Ultra Posted 23 August 2006 Posted 23 August 2006 It is not only Kenton's defensive play that has impressed me this season his distribution has been the best of any of our defenders. He is also fast. He has all the attributes to be effective as an attacking full back as well as a defensive one. I'm sure as the teams confidence increases Kenton will be able to get forward more frequently We saw glimpses of it in the early games. Hopefully we'll see more when he returns to the side. He may have a fight to retain his place now Stearman seems to have regained his form.
newms Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 We saw glimpses of it in the early games. Hopefully we'll see more when he returns to the side. He may have a fight to retain his place now Stearman seems to have regained his form. I cant see how Kenton can be dropped. RK will have to find a way to play both of them if Stearman deserves a place. Perhaps LB for Kenton but i'm generally against right footers playing LB. But i suppose its better than being no footed like our Premiership defender in waiting Mr Johansson
DannyLCFC1 Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 GK Henderson RB Stearman LB Kenton CB McCarthy CB Kisnorbo RW Low LW Porter CM Wesolowski CM Johnson ST Fryatt ST Hume Bench Logan, Mcauley, Hughes, Williams, O'Grady
Lester LXXIV Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 GK: Hendo LB: Nils/Sheehan RB: Kenton CB: McCarthy CB: Kisnorbo LW: Porter RW: Low CM: Weso/Hughes CM: Johnson ST: COG ST: Fryatt
Ric Flair Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 I want to see more of Logan, even though I don't think Henderson is that bad for a crap championship club like ourselves. Logan Stearman (Kenton needs to rest that troubled ankle) McCarthy Kisnorbo Not bothered all of them are crap Low Williams Wesolowski Porter Fryatt O'Grady Subs: Hume, Hughes, Johnson, Henderson, Maybury
Bert Posted 24 August 2006 Author Posted 24 August 2006 Controversial this may be, but surely our top goalscroing strikers should start?? (Yes, i know what team i put, i just wanted to stir things )
Ric Flair Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 Controversial this may be, but surely our top goalscroing strikers should start?? (Yes, i know what team i put, i just wanted to stir things ) Hume and O'Grady? I think all 3 should play.
TAFKA Castroneves Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 ----------------------------------------13---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------HENDERSON---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------4------------------5------------------------3-----------------11-------- ------KENTON---------McCARTHY-©---------KISNORBO--------TIATTO----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------16-----------------10-----------------------6-----------------27-------- --------LOW------------JOHNSON---------------HUGHES----------PORTER---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------12----------------------19--------------------------- --------------------------FRYATT----------------O'GRADY----------------------- Bench: 25. Logan, 17. Stearman, 20. Wesolowski, 8. Hume & 18. Hammond If Tiatto is fit it's worth trying him out at left back, we were all quick to write him off but against Ipswich he did have a good go and deserves to have another one. He possibly could be the solution to the left back problem as Nils (is okay) but lacking in some areas. O'Grady needs to start over Hammond up front.
Gamesmaster Posted 24 August 2006 Posted 24 August 2006 If Tiatto is fit it's worth trying him out at left back, we were all quick to write him off but against Ipswich he did have a good go and deserves to have another one. He possibly could be the solution to the left back problem as Nils (is okay) but lacking in some areas. O'Grady needs to start over Hammond up front. Tiatto played LW, Johanson has played well considering he's not a LB, and he's better than tiatto. Whatever johanson lacks at LB, is nothing in comparison to tiatto's attempt to last 90 mins, and putting the fear of allah in the oppositions faces
Manwell Pablo Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 ----------------------------------------13---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------HENDERSON---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------4------------------5------------------------3-----------------11-------- ------KENTON---------McCARTHY-©---------KISNORBO--------TIATTO----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------16-----------------10-----------------------6-----------------27-------- --------LOW------------JOHNSON---------------HUGHES----------PORTER---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------12----------------------19--------------------------- --------------------------FRYATT----------------O'GRADY----------------------- Bench: 25. Logan, 17. Stearman, 20. Wesolowski, 8. Hume & 18. Hammond If Tiatto is fit it's worth trying him out at left back, we were all quick to write him off but against Ipswich he did have a good go and deserves to have another one. He possibly could be the solution to the left back problem as Nils (is okay) but lacking in some areas. O'Grady needs to start over Hammond up front. I'd stick with Nils on this I have to say, the full back postions need to be thought about very carefully by RK as Mark Gower and Jamal Campbell-Ryce are a couple of very useful wingers at this level. I don't think Tiatto would be up to it defensively. Kenton's to stay at right back. O'Grady to start if he was really that impressive against Maccelsfield.
Shipman Out Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 ............................LOGAN STEARMAN....McCARTHY...KISNORBO.....SHEEHAN ......................WESOLOWSKI LOW...............................................PORTER ...........................HUME ...............FRYAT..............O'GRADY
bigneville Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 ............................LOGAN STEARMAN....McCARTHY...KISNORBO.....SHEEHAN ......................WESOLOWSKI LOW...............................................PORTER ...........................HUME ...............FRYAT..............O'GRADY So u'd make 6 changes from the team that played well at Coventry??
escape2victory Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 -------------------Henderson Kenton---McCarthy---Kisnorbo---Johansson Hughes---Williams---Wesolowski---Hume ------------Fryatt------O'Grady Subs: Maybury, Logan, Johnson, Low, Porter
Strokes Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 Logan, Stearman, McCarthy, Kisnorbo, Kenton, Low, Hughes, Wesolowski, Porter, Fryatt, O'Grady. Subs: Nils, Johnson, Williams, Dodds, Hume.
lookwhaticando Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 So u'd make 6 changes from the team that played well at Coventry?? Or 3 changes from the team that beat Macclesfield - just another way of looking at it.
shen Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 ----------------------Hendo------------------- Stearman----PaddyM----PaddyK----Kenton ---J Lo---------Will'o-----Weso--------Levi's ---------------Fryatt------O'Grady----------- Subs: Nissa, Logan, Johnson, Hume, Hughes
Thracian Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 Some decent teams getting "chosen" now! Much more heartening.
NFFC Chris Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 Good luck for tommorow I'm sure you won't need it though as I can see you winning 2-0.
London_Fox Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 COG on the bench apparently http://www.clubcall.com/index.jsp?storyID=288451
Mark Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 ----------------------Henderson------------------- Stearman----PaddyM----PaddyK----Kenton ---Low---------Williams-----Weso--------Levi ---------------Fryatt------O'Grady----------- Subs: Logan, Sheehan, Gradel, Hume, Hughes If Johansson is starting he really is in for a torrid time if Jamal Campbell-Ryce is playing right wing. Remember the Rotherham defeat? I'd definitely go with Kenton at left back.
Thracian Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 Where's the logic in that from Clubcall?. I could understand either of Hume or Fryatt being out but benching the one guy who can hold the ball up for support to arrive and who can win headers doesn't make sense. It's the balance thing again - and having people to do particular jobs, especially when our defence resorts to hoofing . Also it is O'Grady who seems best suited to making width when one of the wingers moves inside. Why pick two strikers with broadly the same attributes when we don't need to?.
Manwell Pablo Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 ----------------------Henderson------------------- Stearman----PaddyM----PaddyK----Kenton ---Low---------Williams-----Weso--------Levi ---------------Fryatt------O'Grady----------- Subs: Logan, Sheehan, Gradel, Hume, Hughes If Johansson is starting he really is in for a torrid time if Jamal Campbell-Ryce is playing right wing. Remember the Rotherham defeat? I'd definitely go with Kenton at left back. You never know with Gower and Jamal they can both play on either flank and normally swap numerous times during a game. Stearmen wont fair much better if his Championship form is anything to go by, Johanson lacks pace but he has got limited defensive qualties.
lcfc_jme Posted 25 August 2006 Posted 25 August 2006 Henderson Kenton McCarthy Kisnorbo Sheehan Low Hughes Johnson Porter Fryatt Hume Subs: Logan, Stearman, Weso, O'Grady, Nissa
bigneville Posted 26 August 2006 Posted 26 August 2006 Can i just make a point that..... No one got the correct starting line up Shows how much we know......
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.