forward and it should be targeted at the high risk groups as they're (potentially) already known to their doctors.

If you read the article, there are genuine and balanced reasons for not mass testing men. The intention is to test those most in the highest risk groups thereby avoiding over diagnosing: "The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) has instead recommended that there should be a targeted screening programme for men with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 faulty gene variant, which means they are more at risk of faster growing and aggressive cancers at an earlier age. Men in that category could be screened every two years between the ages of 45 and 61, they said. The committee found that the “harms would outweigh the benefits” if it were to recommend prostate cancer screening for all men or for men with a relevant family history of cancer, as it could lead to a small reduction in the number of prostate cancer deaths but “very high levels of over-diagnosis” I think this is what over diagnosis means: The committee estimated that about 40-50% of prostate cancer cases detected by PSA screening would be slow-growing, and that further treatment and testing for these slow-growing cancers would lead to high levels of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, “causing unnecessary anxiety and lifelong side-effects such as incontinence, erectile dysfunction and bladder problems for a cancer that would never have caused harm”.

On welfare. As they always do.

I do wonder how many FT posters at the match are actually simultaneously "watching" whilst making knee jerk comments whilst subsequently missing parts of the game as it happens thereby making their comments irrelevant. "Fatawu is shite". 5secs later "Fatawuuuuuuu Gerrrrinnn yesssss"