Finnegan Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 None. Sterling and Sturridge are probably more technically gifted than everyone except Riyad. Means nothing, though, none of them are "Leicester players."
Guest LCFC_World Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Yeah i'd much rather have Okazaki than Kane. His work rate off the ball is something that has contributed towards out title win, and it seems to have gone unnoticed. Can you imagine Kane doing that every week?
sylofox Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Sterling might actually be decent with our counter-attacking style. Since we set back deep, there would be a lot of space for him to run down the channels. But I wouldn't drop Albrighton or Mahrez given how well they played last season. Sterling lol Runs into brick walls has no fvcking clue when to pass or cross. Then cries when it don't go his way also gets tired and needs to rest. He might be ok playing once a week in an under 16's side. He should never have started last night very lucky for the peno. He had lost control of the ball and was wank the rest of the game. At least him being so bad ment Woy is gone.
BenTheFox Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Spot on. Last night he was useless. And I mean useless. I think he's very over rated personally. Kante is a much better ball winning CM and quicker at getting forward. I'd take Drinkwater over Dier. I'd probably take Drinkwater over Dier for the style of football that we play, but I think Dier is a better footballer.
Finnegan Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Sterling would frustrate the **** out of me more than Schlupp or Dyer tbh. He's also a snide little diving, cheating cvnt that I'd never want to see in a city shirt.
EGBFitness Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Where's all this Dier love come from this tournament!? He has been so hyped up. Apart from his free kick against Russia he has done **** all! He cant make a long pass to save his life and he only looks back or across when he has all the time in the world to create something. Very poor IMO. Not being biased but this is why Drinky should of gone, he will do the nitty gritty jobs like Dier but Drinky can pick a pass and play the kind of Pirlo role that was asked of Dier. When you are playing against possession based teams and no you are going to have to defend - Germany, Italy, France, Spain etc then yes, Dier could of been useful but we have played every game that tournament against teams who don't want to step foot into our half so Dier has became useless
Merging Cultures Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Dier, Kane, walker. Apart from that, I genuinely don't see any of them getting in our side. Maybe Alli too Alli is a cvnt. He wouldn't fit with the team.
EGBFitness Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 But players I would take for our team - Vardy - Obvs Walker - Upgrade on the wing back options we have, solid tournament too. Rose - Same as Walker. Alternative option to Fuchs That is literally it.
foxes21 Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 I'd probably take Drinkwater over Dier for the style of football that we play, but I think Dier is a better footballer. Drinkwater has a better engine, quicker, more agile, more mobile, better at passing, better at reading the game, tackling, intercepting, can attack, can defend & his positioning to play in a 2 is fantastic. Drinkwater is basically superior in every aspect, maybe Dier is better at heading & passing it sideways & between the defence
Merging Cultures Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Sterling would frustrate the **** out of me more than Schlupp or Dyer tbh. He's also a snide little diving, cheating cvnt that I'd never want to see in a city shirt. Especially if we spent £50m on him!!
BenTheFox Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Drinkwater has a better engine, quicker, more agile, more mobile, better at passing, better at reading the game, tackling, intercepting, can attack, can defend & his positioning to play in a 2 is fantastic. Drinkwater is basically superior in every aspect, maybe Dier is better at heading & passing it sideways & between the defence I genuinely think Dier is better at those attributes highlighted. It's Drinkwater's engine that makes him a better fit for us.
LanguedocFox Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 I like Lallana, who strikes me as playing our style of football, but all of them need a manager who knows how to use them - and Hodgson simply didn't know how to do it. I wonder what happened to Kane at the Euros. Aside from being asked to do things he shouldn't (like take corners and spot kicks rather than getting on the end of them) his all-round game was worse than a pub footballer after a heavy night out. He was excellent most of last season and the season before, so where did it all go wrong?
foxes21 Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 I genuinely think Dier is better at those attributes highlighted. It's Drinkwater's engine that makes him a better fit for us. tackling/intercepting can be argued i guess. but dier is definitely no way near drinkwaters level of reading the game & range of passing.
BenTheFox Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 tackling/intercepting can be argued i guess. but dier is definitely no way near drinkwaters level of reading the game & range of passing. What can I tell you? I like Eric Dier. In truth I think Drinkwater was playing better for us before he got his England call up. Ever since then he has become a bit shakier on the ball and has been caught in possession a few times. He still played well for us, but I think he was much better up until around mid-March time.
Larry_LCFC Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Wouldn't let Sterling near our team, even on a free. His pace is great, but my god, he has a final product worse than Lloyd Dyer. He is infuriating to watch and seriously overrates himself. He can stick his ego.
Cheese Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Wouldn't let Sterling near our team, even on a free. His pace is great, but my god, he has a final product worse than Lloyd Dyer. He is infuriating to watch and seriously overrates himself. He can stick his ego. I thought Lloyd Dyer had quite a good end product.
Westlife Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 I'd have Rashford for when Okazaki has ran himself into the ground for 65 minutes . . .
Larry_LCFC Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 I thought Lloyd Dyer had quite a good end product. His crossing left something to be desired most of the time. Atleast Lloyd was loveable.
BenTheFox Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 His crossing left something to be desired most of the time. Atleast Lloyd was loveable. He used to charge down the left quicker than anyone you'll ever see and then put in some cross that'd end up in row Z. I loved him to bits though.
Larry_LCFC Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 a bunch of overpaid nonces God knows how they got away saying that!
Kitchandro Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 Some of you people are absolutely cretinous. Dier would get in ahead of Drinkwater and Kante? Kane would get in ahead of Okazaki. Possibly Walker over Simpson. That's it. If you think anything otherwise you're a nob.
Stadt Posted 28 June 2016 Posted 28 June 2016 God knows how they got away saying that! it's how the newsreader repeats in disbelief that kills me
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.