foxile5

Also Vardy is missing recently. So not the only thing.

Caring about this club shouldn't be a passive activity that is reserved to liking bullshit on the ether. We should actively care, and challenge, that the club is ran from top to bottom in the way that actually represents us as fans. A small part, but significant in the context of the wider world, is social media. For better or worse. We should absolutely be challenging this God awful presentation of the club no matter how insignificant it seems.

As usual you're on the money.

Honestly, I don't think the current crop of players have it in them to be that salacious. There isn't a mite of rebellion or disruption. They're just mass within space.

It'll be run by some fresh-from-a-marketing-course twenty something with absolutely no investment in the club or football in general. They'll be thinking they're doing a great job.

Think it's as simple as he wants to perform there and feels some form of responsibility. He's not a BAD player in that he's a seasoned international and he's had a solid - if unimpressive - career at the very top end. It's an attitude issue that slightly mirrors Evans basically giving up because he couldn't give a toss at the end. Obviously they're very different in terms of quality but there are parallels there

Premier Ambition; Amateur Decisions Or Rotten from Top These are the best in my opinion.

Maresca interview a week before he left on loan - words to the effect of players not feeling like they belong in this division. So yes. True.

Played 30+ games - got us relegated Refused to play in the championship as he felt it beneath him. Came back to play another 30+ games and relegate us. He's ****ing toxic.

If we approach this from the perspective of football as a business and an entertainment entity - it's insulting they think that the prices should be comparable to the last two seasons. Diminished performances and almost certainly a diminished product next year.

Taylor also presided over much more 'success' here. You can argue the toss over who is responsible for that success but the brass tacks is that the team he managed scored and won much more.

Even Sam Allardyce waited to be sacked when he was caught ****ing fiddling at the England job. Why on earth would Ruud Van Nistlerooy suddenly develop a conscience that literally no premier League manager has had for two decades.

"Hello Ruud - if we sack you then we have to pay you several million pounds. You could 'save face' and quit. Would you like several million pounds or would you like you like to 'save face' and quit a job nobody expected you to succeed at?" The levels of delusion are at peak insanity. He's going nowhere.

He's not walking. He won't sacrifice millions to 'save face'. That hasn't happened for decades. Utterly ridiculous.

He's incredibly aggressive too. Other fans are scared of him. Unreal.

'How can anyone boo that performancec East Stand J1

I had an aunties boyfriend that worked at man u that's why I support them. Not because they win in the nineties. Worst fanbase in the game. Embarrassing success parasites.

Nobodies cousin, aunty, or brothers sisters friend ever had any connection with Cheltenham or Derby did they?

'I watch Germany because my cousin works there'

'I support Brazil at the world cup because my aunty is from there'

We are so, so bad. In spite of that - imagine being a Man United fan. Picking the best team when you were five and watching it deteriorate into nothing. The whole time you have to pretend that your 'uncle was took you to your first game' or some other spurious bullshit. Imagine having to live that particular lie. At least my club are organically mine. And they're ****ing horrible.

I'm not sure what it actually means. Are we on the step to privatised health care with this?

Deny the evidence of your eyes and ears. Easily proved isn't it? The cricket have managed it for decades with snickometer. It's not right and it's not credible. Show me a video that backs this up in any way.

You can't really work on assumption though, in this instance. Needs to be clear evidence presented to the public doesn't there? What if he's hit it into the floor and the sensors have picked up that. Not really fair and sporting to decide a game on assumption and balance of probability. Otherwise let's assume the results prior and save the effort. I've no dog in the fight either way - I couldn't care less about which team goes through - but the integrity is important and I'm yet to see any real evidence that was anything other than a decent penalty.

Shouldn't make the decision based on 'non natural ball elevation'. At this stage of such a tournament it needs to be provable. Can't see any evidence yet that makes it concrete.