Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

st albans fox

Member
  • Posts

    42,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by st albans fox

  1. I was referencing goals and assists Winks is a tempo cdm but he has problems defensively which means he can’t be a single pivot unless a team is going to hold 65%+ possession
  2. And she has ruined the chances of all those who will come after her (because the time delay means the course will be slower) which pretty much means her team mate now wins (of course it’s not related that it’s an American in 1st place )
  3. And she crashed out early on how on earth did they allow her to take part ?
  4. How can Lyndsey Vonn be competing in the downhill with a ruptured ACL ?
  5. The last bloke we employed who had been at Sunderland was a disaster - but everyone who knew anything was aware that would happen. this fella would only need to be able to spell his name and count to ten to be an improvement
  6. And this is where rudkin is a massive fail he had the opportunity to buy lookman for around. £15m and he should have taken it and sold barnes for £40m. That’s what clubs our size do to stay ahead of psr. They trade. Whether it was rudkin who wouldn’t accept that or top I have no idea. But we had opportunities to sell assets at a profit and we ignored continually them. apart from the odd one, most of the players who left for nothing could (and should) have been sold when they had several years left on their contracts.
  7. Presumably they worked a pattern to drag us around and make the space for the run. sort of thing that good coaches spend their time during the week doing.
  8. How was Neil Lennon’s record ? Marty james? Wilf when he played there ? Hamza? not a fair metric for his position
  9. If another club was prepared to pay him 30k/week then we’d could have cancelled his contract and paid him what we owed him less 600k. So we’d save ourselves 600k, the player wouldn’t be out of pocket and we’d have a bad egg out of the door. Clearly that wasn’t achievable or we decided we needed him.
  10. another questionable decision. I’m not going to say poor because the club must have identified others who they’d prefer as manager. but the proof of the pudding says that he looks like he migh5 be a decent head coach
  11. Our next accounts are audited at the end of June. On June 30th, winks’ book value becomes zero. If we cancelled his contract today and paid him off then we’d not lose anything re the end June accounts. There must have been an option for us to do that in January and for him to find a new club and we could save whatever they were prepared to pay him. Given that we aren’t flush with holding tempo midfielders, the decision was to hold him. But what’s not clear is that if marti wasn’t going to play him then why didn’t we get rid early in the window. (Unless we knew we were sacking him or there was a good chance of it)
  12. I just saw it on x looks like he stumbles as he tracks him good that at least one of the centre backs covered aswell ……
  13. Isn’t he their striker ?
  14. Who was his man ?
  15. no point giving the ref an accuse to send you off but that’s a yellow for me. still an unnecessary and crude attempt to try and stick one on the winger
  16. Cos they decided that Thomas is so good he doesn’t need any protection and we’re going to defend the middle of the pitch and give away the flanks
  17. Maybe we can fine him for being s twat ? 2 weeks wages every little helps at least makasa or page can come in and get a run in that position next games or maybe take daka off and e a false 9 - daka and ayew are scamming us as nines anyway
  18. Can’t see him dropping Jakub Otherwise I reckon that is going to be accurate (if he has the balls to drop ayew)
  19. Because the story wasn’t that the administration is racist (we all know this) - the story is the negative response and embarrassment of those who support the administration Dog bites man is not news the opposite is
  20. Should our security services have been more aware of what was in these files. Would the fbi have rejected MI6 asking for access to see what was in them re British interests (primarily Andrew and Mandelson)? starmer must have known that there could be stuff in the files that would be bad news for associates of Epstein. The fact he took that risk without having anything other than mandelson’s assurances doesn’t fit with his safety first approach to most things. There must be stuff we haven’t been told because I just don’t buy Starmer taking such a gamble.
  21. Anyone in any position of responsibility in this country would have to resign (or be sacked) the USA is a weird place
  22. I thought the parachute payments were based on the average earned over the previous three seasons in the PL prior to relegation. I may have misunderstood this back in 2023
  23. Did we receive larger para payments due to our previous good placements in the league ?
  24. Love that they picked the right journo to write the article
×
×
  • Create New...