Stevosevic Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 (edited) New podcast now available. May interest a few. Edited 20 February 2023 by Stevosevic 2
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 11 minutes ago, Stevosevic said: New podcast now available. May interest a few. Undr the cosh Patreon subscriber. He is the stain on our title winning team. Should have been sacked. 1
coolhandfox Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 Just now, westernpark said: Undr the cosh Patreon subscriber. He is the stain on our title winning team. Should have been sacked. Why that then?
Popular Post Koke Posted 20 February 2023 Popular Post Posted 20 February 2023 Time stamp the interesting parts please. Can't stomach the lad bantz on there. 6
coolhandfox Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 1 minute ago, Koke said: Time stamp the interesting parts please. Can't stomach the lad bantz on there. I agree, puts me off too.
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said: Why that then? Because he was found guilty of assaulting a woman, whilst playing for us.
Tielemans63 Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said: Why that then? Think he faced a DA charge during his time here. I guess that's what he's referring to
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 Actually I apologise for commenting, it’s my personal view that I don’t want people who are convicted of that sort of assault whilst at the club, then being allowed to play for the club. I realise others have different views. I don’t want an argument because it doesn’t help anyone. 1
coolhandfox Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 2 minutes ago, westernpark said: Because he was found guilty of assaulting a woman, whilst playing for us. Fair enough, indefensible. But I assume the club felt he served his sentence and gave him a chance of redemption. What you thoughts on Steve Walsh?
coolhandfox Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 1 minute ago, westernpark said: Actually I apologise for commenting, it’s my personal view that I don’t want people who are convicted of that sort of assault whilst at the club, then being allowed to play for the club. I realise others have different views. I don’t want an argument because it doesn’t help anyone. It a fair point of view, that's what a forum is about, no need to apologise. I don't like it either but people make mistakes and have to learn from them. It about education and reform for me. 3
Out Foxed Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said: It a fair point of view, that's what a forum is about, no need to apologise. I don't like it either but people make mistakes and have to learn from them. It about education and reform for me. yep - confident vichai would have turfed him if he thought he was a full on scumbag. 1
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 1 minute ago, coolhandfox said: It a fair point of view, that's what a forum is about, no need to apologise. I don't like it either but people make mistakes and have to learn from them. It about education and reform for me. Danny Simpson should have been sacked from whatever club he was at. Football works differently, but I will always be disappointed that he wasn’t sacked by us. He is used as an example of failure by football club nationally. Of course probation and retribution is important, but being properly punished is also. We wouldn’t have won the league without him, but I hate that we didn’t sack him. As for your previous point on Steve Walsh, I am unsure as to what you’re referring to specifically, but I wouldn’t give him the time of day.
Tommy Fresh Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 19 minutes ago, Koke said: Time stamp the interesting parts please. Can't stomach the lad bantz on there. The talk on there is what makes it interesting, be arsed to listen to pretentious ex pro's talk tactics.
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 20 minutes ago, Tielemans63 said: Think he faced a DA charge during his time here. I guess that's what he's referring to Faced? Found guilty. 1
coolhandfox Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, westernpark said: Danny Simpson should have been sacked from whatever club he was at. Football works differently, but I will always be disappointed that he wasn’t sacked by us. He is used as an example of failure by football club nationally. Of course probation and retribution is important, but being properly punished is also. We wouldn’t have won the league without him, but I hate that we didn’t sack him. As for your previous point on Steve Walsh, I am unsure as to what you’re referring to specifically, but I wouldn’t give him the time of day. Steve was assaulted David Geddis on the football pitch resulting in a 11 match ban, but is hero worshipped. To me assault is assault irrelevant of whether they are male or female. So just wondered how you felt about that. I supposed should footballer be held to a higher standard then a bin man or factory worker who more then likely would keep their job. Interesting one to debate. Edited 20 February 2023 by coolhandfox
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 6 minutes ago, coolhandfox said: Steve was assaulted David Geddis on the football pitch resulting in a 11 match ban, but is hero worshipped. To me assault is assault irrelevant of whether they are male or female. So just wondered how you felt about that. I supposed should footballer be held to a higher standard then a bin man or factory worker who more then likely would keep their job. Interesting one to debate. It is definitely! Just for me Danny Simpson should have been sacked by whomever his employer was at the time. Probation should have started from that point. I am saddened when I see his name, with our legends of 2015/2016.
Stevosevic Posted 20 February 2023 Author Posted 20 February 2023 14 minutes ago, westernpark said: Danny Simpson should have been sacked from whatever club he was at. Football works differently, but I will always be disappointed that he wasn’t sacked by us. He is used as an example of failure by football club nationally. Of course probation and retribution is important, but being properly punished is also. We wouldn’t have won the league without him, but I hate that we didn’t sack him. As for your previous point on Steve Walsh, I am unsure as to what you’re referring to specifically, but I wouldn’t give him the time of day. Sacking a player only punishes the club that sacks them. You’re basically giving away a multi million pound asset to another club for free…there’s no logic. If you want to remove a player then you sell them - you don’t sack them.
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 Just now, Stevosevic said: Sacking a player only punishes the club that sacks them. You’re basically giving away a multi million pound asset to another club for free…there’s no logic. If you want to remove a player then you sell them - you don’t sack them. You sack them because it’s right thing to do regardless of the money!
Will1981 Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 4 minutes ago, westernpark said: You sack them because it’s right thing to do regardless of the money! When we sacked Wise correctly for assaulting a teammate the scumbag sued us for wrongful dismissal and won and got a huge pay out from us, so it is not that simple.
Stevosevic Posted 20 February 2023 Author Posted 20 February 2023 7 minutes ago, westernpark said: You sack them because it’s right thing to do regardless of the money! It’s business mate. You don’t give away millions of pounds to a club you’re competing with.
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 1 minute ago, Stevosevic said: It’s business mate. You don’t give away millions of pounds to a club you’re competing with. I don’t agree with this logic when someone is found guilty of domestic assault. He should have been sacked, forget what other clubs want to do with him. Shame on us! And most probably football in general.
westernpark Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 5 minutes ago, Will1981 said: When we sacked Wise correctly for assaulting a teammate the scumbag sued us for wrongful dismissal and won and got a huge pay out from us, so it is not that simple. It is easier when someone has been convicted in a court of law.
Bert Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 It’s a 2 parter. Very little about us in the first part.
marbles Posted 20 February 2023 Posted 20 February 2023 34 minutes ago, westernpark said: It is easier when someone has been convicted in a court of law. So, what do you feel the full extent of his punishment should have been? Probation+Termination? Anything else?
Recommended Posts