AKCJ Posted 6 September 2023 Posted 6 September 2023 2 minutes ago, Finnegan said: Clubs tend to pay higher wages to free agents cos they don't have to lump up a fee and there is more of a bidding war. He's probably confident of a decent contract somewhere once he's done here. Absolutely, I was just refuting the point (not necessarily your point) that Vestergaard shouldn't/won't leave because of the money he's on here and that he wouldn't get the same elsewhere. 1
Babylon Posted 6 September 2023 Posted 6 September 2023 1 hour ago, AKCJ said: Yeah nobody ever seems to criticise John Rudkin. He didn't choose a duff player either.
Chelmofox Posted 6 September 2023 Posted 6 September 2023 1 hour ago, AKCJ said: No, but 20-30k a week on a 4 year deal is a lot better than 70k a week until June. He might be happy to gamble that he can better the 20-30k when he's a free agent. He might have not liked what was offer to him now for a variety of reasons. He might actually be enjoying his football right now (the way he celebrated the goal at Rotherham tells me he gives a sh1t).
AKCJ Posted 6 September 2023 Posted 6 September 2023 4 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: He might be happy to gamble that he can better the 20-30k when he's a free agent. He might have not liked what was offer to him now for a variety of reasons. He might actually be enjoying his football right now (the way he celebrated the goal at Rotherham tells me he gives a sh1t). Completely agree. I just think there's this feeling amongst the fanbase that he's only here for the money whereas it's probable that he could get a better deal elsewhere.
Tommy G Posted 6 September 2023 Posted 6 September 2023 1 hour ago, AKCJ said: No, but 20-30k a week on a 4 year deal is a lot better than 70k a week until June. Not really no, his agent will be confident to get more than 20-30K a week as a free agent. By your sums he would lose out on 40K a week at best, over the 10 months thats about £1.7m. He will leave us on a free and probably get a contract in the region of £40-£50K p/w or more if Saudi, plus a hefty signing on fee. No brainer 1
TheStig Posted 6 September 2023 Posted 6 September 2023 In my humble opinion the only thing he should get is ----OUT
adejo92 Posted 7 September 2023 Posted 7 September 2023 (edited) Should get rid & get Phil Jones in on a free until we find a more permanent option. Edited 7 September 2023 by adejo92
Scotch Posted 7 September 2023 Posted 7 September 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, adejo92 said: Should get rid & get Phil Jones in on a free until we find a more permanent option. He's not. Re-signed for Utd. Edit. Just saw that he's not signed, he's just hanging around the academy like a creepy uncle. Edited 7 September 2023 by Scotch 3
Clever Fox Posted 14 September 2023 Posted 14 September 2023 On 07/09/2023 at 17:08, adejo92 said: Should get rid & get Phil Jones in on a free until we find a more permanent option. No, We have enough slow players. I'd sooner give Ben Nelson his big chance.He's young and suits the syle Enzo wants to play. 3
Recommended Posts