Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Frank Large's Black Book

Member
  • Posts

    572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Frank Large's Black Book

  1. Would I be wrong to suggest the longer it takes for the tribunal to happen the better for Leicester as he progresses further up the Liverpool ranks. And I agree about a sell on fee, perhaps married to games played thresholds to cover others
  2. Views expressed on Foxestalk are always right.
  3. How about "we can't charge Leicester so we won't charge anyone as that may help Leicester. Pending a revamp of rules"
  4. Examples of 'clearly' please. Not challenging you per se, and you may prove to be correct, it's just that the only 'clearly' I've seen are from dubious itk's and the usual suspects on here. Really happy to retract if you convince me.
  5. 'scuse me. Dumb Question Alert. Why are teams worried (or not) about breaching? Surely to god they a) know the rules, and b) know their numbers. What exactly is difficult? Note: this is a serious question, not an invitation to rant on about our leadership - again.
  6. Fixed it for you Keller, Mads, Long John Silver
  7. Leicester City Confirms LiteFinance as Official Trading Partner https://www.naijanews.com/2024/12/21/leicester-city-confirms-litefinance-as-official-trading-partner/
  8. Ooh no matron.
  9. Can we just rule out Southgate. There is no way he would get the approval of Vards.
  10. I'd be tempted to ensure a £1.93 overspend for 23/24 and see what the EPL do.
  11. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1943339/John-Paintsil-hospitalised-car-crash/amp
  12. Can I ask a dumb question...... If this is announced today can we assume 23/24 psr is going to be ok? If it's announced tomorrow then is 23/24 at best tight. Ok 2 dumb questions
  13. I wonder if the sudden rash of reports of "LCFC face record points deduction" are planted by clubs concerned they might lose their manager to us.
  14. More to do with the run of 5 wins at the end of season, beating teams they really ought to beat.
  15. So now that awfully corrupt sorry nice team Chelsea have been green lighted by the PFL to sell their assets (ie training ground) to a sister company and thus avoiding a points deduction, why can't KP do the same. Apologies if covered elsewhere
  16. Buy another club probably. I foresee a rich vein of cross investments and sponsorship deals that will be impossible to unravel.
  17. Can I win and donate it to UFS please
  18. He would have missed it
  19. Nah. Cos we won't have this team.
  20. Perfect Summary Perfect Storm
  21. Simplistic view I know, but why couldn't tribunals say £x plus say 20% of any sell on. QPR would the have received £450 plus £10m later
  22. Martyn Waghorn scored for Derby yesterday
  23. Yes, but will it count towards FFP total?
  24. That's just put an image in my head that I really really don't want.
×
×
  • Create New...