coolhandfox

Maybe a combination of us being a little more careful with fees and wages after being burnt and being slight less appealing due to the backdrop of a point deduction. I always think the is uncertain in the market due to PSR across the board, and other changes in the financial landscape.

I don't think we have enough join up thinking across the two clubs both could benefit more from being sister clubs.

Not buying that @Ric Flair. 2 + 2 = 22

Even 80k a week is only 4.1m Who are you buying and paying for a total less than that.

We have a decent amount of head room by my calculations, our amortisation has dropped to around 36m this summer from a high of 78m two seasons ago even with our summer additions. Wages will be sufficiently lower too, I don't see PSR as a massive blocker this summer. I think it's more one eye on the impact of swift return to the championship.

Not sure it any less viable than a Winks and Ndidi double pivot.

Which probably is his level.

Haven't brought a programme for years.

I can only go on what people post......

Think this is an old link from when we thought Chelsea would go for Mads.

I suspect we are looking for at least 2-3 players the movement. I would also imagine Liverpool and Arsenal are looking for 30-40m for their respective players. We more then likely want two for that amount

Seems people aren't able to get their head around general business principles. Director of finance works with parts of a organisation to agree budgets, which is then signed off for the by the board. Rudkin would have been working to the budget agreed by the board.

No really buying the Tanner explanation sound to me like his thinking of Transfer income vs expenditure i.e. money in money out. From a PSR point of view area on on a new 3 year cycle of 22/23 - 23/24- 24/25 I think we have around 40m- 60m head room on the PSR calculation even after we brought Fatawu and Okoli.

Not strictly true 17 goal contributions in 3563 one every 209 minutes, so roughly 1 every 2.32 games PL wise goal 12 goal contributions in 2465 one every 205 minutes. So not that shabby!

Dirty animal, keep your nocturnal actives to yourself......

He can be a 10 which is one area we have a real need?

@Ric Flair spoiler alert mate Not listened yet!

Another player that gets better without playing.

They wouldn't be wheeling him out with an ACL

21m in pounds, we are desperate to strengthen so I wouldn't bet against it.

According to Rob Tanner in the Athletic last month: Part of the reason the move collapsed was because an ankle issue showed up during the 28-year-old midfielder’s medical, and LCFC wanted to add an injury clause to the terms in case the problem worsened. I think it had more to do with the club's failure to agree on terms rather than with our lack of money.

I stopped reading at the point where it mentioned the Mercury.

That wasn't the reason

I don't mind an obligation as long as it has caveats, i.e. only activated if we stay up and he made 30 apps.

I think we have more in the defence side from a PL standard. But I agree they nick it on attacking side but can all change we some decent signings.