Parafox

New Epstein emails that mention Trump released by House Democrats - live updates - BBC News The tighter and closer the net closes on those involved, the more I expect a key individual (or 2) to "disappear". Smoke and fire etc.

Non news.

It's not as open and closed as the Orange Man expects: In a potential defamation lawsuit against the BBC in the United States (specifically Florida, where he has residency), Donald Trump would need to prove three main components: 1) The content was false and defamatory: Trump must show that the BBC's edited presentation of his January 6, 2021 speech was factually false and harmful to his reputation. The core of his claim is that the documentary "intentionally sought to completely mislead its viewers" by splicing together two parts of his speech, making it appear as if he explicitly encouraged the US Capitol riot. 2) He suffered harm: He would need to demonstrate that he experienced "overwhelming financial and reputational harm" as a direct result of the specific BBC program. Proving a monetary value for such harm, especially the $1 billion being sought, would be a significant challenge, as he would have to demonstrate major losses. 3) "Actual Malice": As a public figure, Trump faces a high legal bar under US law and must prove the BBC acted with "actual malice." This means he must provide evidence that the BBC either knew the statement was false or acted with "reckless disregard of whether it was true or false". Proving the internal thought processes or intentional deception of the BBC's editors could be difficult. Additionally, a key initial hurdle for Trump's legal team is to establish the court's jurisdiction by proving that the specific Panorama documentary episode was actually available to be viewed in the state of Florida. The documentary was aired in the UK on iPlayer, which is generally not available in the US. Again, all bluster from a narcissistic psycho/sociopath.

I've only driven in Florida when on holiday. What surprised me was the lack of a central reservation on many highways. If there was one, it seemed to be hawser cables stretched between anchor posts. Not "on the road annoyance" related but what I did like in Florida was the Cracker Barrel restaurants. It was several years ago but the one local to us was great.

Really?

By which side?

For clarity: From TVlicence.gov.uk: In the UK, it is a legal requirement to have a TV Licence if you watch or record live TV on any channel, or download or watch BBC programmes on BBC iPlayer, on any device. Ignoring this law can lead to prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000. You do not need a TV Licence to watch: streaming services like Netflix and Disney Plus on-demand TV through services like All 4 and Amazon Prime Video videos on websites like YouTube videos or DVDs How much it costs A TV Licence costs £174.50 (£58.50 for black and white TV sets) for both homes and businesses.

Where I live, I turn left from my road and within 300mts there's side roads leading to and from Mcdonald's and then Morrison's. I can promise you that at any time of day, someone will drive straight out in front to me causing me to brake. McDonald's... young drivers.. Morrison's... not so.

Anti-BBC dogma.

Is it? Rubbish statement I'm not even sure what is meant by that statement. Does he think the BBC are going to fold and fail and stop broadcasting. Or is more likely that he resents the licence fee and will use any angle to diss the organisation?

Get in the "Unpopular Opinions" topic you pleb.

Redneck America can't see it. I really don't understand why. Surely they can't all be trailer park, gun totin' deer huntin' moonshine dumbwits? Or do they think "The Hills Have Eyes" was a promotional documentary.

I've got a spending envelope too. Currently it has a five pound note in it.

There never will be any justification despite the despot in the Whitehouse saying it's justified and pushing his determination to put people into poverty. What's wrong with the man? He has no shred of compassion or humanity. On Friday, moments after a federal appeals court ruled the Trump administration needs to fully fund Snap food aid payments, the White House turned to the supreme court in a further attempt to block the order. Within hours, the top US court issued an emergency order temporarily blocking full Snap food aid payments, which nearly 42 million people rely on to put food on the table.

Such a good player

I'm gonna start talking to my wife from behind my handì

Difficult to say. The keeper's knee made slight contact but did it take him off balance. He went down late and easy

There's some needle in this match

Why does he keep playing Ayew? MC + JA = QPR love-in. Which means he won't drop the trash.

The Royal British Legion Festival of remembrance. Emotionally moving. Men that served in WW2 still here to tell their story. Such bravery an sacrifice

Cold chips are awful Even you reheat in the microwave they're just soggy potato lumps

Cov city. Doing well. Could they be us in 1996? I hope not, but fair play to them.

Did it come with a free tea towel If so, I'm in. "checking Amazon"

What make of TV? I'm looking for a replacement for my CRT telly. Did it come with a remote control as I keep tripping over the wire for mine