Foxmeister

We've lost 1 game in our last 10...... with 10 men and some dubious refereeing decisions. Definitely no need for panic stations and talk of leads being wiped out. Over the course of Saints 20 game run they've picked up 1 point more than us.

Scoring a 120th minute winner in FA Cup final and a year in Saudi.

Any ethnic minority fans in the 70s and 80s would have been put off attending games by the awful culture in grounds. TV supporters are far more likely to follow the big clubs when we would have only been on tv for half a dozen 10 minute slots per season.

This may well have already been said but Forest being deducted 6 points would put them in the frame for legal action by us as they only finished 4 points above us. Getting £50m each from 2 clubs would be easier than £100m from 1. The argument that this is in place to protect the big 6 is a tricky one for me, at some point the drawbridge had to be pulled up to avoid the Portsmouth '08 situation, our own under Peter Taylor and quite a few others, it can take decades for clubs to recover from 1 season of a big gamble to get survival that fails.

Would you rather we kept him until the end of the window (see Fofana) and get £50m, maybe less because we'd be desperate to sell at that point with a year remaining on his contract, and miss out on Hermansen, Winks, Mavididi.....

Fabulous analogy that 👌

Listening to Simon Jordan on Talksport, Forest might have a case for the appeal based on the Brennan Johnson transfer, whilst it was outside the accounts window for the season, the delay in sale was for sound financial reasons and may be taken into account. It would reduce the losses they can make this season however.

Hopefully they'll both start on minus points next season.

I don't think he was partizan, just sh1t.

The debate is for dangerous play surely? In that case double jeopardy doesn't apply, that's only for denying a goal scoring opportunity.

It's an important game but I think it's fair to say defeat won't end our hopes.

It wasn't out of play at the time of the challenge though.

I'm dying to know how you think the game would be restarted if he's sent off and there's no penalty.

Double jeopardy doesn't apply to dangerous play.

Is this his 3rd out of 5?

Not the most successful but really important in raising the profile of the club. By anyone's standards he is an absolute gentleman, hoping for a miracle.

It's a star jump to make you as big as possible, KS did it all the time. The player shooting is well inside the six yard box, anyone can be made to look bad from a screenshot, I dare say KS would have looked ridiculous from the initial header across for the Deeney goal.

Might be a bit of a Mahrez speeding ticket situation. I would imagine Heskey would have legal representation who clearly haven't been informed yet, it's quite possible this will be easily sorted.

Chelsea and Man City's money didn't make strikers better.

Cynical me feels the police act because it's high profile, good PR and easily prosecuted. There's been a report on the BBC of a burglary the police, essentially, didn't investigate, I deplore this sort of behaviour and there should consequences but which is more important? It would be nice to think they're banned and their employers send them down the road for bringing the business into disrepute, easy done and proportionate justice.

We only need the Football League Trophy and League 2 for the full set. 👍

Calm down Che Guevara

I'm not so sure, West Ham compensated Sheff Utd over the Tevez saga, it was out of court but I doubt they'd have settled if there wasn't a risk.

I think he was unsighted, it was sweetly struck and the marking was horrendous.

Anyone know who our first player born this millennium was?