filbertway Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Never really go on TB, as people say this is a better layout, and (most) the posters here are alright.
Daggers Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I like TB. There's a load of people on there with a decent sense of humour who enjoy shooting the shit. I see no problem with that. Seems like the bulk of people bitching here are nowt more than kids who like pretty pictures. There's room on the internet for both. That EMC though - what a pile of shit that is!
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I like TB.There's a load of people on there with a decent sense of humour who enjoy shooting the shit. I see no problem with that. Seems like the bulk of people bitching here are nowt more than kids who like pretty pictures. There's room on the internet for both. That EMC though - what a pile of shit that is! I like that site, very well run, very Third Reichy.
Daggers Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I like that site, very well run, very Third Reichy. Apparently the moderators ensure that all the trains run on time
Master Fox Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I think TB is great. Ok you may argue it’s lay out isn’t a nice as FT but it makes up for that in other departments. There’s no censorship and very little bitching compared to FT. The posters and mods don’t take themselves as serious as they do on here. FT could learn a lot from TB. This place sucks!!!
Suffolk_fox Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Both this site and TB have their merits. The lay out on this site is good, and there are some personalities on here I like chatting with. TB doesn't crash as often, even if MM does sack the manager. Oh, and their 'chebs' equivalent allows nipples....
Stevosevic Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Both this site and TB have their merits.The lay out on this site is good, and there are some personalities on here I like chatting with. TB doesn't crash as often, even if MM does sack the manager. Oh, and their 'chebs' equivalent allows nipples.... how dare you! so do we....
Wezleylowski Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Both this site and TB have their merits.The lay out on this site is good, and there are some personalities on here I like chatting with. TB doesn't crash as often, even if MM does sack the manager. Oh, and their 'chebs' equivalent allows nipples.... oh how disgraceful? Nothing but neanderthals with there poor layouts and topic drifting and nipple flaunting chebs page, what would happen if another women was to accidentally stumble across that page and find herself silivating over the sight of another ladys breasts? Its just inconsideration.
Geo V Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Im happy with my whore of a girlfriend, Foxestalk who does everything I ask of her. There is no need to look elsewhere when you get what you want right here .
lildave3 Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Much prefer the layout on here than 'Talking Balls'. Who is that Joe guy that posts on TB he always seems to make up a load of rubbish. JoeB?
Guest Gist Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I was browsing through there earlier and noticed someone had made just over 20,000 posts
potter3 Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I swear I saw someone on there with over 50'000 He's called lazzer Seriously, what the fcuk, over 50'000 posts in less than 3 years.
Floating Fox Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I was browsing through there earlier and noticed someone had made just over 20,000 posts He is quite possibly the saddest fecker I've ever come accross for many reason. The main one being the fact that as soon as you post on there the wankqua will post back within 5 seconds with something totally irrelevant, usually slaging you off and if you prove a point him wrong then he just ignores the post. Complete Twat. Forum full of wankers as well. Foxello is on it for gods sake!
Guest Gist Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I swear I saw someone on there with over 50'000 He's called lazzer Seriously, what the fcuk, over 50'000 posts in less than 3 years. And I thought 20k was sad!
potter3 Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 And I thought 20k was sad! Careful, TPH will be there soon
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 I swear I saw someone on there with over 50'000 He's called lazzer Seriously, what the fcuk, over 50'000 posts in less than 3 years. 3 Years, 365 days in a year, 52 weeks in a year, 7 days in a week, 24 hours in a day. so 52,463, don't need to get it down to Post per days as I've just noticed TB does that for me. 37.12 / 24 = 1.54 a hour, for three years. Bearing in mind he sleeps for 8 hours a day (You'd hope) 37.12 / 16 = 2.32... a hour, every day for three years. putting it another way he posts three times the amount I do and has been doing it for twice as long. He's job must be even more boring than mine.
Guest Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Talking Balls has its good and bad points, just as this place does. And leave Lazzer out of this; I would rather have his job any day.
Manwell Pablo Posted 12 April 2007 Posted 12 April 2007 Talking Balls has its good and bad points, just as this place does.And leave Lazzer out of this; I would rather have his job any day. Ah, your not the only one.
Steven Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 3 Years, 365 days in a year, 52 weeks in a year, 7 days in a week, 24 hours in a day.so 52,463, don't need to get it down to Post per days as I've just noticed TB does that for me. 37.12 / 24 = 1.54 a hour, for three years. Bearing in mind he sleeps for 8 hours a day (You'd hope) 37.12 / 16 = 2.32... a hour, every day for three years. putting it another way he posts three times the amount I do and has been doing it for twice as long. He's job must be even more boring than mine. A for calculation but based on a false premise. Lazzer actually got given some 40,000 posts as a piss take. Lazzer was saying that post counts don't mean anything so Webbie gave him an extra 40,000 just to prove how little they mean.
drummindefender Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 Ah, your not the only one. i post on tb and i can confirm that Lazzers post count is more around the 13k mark-the moderator on tb made it ridiculously high when he reser them deleting a certain amount of posts made a long time ago, meaning certain posters such as lazzer had a number of posts removed-when lazzer complained asking for a real post count webbo made a fake one of 50k tb rules end of. WITH ICE
The People's Hero Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 i post on tb and i can confirm that Lazzers post count is more around the 13k mark-the moderator on tb made it ridiculously high when he reser them deleting a certain amount of posts made a long time ago, meaning certain posters such as lazzer had a number of posts removed-when lazzer complained asking for a real post count webbo made a fake one of 50ktb rules end of. WITH ICE With some of the posting on here, I'm beginning to think this TB might not be so bad. Talking Balls I mean. Not Tuberculosis, that's fairly plainly a bad thing.
drummindefender Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 With some of the posting on here, I'm beginning to think this TB might not be so bad.Talking Balls I mean. Not Tuberculosis, that's fairly plainly a bad thing. you won't be dissapointed!
Manwell Pablo Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 With some of the posting on here, I'm beginning to think this TB might not be so bad.Talking Balls I mean. Not Tuberculosis, that's fairly plainly a bad thing. I've thought that as well tbh.
Guest Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 i post on tb and i can confirm that Lazzers post count is more around the 13k mark-the moderator on tb made it ridiculously high when he reser them deleting a certain amount of posts made a long time ago, meaning certain posters such as lazzer had a number of posts removed-when lazzer complained asking for a real post count webbo made a fake one of 50ktb rules end of. WITH ICE Oi! Who let you in here?
Rincewind Posted 21 April 2007 Posted 21 April 2007 Pablo, did you count leap years in your calculations? I've nearly reached 2300 on here. Is that worthy of a praise you post?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.