I don't know who to hate more.

[Gerard]

8 hours ago, sylofox said:

He's worth what someone will pay not our valuation. If city did offer £65m we should have took it. We will be lucky to get £50m for the sulky tw@ this summer.

 

With this attitude you'd have been happy to accept £30m from Roma in the summer.

 

Mahrez is our player for another 2.5 years if we wish. We're entitled to value him however much we want and not be told by another club how much he is worth.

[splinterdream]

It's also very annoying when I keep hearing different figures of what we offered by Man City. Talksport saying we were offered £65m plus a £30m player today

[stripeyfox]

19 hours ago, SkidsFox said:

Pep moneybags, Mahrez, or our players who can't hold it together when the star player is being enticed elsewhere.

Way off the mark pal.

 

What did Pep do? What did Man City do? Two parties tried to strike a deal and couldn't agree terms. 

There's no evidence that the off field events directly contributed to us losing last night. 

 

 

[murphy]

1 minute ago, stripeyfox said:

Way off the mark pal.

 

What did Pep do? What did Man City do? Two parties tried to strike a deal and couldn't agree terms. 

There's no evidence that the off field events directly contributed to us losing last night. 

 

 

You mean apart from our best player not showing up? 

[stripeyfox]

Just now, murphy said:

You mean apart from our best player not showing up? 

well, yes, but the point the OP made was that they (the players who did play) couldn't hold it together in his absence.

 

 

 

 

[murphy]

1 minute ago, stripeyfox said:

well, yes, but the point the OP made was that they (the players who did play) couldn't hold it together in his absence.

 

 

 

 

Well we'll never know for sure, not possible to find the 'evidence' you mention, but in my opinion, the disruption contributed to the performance we saw last night.

 

I just hope there is a reaction v Swansea.

[ARM1968]

34 minutes ago, murphy said:

Well we'll never know for sure, not possible to find the 'evidence' you mention, but in my opinion, the disruption contributed to the performance we saw last night.

 

I just hope there is a reaction v Swansea.

Weren’t we hoping for a reaction last night?

 

unfortunateky what I feared occurred. Lacklustre performance. 

[urban.spaceman]

It appears the Algerians are still furious. 

 

[Tielemans63]

I hate Sky Sports News for doing their level best to 'create' news and where they can't create news, to pour petrol over already potentially awkward situations. Their bullshit helps no-one.

[ARM1968]

16 minutes ago, Paddy. said:

I hate Sky Sports News for doing their level best to 'create' news and where they can't create news, to pour petrol over already potentially awkward situations. Their bullshit helps no-one.

Same as Sky news with all their ‘opinion’ pieces. I always thought that ‘news’ was simply a report of factual occurrences. Now it appears that they make the news, decide what is news and then spin it all in the direction they want. It really is pathetic. 

[Tielemans63]

33 minutes ago, ARM1968 said:

Same as Sky news with all their ‘opinion’ pieces. I always thought that ‘news’ was simply a report of factual occurrences. Now it appears that they make the news, decide what is news and then spin it all in the direction they want. It really is pathetic. 

Absolutely mate. The need to fill up 24 hours of 'news' has been the death knell for actual news. Some of the shit they broadcast to fill the time is frankly an insult.

Edited 1 February 2018 by Paddy.