Wherethefoxhat? Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Derby actually SPENT decent money last season & reaped the reward. Now there starting to SPEND again-Exactlly what are WE doing ?? I'm totally pi**ed off !!
Stevosevic Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Derby actually SPENT decent money last season & reaped the reward.Now there starting to SPEND again-Exactlly what are WE doing ?? I'm totally pi**ed off !! They've got more money than us probably.
Babylon Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Derby actually SPENT decent money last season & reaped the reward.Now there starting to SPEND again-Exactlly what are WE doing ?? I'm totally pi**ed off !! What you mean like the 1m on Howard... oh yeah we did the same Don't suppose being in the prem and getting 50m for the privilege has anything to do with it.
Master Fox Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Derby actually SPENT decent money last season & reaped the reward.Now there starting to SPEND again-Exactlly what are WE doing ?? I'm totally pi**ed off !! That’s a very interesting analysis
MikeyT Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Derby actually SPENT decent money last season & reaped the reward.Now there starting to SPEND again-Exactlly what are WE doing ?? I'm totally pi**ed off !! I totally understand where you are coming from. But spending alot of money doesnt automatically mean we wil get success. Look at Man City with their players like Petrov and Elano and a few others. They were unheard of players that cost them very little and look what an impact they have had on them. All i'm saying is, for all we know these two wingers we have got on loan could prove to be fantastic, and obviously hope they are. Again though i do understand where you are coming from, and i would like to see some proven players come here, but looking at our position in the league, players will probably see that as being a major hinder and we cant guarentee we will even be in this league come the end of the season.
Wherethefoxhat? Posted 8 January 2008 Author Posted 8 January 2008 What you mean like the 1m on Howard... oh yeah we did the same Don't suppose being in the prem and getting 50m for the privilege has anything to do with it. Read it all-they SPENT TO REACH the fecking prem Now they are buying Sav for £2 mill & he won't be the last. Who are you Babylon Mandarich ???
Babylon Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Read it all-they SPENT TO REACH the fecking premNow they are buying Sav for £2 mill & he won't be the last. Who are you Babylon Mandarich ??? Yes... they spent to reach the premiership, they spent £1m on howard exactly as we have just done. We signed Clemence for 750k and Dudley for 1.5m, have have also been bidding £1m + for Norris... on top of the cripplingly high wages we currently are paying out. We are not lacking in ambition, we are lacking in application.
Stevosevic Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Read it all-they SPENT TO REACH the fecking premNow they are buying Sav for £2 mill & he won't be the last. Who are you Babylon Mandarich ??? It's 'Mandaric' you fool £1million on Clemence £1.5million plus on DJ £1.5million on Howard plus all the wages spent on 14,15,16,17 new players, how many times do we have to explain it?
Wherethefoxhat? Posted 8 January 2008 Author Posted 8 January 2008 It's 'Mandaric' you fool £1million on Clemence £1.5million plus on DJ £1.5million on Howard plus all the wages spent on 14,15,16,17 new players, how many times do we have to explain it? ManderRICH was a JOKE--------& YOU call ME a fool ?? Moron-----if you'd got half a brain -you'd be dangerous !!
Wherethefoxhat? Posted 8 January 2008 Author Posted 8 January 2008 Idiot AlertIdiot Alert Who rattled your cage ??
Foxhateram Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 ManderRICH was a JOKE--------& YOU call ME a fool ??Moron-----if you'd got half a brain -you'd be dangerous !! hmmmmmmmmm a joke. tehehehe very funny give this guy a medel!!! if hes got half a brain then..................... wait hangon no need for that sort of response. We have spent money, weve just spent it on tripe. END OF! now what we need to do is Build! we have to many tripe players playing along side average ones, we need to bring in some stars who will make those average players raise their game. IH is building a team to save us for now! and i think hes doing a good job. Leave it be, be patiant, and watch as we rise away from the relegation zone. Its only Jan 8th anyway! there is plenty of time to spend.
Trumpet Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Who rattled your cage ?? Probably the clown who started this thread?
mancunianfox Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 ManderRICH was a JOKE--------& YOU call ME a fool ??Moron-----if you'd got half a brain -you'd be dangerous !! Derby didn't spend a huge amount last season to get into the Prem. I'm pretty sure that they didn't spend as much last season as we have this season when you factor in the multi-million pound transfer fees, signing on fees and large wages for out of contract players and the wages in players in on loan deals that 'Mandarich' has forked out for. You can blame Mandaric for a lot of our problems (and I certainly do) but he has not shown any reluctance to get his wallet out since he has been here.
Benji Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 I can't back this up with any proof from the top of my head but didn't Derby spend naff all and instead gave a load of youngsters a chance to shine?
Trumpet Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Also- Why are these threads coming up every now and then? Fair enough, after a bad result (every weekend) they will be about. But Tuesday? Why now? Do these people get the urge to post such shit about shit midweek?
Bluemoon Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Yes... they spent to reach the premiership, they spent £1m on howard exactly as we have just done. We signed Clemence for 750k and Dudley for 1.5m, have have also been bidding £1m + for Norris... on top of the cripplingly high wages we currently are paying out. We are not lacking in ambition, we are lacking in application. And team spirit
grth2004 Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 look what happened last time we spent loads of money the club nearly went down the crap hole
Lovejoy Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 Derby actually SPENT decent money last season & reaped the reward.Now there starting to SPEND again-Exactlly what are WE doing ?? I'm totally pi**ed off !! Go and support them then
Thracian Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 It's 'Mandaric' you fool £1million on Clemence £1.5million plus on DJ £1.5million on Howard plus all the wages spent on 14,15,16,17 new players, how many times do we have to explain it? If anything we'd probably have done better to spend less and be a bit more choosy on who it was spent on. I mentioned at the start of MM's "reign" how much better people can sometimes buy with a little money rather than a lot. I buy and sell every day and have noticed it dramatically. When flushed with money I take unnecessary risks and become a bit casual in checking things over. How that could apply to City! When I'm skint I become very selective, check everything methodically and invariably surprise myself with the quality of items I can get my hands on. Managers are dealers - they buy and sell footballers. They'd be careful too if they were spending their own money on fees and wages. But when it's someone else's money, and there's a lot of it, then they can become like pools winners, totally reckless. Would anyone seriously say we couldn't have bought better and probably considerably chaper than City over the summer?
Manwell Pablo Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 I can't back this up with any proof from the top of my head but didn't Derby spend naff all and instead gave a load of youngsters a chance to shine? They did buy/sign on quite a few players like Oakley, Howard, Fagan, Maken (I think), Leacock, Darren Moore, Pearson in fact he's right they did spend alot of money. So have we though. Differnce is we've been a bit silly.
Wherethefoxhat? Posted 8 January 2008 Author Posted 8 January 2008 If anything we'd probably have done better to spend less and be a bit more choosy on who it was spent on.I mentioned at the start of MM's "reign" how much better people can sometimes buy with a little money rather than a lot. I buy and sell every day and have noticed it dramatically. When flushed with money I take unnecessary risks and become a bit casual in checking things over. How that could apply to City! When I'm skint I become very selective, check everything methodically and invariably surprise myself with the quality of items I can get my hands on. Managers are dealers - they buy and sell footballers. They'd be careful too if they were spending their own money on fees and wages. But when it's someone else's money, and there's a lot of it, then they can become like pools winners, totally reckless. Would anyone seriously say we couldn't have bought better and probably considerably chaper than City over the summer? AT LAST--------------------------some sense !!!
Fez of Mahrez Posted 8 January 2008 Posted 8 January 2008 AT LAST--------------------------some sense !!! BUT DRBY SPENT LODZA MUNEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.