How does Leicester fans view multi-club ownership? (Survey)

[multiclub.thesis]

Hi!

 

We are two business administration students who are currently writing our degree project. As our topic of choice, we opted to study multi-club ownership within professional football clubs as we’ve personally seen an influx of this structure. Consequently, we’re gathering input from football fans to take note of their views and to be aided in locating these multi-club connections. Please take two minutes two answer our short survey (we will later publish our findings) and enrich the Leicester fanbase on your views!

 

Survey link:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfnWNN1D8T4PKzjF48rK7FqmQEPMjoCc4Ify1aWola7Z5IByA/viewform?usp=sf_link

 

We're very appreciative of your help, cheers!

Edited 19 March 2021 by multiclub.thesis
Did not emphasize our gratefulness enough

[Bourbon Fox]

Done 

[holyfox]

Done!

[trabuch]

Do! 

[sacreblueits442]

1 hour ago, multiclub.thesis said:

Hi!

 

We are two business administration students who are currently writing our degree project. As our topic of choice, we opted to study multi-club ownership within professional football clubs as we’ve personally seen an influx of this structure. Consequently, we’re gathering input from football fans to take note of their views and to be aided in locating these multi-club connections. Please take two minutes two answer our short survey (we will later publish our findings) and enrich the Leicester fanbase on your views!

 

Survey link:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfnWNN1D8T4PKzjF48rK7FqmQEPMjoCc4Ify1aWola7Z5IByA/viewform?usp=sf_link

 

We're very appreciative of your help, cheers!

....not too convinced about this, you sure you have spent any real time at a place of higher learning!!!

[09bballer]

Done

[ozleicester]

how many do own more?

[Webbo]

39 minutes ago, ozleicester said:

how many do own more?

I guessed 6 but I have no idea. 

[ozleicester]

9 minutes ago, Webbo said:

I guessed 6 but I have no idea. 

i guessed 25

[multiclub.thesis]

9 hours ago, sacreblueits442 said:

....not too convinced about this, you sure you have spent any real time at a place of higher learning!!!

Don't you worry, this survey is not intended to be empirically tested. It merely acts as background information and triangulation of multi-club connections which we subsequently will use in guiding our structured research. Nonetheless, thanks for your concerns!

[multiclub.thesis]

1 hour ago, Webbo said:

I guessed 6 but I have no idea. 

We've seen guesses ranging from 1 to 42 so there's a great variance in responses!

[multiclub.thesis]

2 hours ago, ozleicester said:

how many do own more?

We'll submit our findings later on as no-one has ever compiled this information as far as we're aware. It will likely take a while so please stay patient

[multiclub.thesis]

Finally it is time to report the findings!

 

Results were rather inconclusive as neither sporting- nor financial performance had a direct relationship with being a Multi-club portfolio member [MCPM] (i.e. a club with owners that holds significant stakes in other clubs). Although, these clubs tended to utilise international markets to a wider extent in player trading activity than clubs that had an isolated owner. In turn, inclination to use international trading markets hade positive effects on both sporting- and financial performance thereby suggesting an indirect benefit of a club being an MCPM.

 

Findings connected to the survey can be found in Section 1.1 and Appendix 1, in which the latter investigates each club that competed in the EPL or Championship during the 14/15-18/19 seasons. Unfortunately an error seem to have occurred in one of the Leicester-cells in Appendix 1, the error is rather apparent so please just disregard it. The study is available through the following link (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1573014&dswid=-8476). Once more, thank you for your participation it was truly appreciated.

 

Best regards, Authors

[whoareyaaa]

2 minutes ago, multiclub.thesis said:

Finally it is time to report the findings!

 

Results were rather inconclusive as neither sporting- nor financial performance had a direct relationship with being a Multi-club portfolio member [MCPM] (i.e. a club with owners that holds significant stakes in other clubs). Although, these clubs tended to utilise international markets to a wider extent in player trading activity than clubs that had an isolated owner. In turn, inclination to use international trading markets hade positive effects on both sporting- and financial performance thereby suggesting an indirect benefit of a club being an MCPM.

 

Findings connected to the survey can be found in Section 1.1 and Appendix 1, in which the latter investigates each club that competed in the EPL or Championship during the 14/15-18/19 seasons. Unfortunately an error seem to have occurred in one of the Leicester-cells in Appendix 1, the error is rather apparent so please just disregard it. The study is available through the following link (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1573014&dswid=-8476). Once more, thank you for your participation it was truly appreciated.

 

Best regards, Authors

 nothing can stop us gods work.

[sacreblueits442]

1 hour ago, multiclub.thesis said:

Finally it is time to report the findings!

 

Results were rather inconclusive as neither sporting- nor financial performance had a direct relationship with being a Multi-club portfolio member [MCPM] (i.e. a club with owners that holds significant stakes in other clubs). Although, these clubs tended to utilise international markets to a wider extent in player trading activity than clubs that had an isolated owner. In turn, inclination to use international trading markets hade positive effects on both sporting- and financial performance thereby suggesting an indirect benefit of a club being an MCPM.

 

Findings connected to the survey can be found in Section 1.1 and Appendix 1, in which the latter investigates each club that competed in the EPL or Championship during the 14/15-18/19 seasons. Unfortunately an error seem to have occurred in one of the Leicester-cells in Appendix 1, the error is rather apparent so please just disregard it. The study is available through the following link (http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1573014&dswid=-8476). Once more, thank you for your participation it was truly appreciated.

 

Best regards, Authors

...I  know it is the format for such things, but the problem with "academic writing" is the tendency for readers to get bored, and switch off!!!

The topic is an interesting look at something that affects this club but ploughing through this would only appeal to the people grading the work.

 Good luck, hope your grades are what you hoped  they would be.

[DANGEROUS TIGER]

On 20/03/2021 at 00:21, sacreblueits442 said:

....not too convinced about this, you sure you have spent any real time at a place of higher learning!!!

Title should be how do, not "how does." I'm with you on this. 

[OntarioFox]

On 20/03/2021 at 06:04, multiclub.thesis said:

Don't you worry, this survey is not intended to be empirically tested. It merely acts as background information and triangulation of multi-club connections which we subsequently will use in guiding our structured research. Nonetheless, thanks for your concerns!

So what you're saying is... blame Wellens? 

[MPH]

On 19/03/2021 at 19:50, Bourbon Fox said:

Done 

 

On 19/03/2021 at 20:04, holyfox said:

Done!

 

On 20/03/2021 at 02:49, 09bballer said:

Done

 Patson Daka!