chili_con_carne Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 we need to put some of the reserves in the first team players that actually want to play for leicester and want to win. not players like momo sylla who couldnt care less if leicester went down and just want money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Lass Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 Players such as... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chili_con_carne Posted 4 January 2006 Author Share Posted 4 January 2006 ashley chambers james weselowski alan sheehan o grady give them a chance at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 ashley chambers james weselowski alan sheehan o grady give them a chance at least. chambers isnt eligable, wesolowski isnt fit, sheehan will get another chance, and o'grady has only just come back from a loan spell and played on monday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SystonFox Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 spot on napalma although i think sheehans chance is overdue, he did good at the home game vs sheff weds. next featured for 10 mins vs bolton in the carling cup and is stupidly sent off vs crewe. i hope he doesnt have to wait as long to sit on the bench or even get in the 1st team. he is a natural left back and a good 1 from what ive seen. not seen chambo, weso or o grady except a penalty vs inter milan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 sheehan will probably comeback after the spurs game, though i'd play him as we have nothing to lose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 chambers isnt eligable, wesolowski isnt fit, sheehan will get another chance, and o'grady has only just come back from a loan spell and played on monday I think I've said this six times. Chambers is eligible unless you have alternative information to that supplied, I believe, by Steven some weeks ago. I understand the age ruling that would bar him has not come into effect yet although the club may be choosing to abide by the spirit of that ruling ahead of time (which I have certainly not heard). Certainly I can think of no reason why the club have not formally explained their position on this because it has been raised on several occasions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 I think it's the height of irony. A manager who takes us to the worst position in the club's history gets a massive vote of support and accepts it... he doesn't "drop" himself. Sheehan, still a youngster, makes a couple of mistakes in an otherwise decent performance (but still has a playing record in his matches which, if projected, would have left us well clear of the relegation zone) yet he has been pilloried mercilessly by the fans. If the fans truly got behind him and allowed him the time to find his feet, we wouldn't have a problem at left back. No-one has pilloried Nils or Maybury of Kisnorbo. Criticism yes, but not the vicious reaction that Sheehan suffered. People forget, we even scored two perfectly good goals against Crewe (despite one being disallowed) and when was the last time we did that?. We haven't scored one outfield goal for four games and have taken one point from 12 in his absence. When I think of Scottish contingent flops like Kisnorbo, Sylla, Hammill etc, not to mention Nils. I say give me Sheehan anytime. I said how strange it was that so many voted for his inclusion in the side but how few rushed to his defence after his error and misjudgements. If Levein had suffered such a fast condemnation he wouldn't even have started this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 I think I've said this six times. Chambers is eligible unless you have alternative information to that supplied, I believe, by Steven some weeks ago. I understand the age ruling that would bar him has not come into effect yet although the club may be choosing to abide by the spirit of that ruling ahead of time (which I have certainly not heard). Certainly I can think of no reason why the club have not formally explained their position on this because it has been raised on several occasions. Doens't matter any way I think he's 16 now. So he obviosuly he is eligible. I doubt he would be able to cut it 1st team though . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 Doens't matter any way I think he's 16 now. So he obviosuly he is elgible. I doubt he would be able to cut it 1st team. Not 16 til March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 Not 16 til March. Read somewhere he was born in 1989 obviously miss informed. Isn't he still nursing a injury of some sort as well.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 Read somewhere he was born in 1989 obviously miss informed. http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Match...4~35218,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bigman Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 Levi Porter is a quality winger. Watched him in the reserves and as impressed me every time. Heard we were loaning him to dundee, But not even had a chance in the 1st team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes_Wizard_Striker Posted 4 January 2006 Share Posted 4 January 2006 Levi Porter is a quality winger. Watched him in the reserves and as impressed me every time. Heard we were loaning him to dundee, But not even had a chance in the 1st team. Saw him against Inter Milan don't impress me to be fair it is against inter and he only have like 5 minutes of action Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrysalis Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 I would drop douglas and stick with the team used against norwich. The team selection needs to be settled down and stop this changing 3 or 4 players every game. Even if we lose 4-0 keep the same team and allow it to gel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultra Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 Not 16 til March. March 1st, actually. Information supplied by the lad himself to this very forum. He was actually on these boards last night. Wonder if he saw this thread? He may be useful later in the season as an impact player for the last 20 minutes or so of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M160RA Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 A team needs to be revived using the youngsters. It's a shame about the alleged ruling preventing Chambers from playing in League games. He might find it a little difficult to size up against players who are bigger and stronger than him, but Walcott's doing just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr potatohead Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 Chambers is not ready for the first team, it's too soon . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 Chambers is not ready for the first team, it's too soon . You're probably right. Just wondered why you're so sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 A team needs to be revived using the youngsters. It's a shame about the alleged ruling preventing Chambers from playing in League games. He might find it a little difficult to size up against players who are bigger and stronger than him, but Walcott's doing just fine. And he's told me he's fine to play in the league now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr potatohead Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 And he's told me he's fine to play in the league now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr potatohead Posted 5 January 2006 Share Posted 5 January 2006 I have seen him play several times , he has been largely inneffective . He looks quick and may with right service from midfield be able to expose teams with that pace . Unfortunately the way leicester plays means he ends up playing with his back to goal .Until he develops Physically, he from what I have seen cannot hold the ball up ( at first team or reserve level)and introduce other players to the game. At the moment in my opinion he is one dimensional and you need more than that at that level. I hope the coaching staff teach him to add other attributes to his game but I am not so sure. I think they are of a very poor standard. Let'snot ruin the lad by rushing him but lets also invest in him with some proper coaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 6 January 2006 Share Posted 6 January 2006 I have seen him play several times , he has been largely inneffective . He looks quick and may with right service from midfield be able to expose teams with that pace . Unfortunately the way leicester plays means he ends up playing with his back to goal .Until he develops Physically, he from what I have seen cannot hold the ball up ( at first team or reserve level)and introduce other players to the game. At the moment in my opinion he is one dimensional and you need more than that at that level. I hope the coaching staff teach him to add other attributes to his game but I am not so sure. I think they are of a very poor standard. Let'snot ruin the lad by rushing him but lets also invest in him with some proper coaching. Are you talking about Chambers? I agree he isn't ready yet, but he's certainly got the potential to be a quality player hence many top clubs watching him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 6 January 2006 Share Posted 6 January 2006 I have seen him play several times , he has been largely inneffective . He looks quick and may with right service from midfield be able to expose teams with that pace . Unfortunately the way leicester plays means he ends up playing with his back to goal .Until he develops Physically, he from what I have seen cannot hold the ball up ( at first team or reserve level)and introduce other players to the game. At the moment in my opinion he is one dimensional and you need more than that at that level. I hope the coaching staff teach him to add other attributes to his game but I am not so sure. I think they are of a very poor standard. Let'snot ruin the lad by rushing him but lets also invest in him with some proper coaching. That all sounds sensible enough. It's been a bit of a patchy season, what with his injury etc but he's still nabbed a few goals. Even on his return from injury in the Youth Cup, although rusty and lacking his usual sharpness he still seemed more directly dangerous and created more in-and-around-the box chances than our regular first team strikers. There have been times this season when, because of this, I'd have liked to see him on the bench rather than others who just don't seem to pose any great goal threat. I know he's young and slight. Ryan Smith looks the same sort of size/build to me. But the key thing about Chambers is impact. I keep stressing this in relation to other players. Too many, and Sylla is the prime example, just do not make enough things happen. When I've watched him, Chambers always makes things happen. He makes mistakes, hits the post, lobs over the bar but he always gets into dangerous places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.