simFox Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 Maguire is proving solid in defence, why not play a back 3? We have more depth in midfield and plenty of attacking options, we should use them. Discuss.
Carl the Llama Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 We need more depth at CB if you want to play 3 of them.
Koke Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 We can't draw many conclusions from today's game. Brighton looked out of their depth and we won't have an easier game all season.
les-tah Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 if you wanna play 3 at the back you need to sign 2 more defenders to start with maguire
Osavo Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 Why change a formula that appears to be working well? Think we've looked very good in a 4-4-2 in the first 2 games.
Bryn Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 The scary thing here is you seem to think that a back three is a centre back and two full backs.
ajthefox Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 We don't really have proper wing backs on either side or enough depth to play with 3 CBs. Albrighton and Fuchs could be the full backs but it would be a little square peg/round hole. If you went 3-5-2 I would quite like to see Vards and Nacho/Shinji up top with Riyad behind them in the middle though.
yorkie1999 Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 That game was Morgan's level, one sloppy backpass in the 2nd half, a quicker striker would have been in on that.
Guest CityFan 06 Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 Please no more Simpson is the weak link or anything of that ilk. He's consistently excellent at RB.
Guest Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 1 hour ago, CityFan 06 said: Please no more Simpson is the weak link or anything of that ilk. He's consistently excellent at RB. He's a weak link. Him fuchs and Morgan are worrying.
leicesterlad1989 Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 We don't need a back 4. Just a back 1. MAGUIRE.
m4DD0gg Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 1 hour ago, Ian996 said: Maguire is proving solid in defence, why not play a back 3? We have more depth in midfield and plenty of attacking options, we should use them. Discuss. Dude we played Brighton who were total dogshite. Re watch the arsenal game.
davieG Posted 19 August 2017 Posted 19 August 2017 1 hour ago, CityFan 06 said: Please no more Simpson is the weak link or anything of that ilk. He's consistently excellent at RB. Just as I turned to my son to say Simpson's having a good a game he passed the ball straight to a Brighton player not 10 feet away
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.