King Power Out

[funkyrobot]

1 hour ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Seagrave

 

A waste of a perfectly good golf course

My memories of it is that it was a characterless, bang average, windswept golf course. Now it’s a windswept training ground for coaching characterless bang average players. 

[Blue ROI]

Will we get Project Reset 2.0 before the seasons out?

[Foxin_Mad]

Whatever the protest is it needs to impact the people involved. Literally the do not care if a few people march outside or stand outside whilst they are enjoying prawns and prossecco. It makes no difference to their experience, to their lives. They need to be impacted. 

[HP1]

2 hours ago, ozvaldo said:

The flask willy pullers will be there. 

And vociferously applauding the pre match montage again.

 

Never ceases to amaze me that these people can bang their hands to together, in total awe of events which took place a decade ago whilst the club is currently in dire straits, is getting worse and may never recover.

 

For some it seems to be just a virtue signalling exercise as they seem to look around at others while they do it, as if to say "look at me im a true fan".

Edited 12 April by HP1

[Ethan RL]

1 hour ago, Paninistickers said:

I keep banging on and on and it's proved to have next to no interest from posters on here....but for anything above 20 people to get west stand seats as close to the director box as possible and let the empty chair see some real hostility for the first time ever. 

 

It needn't be aggressive or abusive. Just standing there eyeballing the club management.....it would be extremely effective and the create the maximum amount of discomfort. More so  than a rabble outside kettled by stewards. 

Agreed. This is what we need now. I went to the protest pre Norwich game and yeah it was loud and vocal but when there's none of the hierarchy to direct disgruntlement towards it does kinda decrease the effect of the protest.

 

Going to the west stand seats and showing even a fraction of hostility would be more effective. In my opinion, it has to be at a game where Aiyawatt is there. My expectations of him are extremely low but I do feel that he will be at one of our final two home games. Surely.

 

What West Ham did in 2017 I think it was, if we could get even a fraction of that it would be brilliant. Sadly our fanbase is full of KPFC loyalists and nowhere near as vocal as West Ham's, but if we could generate a scene even remotely similar to what West Ham had then it would be perfect. Would require swift organisation though as time is running out this season.

 

Most definitely the best option though and best way of getting through to them. What West Ham did back then should be an example of what we need to do. Like you mate I am baffled as to why people haven't caught onto this yet.

[South Shire Fox]

11 minutes ago, Ethan RL said:

Agreed. This is what we need now. I went to the protest pre Norwich game and yeah it was loud and vocal but when there's none of the hierarchy to direct disgruntlement towards it does kinda decrease the effect of the protest.

 

Going to the west stand seats and showing even a fraction of hostility would be more effective. In my opinion, it has to be at a game where Aiyawatt is there. My expectations of him are extremely low but I do feel that he will be at one of our final two home games. Surely.

 

What West Ham did in 2017 I think it was, if we could get even a fraction of that it would be brilliant. Sadly our fanbase is full of KPFC loyalists and nowhere near as vocal as West Ham's, but if we could generate a scene even remotely similar to what West Ham had then it would be perfect. Would require swift organisation though as time is running out this season.

 

Most definitely the best option though and best way of getting through to them. What West Ham did back then should be an example of what we need to do. Like you mate I am baffled as to why people haven't caught onto this yet.

They’ve still got the same ownership they want out mate

[Spanner73]

29 minutes ago, Blue ROI said:

Will we get Project Reset 2.0 before the seasons out?

No we’ll just mirror Aiyawatt by outstretching our arms, palms up to the sky as if to say “Well what can you do” ? which epitomises the owners efforts to get the club which is like a son to him by the way away from danger. 
 

Just sell up and F off 

[foxile5]

19 minutes ago, Ethan RL said:

Agreed. This is what we need now. I went to the protest pre Norwich game and yeah it was loud and vocal but when there's none of the hierarchy to direct disgruntlement towards it does kinda decrease the effect of the protest.

 

Going to the west stand seats and showing even a fraction of hostility would be more effective. In my opinion, it has to be at a game where Aiyawatt is there. My expectations of him are extremely low but I do feel that he will be at one of our final two home games. Surely.

 

What West Ham did in 2017 I think it was, if we could get even a fraction of that it would be brilliant. Sadly our fanbase is full of KPFC loyalists and nowhere near as vocal as West Ham's, but if we could generate a scene even remotely similar to what West Ham had then it would be perfect. Would require swift organisation though as time is running out this season.

 

Most definitely the best option though and best way of getting through to them. What West Ham did back then should be an example of what we need to do. Like you mate I am baffled as to why people haven't caught onto this yet.

I think you're right. 

 

Be prepared for 'real city fan' Jim and his muscle to remove and ban you though. It's gestapo stuff down there at the minute. 

[TamuffFox]

55 minutes ago, Philkeavo said:

A statue recognising his achievements and reflecting the manner of his death were the right thing do. It should however have been located in the memorial garden.
 

No surprise his idiot son would choose a scale and location that was not at all appropriate.

 

[Manwell Pablo]

2 hours ago, Kitchandro said:

Nope. He wasn’t the only person who died that night so it’s a moot argument for the statue.

 

it’s not a small shrine in the memorial garden. It’s a giant statue at the main entry point of the ground. It’s the thing everyone sees when they visit it, a position where most clubs put their biggest legend.

 

There are no ethical billionaires so I’m not interested in the posts suggesting it was his club or that he was some sort of hero for the club just because he wasn’t Aiyawatt. Being a more competent owner does not give you a right to be idolised and take credit for the club’s on field successes, which were a triumph of good scouting and tactics at the end of the day.

 

It’s not just about Top himself, it’s the principle of the club having some pride in itself as a local sports team, not pride in businessmen that run a business.

There are no ethical billionaires, wow,  😂 ok Josepeh Stalin.

 

i mean I could get lengthy but there’s not a lot of need. 
 

I put it to you that we wouldn’t even own the ground where that statue is if it wasn’t for him so what goes there and what doesn’t is far more down to him than a widely outspoken and renound keyboard warrior like you Kitch. 😂

[Ethan RL]

11 minutes ago, South Shire Fox said:

They’ve still got the same ownership they want out mate

All I said was what they did was brilliant. Made those above feel as unwelcome as possible. That for them it seems was a bit of a turning point and was a catalyst for gathering momentum. I wouldn't say as a fanbase we've even remotely directly expressed the same level of disgruntlement yet towards those in charge. That was the point I was trying to get at. And we've had a significantly larger fall from grace ffs.

 

The fact they have the same ownership isn't very relevant to the point I am making. It's about making them realise and feel as unwelcome and unwanted at our club as possible. I just feel we haven't done that yet very effectively. I am not saying this is what will make them sell, of course not. What follows in the future could prove to be a trigger for that, who knows.

 

In an ideal world, I see it as a starting point. The protests are good but I sometimes think to myself this is having little effect on those above which is why I think we are still at square 1. A more direct approach is required.

Edited 12 April by Ethan RL

[Pliskin]

Any reason why protests have got to Seagrave? 

[Ethan RL]

4 minutes ago, foxile5 said:

I think you're right. 

 

Be prepared for 'real city fan' Jim and his muscle to remove and ban you though. It's gestapo stuff down there at the minute. 

Yeah that's the issue. 

 

If it becomes clear that Aiyawatt is at a game then it would be great if like-minded fans could collectively unite and express disgruntlement directly towards those sitting in those seats above. 100 or so like-minded fans who actually care about the greater good of the football club in my eyes are more powerful than an army full of "Jim the real city fan".

[South Shire Fox]

8 minutes ago, Ethan RL said:

All I said was what they did was brilliant. Made those above feel as unwelcome as possible. That for them it seems was a bit of a turning point and was a catalyst for gathering momentum. I wouldn't say as a fanbase we've even remotely directly expressed the same level of disgruntlement yet towards those in charge. That was the point I was trying to get at. And we've had a significantly larger fall from grace ffs.

 

The fact they have the same ownership isn't very relevant to the point I am making. It's about making them realise and feel as unwelcome and unwanted at our club as possible. I just feel we haven't done that yet very effectively. I am not saying this is what will make them sell, of course not. What follows in the future could prove to be a trigger for that, who knows.

 

In an ideal world, I see it as a starting point. The protests are good but I sometimes think to myself this is having little effect on those above which is why I think we are still at square 1. A more direct approach is required.

Yeah and its made absolutley no difference as they are still there. Stop giving them your money, best way at making a point

Edited 12 April by South Shire Fox

[The Year Of The Fox]

7 minutes ago, Ethan RL said:

Yeah that's the issue. 

 

If it becomes clear that Aiyawatt is at a game then it would be great if like-minded fans could collectively unite and express disgruntlement directly towards those sitting in those seats above. 100 or so like-minded fans who actually care about the greater good of the football club in my eyes are more powerful than an army full of "Jim the real city fan".

He’s on about Jim at the club banning you 

[foxile5]

Just now, The Year Of The Fox said:

He’s on about Jim at the club banning you 

This. 

 

The fan liaison officer is called Jim and they've been banning people quite willingly recently. 

[Paninistickers]

12 minutes ago, foxile5 said:

I think you're right. 

 

Be prepared for 'real city fan' Jim and his muscle to remove and ban you though. It's gestapo stuff down there at the minute. 

For a start, you don't have to sit in the assigned seat. 

 

Second, what can muscle do if 20 or so we're disciplined enough to keep a lid on it, just keep it on the limit? 

 

That said, me buying a ticket for the first time in 18 months it wouldn't take much to work out

[Foxin_Mad]

6 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

For a start, you don't have to sit in the assigned seat. 

 

Second, what can muscle do if 20 or so we're disciplined enough to keep a lid on it, just keep it on the limit? 

 

That said, me buying a ticket for the first time in 18 months it wouldn't take much to work out

Exactly they can’t stop protesting if it’s reasonable, they can’t remove people without justification and if they did I’d welcome the court case, and take the little shit bag for all I could. 

[Manwell Pablo]

5 hours ago, LCFCJohn said:

Lots of sensible and fair comments.

 

Personally I think Vichai gets far too much credit when people put the success down to him. He wasn’t crap in that we were successful but you can’t say he was a knowledgable owner with a plan, such as Bloom at Brighton and Benham at Brentford. Their rises have come as a result of their owners. Ours was due to the manager and his team. Where you can credit Vichai is being able to admit his mistakes and taking decisive actions which his son is incapable of on both counts.

 

However, the culture of KP over LC and financial recklessness date back to Vichai. As others have said, hogging the trophy, removal of nods to our prior history, Thai king picture etc. Let’s be honest, we were probably all guilty of just not calling it out at the time because things were going well. But when things go wrong, it brings all this to light.

 

The statue should be in the memorial garden and I have said my piece on that enough before. 
 

Ultimately what has happened to the fan base is the worse bit. This cult devotion is embarrassing and a stain on the club. I can’t wish these fans away from the club fast enough. You just know if we had a new owner, these same people would be kicking off and behaving toxically.

People have very short and I feel biased memories when it comes to Vichai. 
 

And they tend to fixate on the fact that his ownership had very little to do with the PL win, which in fairness it didn’t. 
 

But at the same time forgetting what he did do was take a stagnant club with no money to the PL in the first place, and that was a lot to do with the ownership. You can’t win the PL if you ain’t in it. 
 

He also cleared debts, bought the stadium back, put money into charities in the city, and treated us superbly as a fan base. 
 

You would not have a single Leicester fan say a bad word about him before that helicopter crash. 
 

What people are doing here is trying to re write history because they are rightly pissed off at his creatin of a son. And that’s not right. 

[foxile5]

5 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

Exactly they can’t stop protesting if it’s reasonable, they can’t remove people without justification and if they did I’d welcome the court case, and take the little shit bag for all I could. 

I'm sorry but they absolutely can. 

 

It isn't society rules. It's the club's rules and they can (and have) ban for anything they choose. It's entirely up to them their rules and how they choose to enforce them. 

 

I'm not in support of this - I hate heavy handed stewarding with a passion - but just wanted to make you aware of how this faction of the club is running itself. 

[Corky]

The best thing for their brand is for us to be an entertaining, achieving Premier League side which makes the current acceptance of this dire situation even more confusing.

[foxile5]

https://assets.ctfassets.net/0wcpt07qzvlh/5H7lELzuRnqNPcp5FCOEIw/840f852b9c5bdecc840575c15c785880/2025-2026_-_Home_Match_Ticket_Terms_and_Conditions.pdf

 

Clause 1.3 and 1.5.

 

They're open enough to allow for any behaviour to be construed as removable and bannable. 

 

Again - I'm not saying don't do this or the club are right. I'm just letting you know, from experience, that the club will use any form of critical behaviour as a bannable excuse. They're that bad. 

 

They genuinely GENUINELY don't want our type of passionate supporter. I applaud you if you do this. 

[Ethan RL]

5 minutes ago, South Shire Fox said:

Yeah and its made absolutley no difference as they are still there. Stop giving them your money, best way at making a point

Yeah definitely, I myself have avoided giving them my money. I wouldn't say the West Ham thing has made absolutely no difference for them btw. It's attracted more numbers to that movement over the years as seen this season with the "No more BS Campaign". More and more of their fans have actively engaged with that. It's a marathon not a sprint.

 

I think our situations are slightly different. We're just on a downward trajectory ever since some of us have actively wanted KP out. West Ham though since they turned on their owners have had a conference league success embedded in there and a good run in the europa league. That imo helped their ownership paper over fundamental cracks massively and divert a lot of heat from people like David Sullivan. Whereas our ownership don't have that or any on pitch success CURRENTLY to use as an excuse and divert away any stick received from the fanbase. 

 

Of course some of us want KP out, but I personally think it'll take a while to get there which is why I think individual events like these would hold value because ultimately it does add up over time and continues the momentum which is crucial. It's not a change which will occur overnight. Again I think it's a marathon not a sprint, so I think it would be beneficial. It's all about building momentum and getting more people on board with it. That's our biggest issue atm. There is a huge divide. Need more people on board for the greater good of the club.

 

 

[Ethan RL]

21 minutes ago, foxile5 said:

This. 

 

The fan liaison officer is called Jim and they've been banning people quite willingly recently. 

We'll start with your initial suggestion of just eyeballing them then for 90 mins haha. See how much wiggle room we've got then gradually ramp it up until Jim warns us all.

 

 

[foxile5]

1 minute ago, Ethan RL said:

We'll start with your initial suggestion of just eyeballing them then for 90 mins haha. See how much wiggle room we've got then gradually ramp it up until Jim warns us all.

 

 

Mate I love the idea and I'm all for it. 

 

But just to contextualise it The Year Of The Fox was given a ticket ban for trying to get Brenda Nout on the big screen. 

 

What do you think Jim is going to do when twenty plus blokes are eyeballing his fuhrer? 

 

Go for it but just be aware of how shitty he and his team are at the minute .