Fez of Mahrez Posted 31 July 2007 Author Posted 31 July 2007 So anyway, getting back on topic, how do we think Louis Dodds is going to get on at Lincoln?
Ric Flair Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 So anyway, getting back on topic, how do we think Louis Dodds is going to get on at Lincoln? He'll be pissing out of his arse if Daggers has anything to do with it.
BartonFox Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 So anyway, getting back on topic, how do we think Louis Dodds is going to get on at Lincoln? Louis Dodds has gone to Lincoln, I thought he was meant for bigger things
Ric Flair Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Louis Dodds has gone to Lincoln, I thought he was meant for bigger things Well they do have a bigger hill in the town centre than ours.
BartonFox Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Well they do have a bigger hill in the town centre than ours. Ah, gotcha'
Ric Flair Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Ah, gotcha' I think their reserves play on a bigger pitch than ours as well. So the 'Goal-Smith' will improve his fitness levels, which will obviously lead to England recognition.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 31 July 2007 Author Posted 31 July 2007 Louis Dodds has gone to Lincoln, I thought he was meant for bigger things Maybe they have a bigger canteen in which he can get in some valuable training for his future career at Burger King.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 31 July 2007 Author Posted 31 July 2007 And if you're reading this Louis, I hope those words cut you deep while you're banging away at your beautiful yet vapid girlfriend or driving round in your nice motor or sitting on the bench at Accrington on a Tuesday night in November - and think of me sitting here in my dead-end job getting a lorryload of paragraphs from Thracian about how you are the best striker this club has never had.
Thracian Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Louis Dodds has gone to Lincoln, I thought he was meant for bigger things RicFlair's set him a notional target of 10 goals for his first season ... I'll definitely have some of that, barring serious injury.
filbertway Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 RicFlair's set him a notional target of 10 goals for his first season ... I'll definitely have some of that, barring serious injury. If he's as good a finisher as has been said, and he actually gets a fair amount of games 30-40, surely theres no reason he can't get 15-20 goals?
Mark Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 City: Nielsen, Maybury, Sheehan, Hellings, Magunda, Kenton, Newton, Hughes, Sappleton, Fryatt, Porter. Subs: Campbell, Logan, Gradel, McKay, Beswick, Chambers, Odhiambo, Rowe-Turner.
Thracian Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 If he's as good a finisher as has been said, and he actually gets a fair amount of games 30-40, surely theres no reason he can't get 15-20 goals? Sure, but I'm anticipating a programme of, say, 30 appearances in his first season at a new club. Anything over 10 at Leicester would warrant a prize Mars Bar and a mayoral reception so let's not expect too much, too soon, but seeing Ric put the figure forward I'm happy to back Doddsy to get there. With the birth of his first child (put your money on a son) due around September, 10 goals in his first season should be a nice way to celebrate.
Daggers Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Hughes Well...that speaks volumes about whether he's off or not
Stevosevic Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 City: Nielsen, Maybury, Sheehan, Hellings, Magunda, Kenton, Newton, Hughes, Sappleton, Fryatt, Porter.Subs: Campbell, Logan, Gradel, McKay, Beswick, Chambers, Odhiambo, Rowe-Turner. Weak team, only one outfield player in that eleven has a chance of playing the first game, a tiny chance at that.
Blue Bob Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Glad it is behind closed doors as the line up is second string at best. Hopefully they will let a few agents in!!!
Stevosevic Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Which Chambers is it? Anyone know? Dont know how you would.
lookwhaticando Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Which Chambers is it? Anyone know? Dont know how you would. My money's on young Ashley.
Simi Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Which Chambers is it? Anyone know? Dont know how you would. My money's on young Ashley. Correct. James Chambers trained last night.
Thracian Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 City: Nielsen, Maybury, Sheehan, Hellings, Magunda, Kenton, Newton, Hughes, Sappleton, Fryatt, Porter.Subs: Campbell, Logan, Gradel, McKay, Beswick, Chambers, Odhiambo, Rowe-Turner. They're certainly pushing Nielsen's case!. A few proper attackers on the bench too I see. In fact an old style five-man forward line in Gradel, McKay, Odhiambo, Chambers and Beswick. Between them they represented approximately 63 goals in 89 Academy games last season (plus odds in the reserves) with the first three mentioned claiming around 56. I can't see a goalless draw.
Thracian Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Weak team, only one outfield player in that eleven has a chance of playing the first game, a tiny chance at that. Broadly, but with the odd exception, that looks like the shadow side right now. But I'd say there were 10 outfielders who might feature in the first team at some time or another...Sheehan, Newton, Fryatt, Porter, Campbell, Gradel, McKay, Beswick, Ashley Chambers and Odhiambo. Of those the first five could feature fairly regularly as the squad stands now and assuming of course that they remain at the club.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 31 July 2007 Author Posted 31 July 2007 Must be weird for Fryatt going from being the golden boy to being included in all these reserve XIs in pre-season.
Thracian Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Which Chambers is it? Anyone know? Dont know how you would. Definitely Ashley.
Milky Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 Big night for Porter. Allen doesn't appear to be a big fan right now.
Thracian Posted 31 July 2007 Posted 31 July 2007 I can't believe Andy King is left out and Hughes is playing. (I'm docking 0.5 in total firstly because that's totally negative and backwards looking and because of the game being behind closed doors when a decision should have been taken days ago (total +16).
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.