Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Tommy G

Member
  • Posts

    12,002
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Tommy G

  1. They are due at the end of March. Outside the club the only people that will know are the auditors
  2. Nope - reading all this drivel is painful enough
  3. No one does apart from the board and our auditors as it stands
  4. The accounts will be out in about a month and I think I’ll refrain from even opening the thread - too painful to read the commentary.
  5. So by your logic it’s Tops fault rather than Rudkins? Which completely contradicts your first point.
  6. This is half the problem with this forum - people speculate and throw stuff out there like it’s fact and others lap it up. A training ground that cost a huundred million does not have running costs of “tens of millions” Honestly
  7. Do you honestly think he has the sole responsibility for agreeing multi million pound contracts without an agreement or sanction from SW or Top. There will be a DLA in place like most businesses, as much as he’s not very good at his job to just say he’s responsible is daft and ignorant.
  8. Probably - or it’s rudkins fault which is the default opinion!
  9. No one really knows for sure but like I said we are in real squeaky bum territory
  10. EFL wanted us to submit a business plan, and we disagreed, it was referred to the independent CFRP which agreed with LCFC. To conclude I think reading between the lines we are absolutely on the brink of some kind of potential penalty/points deduction. Promotion is massive or we are ducked.
  11. Correct - percentage of most blokes wanting to give her a rodgering is 95%
  12. Laura Trott currently sitting nex to to Rishi giggling during the budget - bit of political totty
  13. Be a good excuse for Harry to back out of it
  14. 7 wins? Really. It will be less than that
  15. You cheeky git! This happened about a 5 mins walk from where I live - certainly shook a few people up. ps the village is fine, the areas closer to Hinckley are a bit more rough but nowhere near the saff or new parks
  16. Don’t want to see Enzo smiling away in the post match pressure saying 1 point gained when we come away with a 1-1 draw
  17. Worst post of 2024 so far
  18. Why on earth would you want to get Nigel Pearson appointed to the board. I presume this is a wind up?
  19. Correct. The majority shareholders appoint the directors, so effectively in LCFC's case Top could sack the lot tomorrow and reinstate.
  20. The majority of ''family run business'' are SME's though, this isn't. Most of the directors will also very likely be the majority or 100% shareholders, so they don't have to answer to anyone. Slightly different in this case, much bigger business - has a governing body to answer to, banks to answer to, a board of directors with NEDs who aren't shareholders. I get your point but I think we can agree its speculation.
  21. Well it does, ultimately the directors of the business discharge what is happening in 99% of businesses. We know who runs the club, just not sure how much influence they have is a separate topic - which is al just purely speculation.
  22. He can't make the team any worse, just hope he gets up to speed quickly and can stay injury free for 10 games....needs wrapping in cotton wool!
  23. But this topic is about who's in charge of the club. Just look at the club webiste or companies house for 5 minutes and it's there, the rest is just hearsay thats covered in 5+ other threads on the forum.
  24. Another topic to add to the other 6 since losing 3 on the spin and still sitting pretty at the top of the league. We're up there with Cov in terms of weird fanbases
×
×
  • Create New...