Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

Clubs tend to pay higher wages to free agents cos they don't have to lump up a fee and there is more of a bidding war. He's probably confident of a decent contract somewhere once he's done here. 

Absolutely, I was just refuting the point (not necessarily your point) that Vestergaard shouldn't/won't leave because of the money he's on here and that he wouldn't get the same elsewhere.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AKCJ said:

No, but 20-30k a week on a 4 year deal is a lot better than 70k a week until June.

He might be happy to gamble that he can better the 20-30k when he's a free agent. He might have not liked what was offer to him now for a variety of reasons. He might actually be enjoying his football right now (the way he celebrated the goal at Rotherham tells me he gives a sh1t). 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

He might be happy to gamble that he can better the 20-30k when he's a free agent. He might have not liked what was offer to him now for a variety of reasons. He might actually be enjoying his football right now (the way he celebrated the goal at Rotherham tells me he gives a sh1t). 

Completely agree.

 

I just think there's this feeling amongst the fanbase that he's only here for the money whereas it's probable that he could get a better deal elsewhere.

Posted
1 hour ago, AKCJ said:

No, but 20-30k a week on a 4 year deal is a lot better than 70k a week until June.

Not really no, his agent will be confident to get more than 20-30K a week as a free agent. By your sums he would lose out on 40K a week at best, over the 10 months thats about £1.7m. He will leave us on a free and probably get a contract in the region of £40-£50K p/w or more if Saudi, plus a hefty signing on fee. No brainer  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, adejo92 said:

Should get rid & get Phil Jones in on a free until we find a more permanent option. 

:ph34r:

He's not. Re-signed for Utd. 

 

Edit. 

Just saw that he's not signed, he's just hanging around the academy like a creepy uncle. 

Edited by Scotch
  • Haha 3
Posted
On 07/09/2023 at 17:08, adejo92 said:

Should get rid & get Phil Jones in on a free until we find a more permanent option. 

:ph34r:

No, We have enough slow players.

 

I'd sooner give Ben Nelson his big chance.He's young and suits the syle Enzo wants to play.

  • Like 3
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...