Leicester Rule! Posted 6 January 2006 Posted 6 January 2006 I personally believe it is fake just to piss off the Russians!!
lesta fox Posted 6 January 2006 Posted 6 January 2006 I personally believe it is fake just to piss off the Russians!!
davieG Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 BBC Photo 'dispels moon landing conspiracy theory'
Len Finsbury Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 BBC Photo 'dispels moon landing conspiracy theory' Ha ha, love it! Photos supplied by the suspected conspirators prove it wasn't a hoax.
Jace Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Fake IMO, so many unanswered questions like: 1 in the shots taken when the American flag was erected it was flapping in the wind. How when the moon has no atmosphere? 2 How did they film the landing? Satelite cameras were not that advanced then. 3 why have we not been back there since? if you research those questions you will find they were actually answered
OzFox Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Just need some nice clear footage of WTC7 falling over, the Pentagon plane crash and Lee Harvey Oswald pulling the trigger and we can all relax
@mrtonycox Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 good post , the 3 quries id like explaining before i could make total judgement Wasn't there also a photo with everyone standing there and a reflection in one of their visors implying there were more people there than should have been also..?? Brain not awake yet.
Rincewind Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 A while back someone in a pub was asking the same questions so they must have seen the same programme. I am sure when organizing the fake set up the ones in charge neglected to take those things into consideration. The is a link saying delete my vote. I have not voted. Surprised as to how many voted fake. have considered it just to muck things up. Some people will find a conspiracy in anything The closest thing to a conspiracy that I believe is that far left and far right organizations are infutrated by people working undercover to discredit them by causing trouble at what are meant to be peaceful demonstrations/marches. I believe it is done worldwide in war and peacetime Just another form of spying.
@mrtonycox Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 On the bbc video it shows the buggy kicking up dust which falls back down... surely it should stay in the air?
Babylon Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Ha ha, love it! Photos supplied by the suspected conspirators prove it wasn't a hoax. And there is the crux of the matter, any evidence supplied whether it be physical, verbal or photographic is instantly dismissed as part of the cover up by those who don't want to believe. If you showed someone like El Empty two videos. The first containing a scientist who used lots of complex equations to come up with an answer "proving" a plane COULD NOT pull off a certain manoeuvre. The second a scientist using similarly complex equations proving a plane COULD feasibly pull off a certain manoeuvre, he would instantly dismiss the second video and believe the first.
ozleicester Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 the moon crashed into the twin towers FACT!
Rincewind Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Wasn't there also a photo with everyone standing there and a reflection in one of their visors implying there were more people there than should have been also..?? Brain not awake yet. Would they release a photo to the general public with all the conspiracy nutters about if they thought itt ould prove everything was an hoax? No doubt there is a perfectl logical explanation to it. Was a flash used? what exposure was used? what speed was used? Could be double images of some sort but I'm not an expert.
Charl91 Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 On the bbc video it shows the buggy kicking up dust which falls back down... surely it should stay in the air? Why? The moon has gravity, just less of it.
@mrtonycox Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Why? The moon has gravity, just less of it. Never been so i don't know..!!!
The Doctor Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Never been so i don't know..!!! What a stupid comment. It's simple knowledge the moon exerts gravitational pull.
BlueSi13 Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 Fake IMO, so many unanswered questions like: 1 in the shots taken when the American flag was erected it was flapping in the wind. How when the moon has no atmosphere? 2 How did they film the landing? Satelite cameras were not that advanced then. 3 why have we not been back there since? Watch Mythbusters moon conspiracy on youtube. Practically destroys every conspiracy theory argument going...including the apparently "flapping flag". But if that doesn't satisfy you...theres a million more shows on there that will. The reason the USA went to the moon was the beat the Soviets to it. If it was faked. Wouldn't the Soviet Union have known about it and destroyed the USA's credibility whilst the Apollo program was in full flight? It's a nonsense.
The Doctor Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 if you research those questions you will find they were actually answered Watch Mythbusters moon conspiracy on youtube. Practically destroys every conspiracy theory argument going...including the apparently "flapping flag". But if that doesn't satisfy you...theres a million more shows on there that will. The reason the USA went to the moon was the beat the Soviets to it. If it was faked. Wouldn't the Soviet Union have known about it and destroyed the USA's credibility whilst the Apollo program was in full flight? It's a nonsense. can I just point out the post you're replying to is nearly six years old.
Jace Posted 7 September 2011 Posted 7 September 2011 can I just point out the post you're replying to is nearly six years old. I retract my previous statement
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 8 September 2011 Posted 8 September 2011 It's true. I was there, when they arrived!
acooling08 Posted 8 September 2011 Posted 8 September 2011 Fake IMO, so many unanswered questions like: 1 in the shots taken when the American flag was erected it was flapping in the wind. How when the moon has no atmosphere? 2 How did they film the landing? Satelite cameras were not that advanced then. 3 why have we not been back there since? I know I'm 6 years late, but of course we have been back there since, many times, you goon! Also, Katy was originally called Katassi?
Rincewind Posted 8 September 2011 Posted 8 September 2011 Manned landings A total of twelve people have landed on the Moon. This was accomplished with two US pilot-astronauts flying a Lunar Module on each of six NASA missions across a 41-month time span starting on 21 July 1969 UTC, with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on Apollo 11 (with Armstrong being first to set foot on the surface), and ending on 14 December 1972 UTC with Gene Cernan and Jack Schmitt on Apollo 17 (with Cernan being the last to step off the lunar surface). All Apollo lunar missions had a third crew member who remained onboard the Command Module. The last three missions had a rover for increased mobility. Main article: Atmosphere of the Moon The Moon has an atmosphere so tenuous as to be nearly vacuum, with a total mass of less than 10 metric tons.[71] The surface pressure of this small mass is around 3 × 10−15 atm (0.3 nPa); it varies with the lunar day Thats two reasons for a conspiracy discredited. I think it can be safely concluded that the other one is rubbish too. Is it worth looking it up?
Yojoe36 Posted 8 September 2011 Posted 8 September 2011 I will have to say it was faked. There's a thin light going upwards above the "astronauts" head, a few times. Meaning there's a wire, so when they jump, it holds them up, making a illusion that there's low gravity. If you fast-forward the footage, it looks more obvious that there's something holding them up. But I haven't been to the moon, so I can't say what it looks like with low gravity. But still, FAKE
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.