ClaphamFox Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 According to Sky Sports News. Well that's one small victory I suppose
foxes_rule1978 Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 What do you mean? you mean they aren't going to ban Vardy for a further game? Because if it is that this is massive not small
Guest LCFC_World Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Does this mean Vardy only gets a one match ban? Naa he means in the tunnel. I wish it was this ...
st albans fox Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 This will be the other question. We already have JV's charge and failure to control our players. This one was the accusation that moss was verbally abused as he came into and through the tunnel area. Would only have been a fine if proven. Not much else they can do I would have thought given the video evidence that it wasn't much more than an aside.
FantasticMrFuchs Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 This is why i didn't post it: From Rob Dorset on TwitterSky Sources: FA will take no further action against any #lcfc officials after investigating allegations of abuse in tunnel to Ref John Moss
gdl9050 Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Tbh I'm starting to think this whole Moss hatred is going a bit too far now. 90% of people are in agreement that Vardy dived. Vardy got away with a bookable offence prior to the challenge he got booked for (was warned). West ham got dodgy penalty but then so did we (evened up)
ClaphamFox Posted 19 April 2016 Author Posted 19 April 2016 He clearly lied. The tunnel footage was up for a while before the club pulled it. The 'incident' in question was hardly worth the name - nothing in it. If nothing else it proves he was determined to screw us over by any means possible.
pSinatra Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Give me £80k a year & you can call me a cheating cvnt as often as you like. If someone had slapped him then fair enough, but a bit of name calling is to be expected surely? Man up you big girl's blouse.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 He clearly lied. The tunnel footage was up for a while before the club pulled it. The 'incident' in question was hardly worth the name - nothing in it. If nothing else it proves he was determined to screw us over by any means possible. Hope he is banned, preferably for life so no other club is unfortunate enough to have to deal with such an incapable and inconsistent ref
Mark_w Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Tbh I'm starting to think this whole Moss hatred is going a bit too far now. 90% of people are in agreement that Vardy dived. Vardy got away with a bookable offence prior to the challenge he got booked for (was warned). West ham got dodgy penalty but then so did we (evened up) West Ham got a dodgy penalty in the 84th minute when we were 1-0 up (we'd previously kept 5 consecutive clean sheets), we then didn't get a blatant penalty in stoppage time before finally getting a dodgy penalty at the end. We were given the opportunity to salvage a point after essentially being denied the chance of earning all three, it wasn't really evened up.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 West Ham got a dodgy penalty in the 84th minute when we were 1-0 up (we'd previously kept 5 consecutive clean sheets), we then didn't get a blatant penalty in stoppage time before finally getting a dodgy penalty at the end. We were given the opportunity to salvage a point after essentially being denied the chance of earning all three, it wasn't really evened up. Exactly this is true, but a draw for us actually was still decent and kept us in control... for West Ham it was pretty detrimental to their champions league hopes... so if I was a West Ham fan or player I would still feel hard done by. Moss was just a useless ref that completely ruined the game
Kitchandro Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Tbh I'm starting to think this whole Moss hatred is going a bit too far now. 90% of people are in agreement that Vardy dived. Vardy got away with a bookable offence prior to the challenge he got booked for (was warned). West ham got dodgy penalty but then so did we (evened up) In my experience 90% of people are morons. That's not an excuse for him to be another one. How did it even it up? We were winning when he gave West Ham's penalty. No idea what challenge you're referring to but it is irrelevant - the one Vardy was booked for was arguably not even a foul. No excuses for him, at best he's an unacceptably shocking referee who should never officiate again, at worst it's something more deliberate and sinister. And I'm tired of people laughing off the latter possibility as they were doing the very same thing when people suggested FIFA were corrupt 10-15 years ago.
inckley fox Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 He clearly imagined the misconduct charge against the players after the game, when he heard Carroll relating what Morgan had said to him. After all, there was no action whatsoever in the 83rd minute, not one booking for abusive language, threatening behaviour, holding up play, or otherwise. The obvious question is why he felt unable to take appropriate action at the time. If it was because he couldn't cope with the crowd, or a bunch of players saying it was the incorrect decision (and if Vardy's contact+dive was a yellow, and if Huth's penalty wasn't a penalty, then it was the incorrect decision) then that effectively means that he can't cope with the sort of pressure typically presented on these occasions. And if that's the case, as it is, I have no idea why anybody would take his report seriously.
gdl9050 Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 In my experience 90% of people are morons. That's not an excuse for him to be another one. How did it even it up? We were winning when he gave West Ham's penalty. No idea what challenge you're referring to but it is irrelevant - the one Vardy was booked for was arguably not even a foul. No excuses for him, at best he's an unacceptably shocking referee who should never officiate again, at worst it's something more deliberate and sinister. And I'm tired of people laughing off the latter possibility as they were doing the very same thing when people suggested FIFA were corrupt 10-15 years ago. Well I'm pretty sure West ham would have scored anyway even if there penalty wasn't given. We couldn't keep the ball at all and the pressure would have eventually told.
ClaphamFox Posted 19 April 2016 Author Posted 19 April 2016 Well I'm pretty sure West ham would have scored anyway even if there penalty wasn't given. We couldn't keep the ball at all and the pressure would have eventually told. Absolute nonsense. They certainly were putting pressure on but we were dealing with it comfortably. The penalty was the turning point.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Absolute nonsense. They certainly were putting pressure on but we were dealing with it comfortably. The penalty was the turning point. Agreed, even with 10 men we scored... the penalty got their tails up and was the only opportunity they carved out up to that point.
los dedos Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Well I'm pretty sure West ham would have scored anyway even if there penalty wasn't given. We couldn't keep the ball at all and the pressure would have eventually told. Yea we do struggle to keep clean sheets these days.
fuchsntf Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Vardy is the FAs Bogeyman All refs are the fans natural bogeymen. Just like me, I am foxforums bogeyman. Only King Richard understands and loves me..
Mark_w Posted 19 April 2016 Posted 19 April 2016 Well I'm pretty sure West ham would have scored anyway even if there penalty wasn't given. We couldn't keep the ball at all and the pressure would have eventually told. It's useless speculating too much about what might have happened in the remaining 6 minutes and stoppage time, but our recent defensive record is incredible. You can't just say 'we would have conceded anyway' and expect people to go along with that, we could have countered from that corner and grabbed a second. The point is we don't know because we were denied it by a woeful refereeing decision. Making a stupid decision is bad enough, but he then makes one more stupid decisions when he doesn't give us the penalty for Huth and probably another bad one when he gives the penalty for Schlupp. Three incorrect huge decisions in six minutes and stoppage time is a pretty special level of incompetence for a Premier League referee regardless of what you think about the rest of his bizarre game.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.