MC Prussian Posted 11 December 2006 Posted 11 December 2006 My Vote goes to TPH, he's simply everywhere! *Turns around to see whether the aforementionned person is standing behind him, about to stab another unwanted element*
stez Posted 11 December 2006 Posted 11 December 2006 it looks like the paraguayan lad trumps all others
Daggers Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 It's got to be Disco Bob. I look nothing like that
Lemon Harpic Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 It's got to be Disco Bob. Ask him an awkward question and not only will he completely avoid giving you an answer, but he will attempt to slander you, and then shut the thread down immediately so you can't defend yourself or take him to task over his evasiveness. Perhaps not Dictator of the Year, but a shoe-in for Goebbels-style Propaganda Minister of the Year.
Daggers Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Well, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about, even if it is the biggest pile of bollocks.
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Well, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about, even if it is the biggest pile of bollocks. He called you a nazi, sue him.
Daggers Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 He called you a nazi, sue him. Well, with me and TPH both lumped in together with all of these marvelous dictators I think we should be planning to take over the country instead. Boy, will they regret it once we get hold of some real power to abuse.
Dr The Singh Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Not neccesarily seen as a dictator, but she implemanted Nazi type laws against Sikhs and systematically wiped out over 100,00 during her days, including the 1984 Sikh massacre!!!
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Not neccesarily seen as a dictator, but she implemanted Nazi type laws against Sikhs and systematically wiped out over 100,00 during her days, including the 1984 Sikh massacre!!! Really? she looks like the granny off the Koumas @ No.42
Lemon Harpic Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Well, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about, even if it is the biggest pile of bollocks. Trying to re-write history. You're really going all out for the Goebbels award, aren't you? Remember the 'What has been the best day of your life so far?' thread? I asked you if you thought that Manwell Pablo had implied that I supported paedophilia. This was an awkward question for you. Clearly, Manwell had made that implication and you knew it, but you didn't want to side with me, for obvious reasons. You had three options: 1) Be honest and admit that, yes, you thought he had implied that I supported paedophilia. 2) Lie. Just say that there was no such implication, and stick up for Manwell. 3) Avoid answering the question, attack me for asking it and then immediately close the thread to avoid rebuttal. You chose option 3). This is not bollocks. This is what happened.
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Trying to re-write history. You're really going all out for the Goebbels award, aren't you? Remember the 'What has been the best day of your life so far?' thread? I asked you if you thought that Manwell Pablo had implied that I supported paedophilia. This was an awkward question for you. Clearly, Manwell had made that implication and you knew it, but you didn't want to side with me, for obvious reasons. You had three options: 1) Be honest and admit that, yes, you thought he had implied that I supported paedophilia. 2) Lie. Just say that there was no such implication, and stick up for Manwell. 3) Avoid answering the question, attack me for asking it and then immediately close the thread to avoid rebuttal. You chose option 3). This is not bollocks. This is what happened. But I didn't imply that. You small minded fool.
Lemon Harpic Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 But I didn't imply that. You small minded fool. Personal abuse. No doubt DB will take appropriate action when he finds out... If you didn't imply that, then why didn't DB stick up for you? I asked him a straight question, and he refused to say that you didn't imply that I supported paedophilia. Interesting, don't you think?
Dr The Singh Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Really? she looks like the granny off the Koumas @ No.42 I don't know what Koumas's granny looks like but this granny and her forefathers come from a background of the hindu equivalent of nazi's and have persecuted the minorities in the name of creating a pure 'hindu' state, and they call India a democracy, what a joke!!!
Lemon Harpic Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 I don't know what Koumas's granny looks like She looks like Meera Syal dressed up in old woman clothes...
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Personal abuse. No doubt DB will take appropriate action when he finds out... If you didn't imply that, then why didn't DB stick up for you? I asked him a straight question, and he refused to say that you didn't imply that I supported paedophilia. Interesting, don't you think? No not at all, quite boring in fact, like a lot of the conversation today, roll on four o'clock. Since when has DB opinion been the be all and end all? As I said at the time, I said you should explain your views on the matter. I have a right to say that, it's applicable as I'm sure the people who I said you should explain your view to would not be happy about your dissolving of the police force that does it's best to prevent pedos walking the streets. As I asked at the time (funnily enough a straight question I asked you which you refused to give a straight answer to) how does that in any way say your in favour of paedophilia
Lemon Harpic Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 No not at all, quite boring in fact, like a lot of the conversation today, roll on four o'clock. Since when has DB opinion been the be all and end all? As I said at the time, I said you should explain your views on the matter. I have a right to say that, it's applicable as I'm sure the people who I said you should explain your view to would not be happy about your dissolving of the police force that does it's best to prevent pedos walking the streets. As I asked at the time (funnily enough a straight question I asked you which you refused to give a straight answer to) how does that in any way say your in favour of paedophilia I did answer the question, actually. It implies that I support paedophilia when you put it in context. You say that I should explain my support of the death of any British soldier in Iraq to the families of a soldier who has died in Iraq. In the same breath, you say that I should explain my "views" to the families of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman. This sets up the implication that I support paedophilia. Personally, I'd drop all this wide-eyed innocence crap. You knew what you were trying to imply when you brought the emotive issue of Holly and Jessica into it.
The People's Hero Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Wow, another mention for me. I seem to crop up a lot. Better to be talked about than not I suppose. Jealousy, I'll bet.
Daggers Posted 12 December 2006 Posted 12 December 2006 Remember the 'What has been the best day of your life so far?' thread? I remember that thread, thanks for asking. I stopped discussing the matter with you because you were verbally pissing on the memories of those who lost their lives. I had no intention to continue that farcical debate with you then...and not now either.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.