LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 So, a bloke is on trial for the rape and murder of a young girl. His DNA is found all over her. His explanation? http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1304109,00.html
cisono Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 So, a bloke is on trial for the rape and murder of a young girl. His DNA is found all over her. His explanation?http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1304109,00.html Is rape of a dead body (assuming she was already dead) not a crime anyway?!?!
Tommy G Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 What a sicko. Its truly astonishing what goes through peoples minds.
MikeyT Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 The guy should be locked up for life and have his bits blowtorched off!
Tommy G Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 The guy should be locked up for life and have his bits blowtorched off! Ouch
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 What I don't understand is, apart from the act itself, why does the guy think he is helping himself by coming out with that? Surely shagging the body of somebody who has clearly being murdered, so not reporting the crime and commitiing necrophilia, is not going to lessen his jail term. And certainly not going to make people feel his actions are any more acceptable. The quote that, I'm slightly ashamed to say, made me laugh, was the one where he says he was drunk and so took advantage of the situation. Now I've been drunk, and I've even on one occasion taken advantage of a fat bird. Very fat in fact. But a corpse? Thats a bit different. That to me is a bit beyond "taking advantage".
Daggers Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 Well, I guess since Gordon Ramsey cornered the market in swearing it was only a matter of time until some chef upped the ante. Mark Dixie ~ The murdering, lieing chef! It has a ring to it, I see a new prime time cooking show in the making.
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 Well, I guess since Gordon Ramsey cornered the market in swearing it was only a matter of time until some chef upped the ante.Mark Dixie ~ The murdering, lieing chef! It has a ring to it, I see a new prime time cooking show in the making. But he didn't murder her. Just took advantage, remember.....
hairy Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 I wonder if he was advised to say that by his brief?
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 Is rape of a dead body (assuming she was already dead) not a crime anyway?!?! It's not rape is it, its errrm, Necrophellia (sp) or some shit. Oh and leaving the scene of a crime, failing to report blah, being a total cock wipe etc etc, which knowing this country he'd probabley serve six weeks for, as opposed to the 5 or 6 years he will probabley get for rape and murder EDIT: Oh, and can I just say, she is fit.
James. Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 What I don't understand is, apart from the act itself, why does the guy think he is helping himself by coming out with that? Surely shagging the body of somebody who has clearly being murdered, so not reporting the crime and commitiing necrophilia, is not going to lessen his jail term. And certainly not going to make people feel his actions are any more acceptable. The quote that, I'm slightly ashamed to say, made me laugh, was the one where he says he was drunk and so took advantage of the situation. Now I've been drunk, and I've even on one occasion taken advantage of a fat bird. Very fat in fact. But a corpse? Thats a bit different. That to me is a bit beyond "taking advantage". Great post.
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 It's not rape is it, its errrm, Necrophellia (sp) or some shit. Oh and leaving the scene of a crime, failing to report blah, being a total cock wipe etc etc, which knowing this country he'd probabley serve six weeks for, as opposed to the 5 or 6 years he will probabley get for rape and murder EDIT: Oh, and can I just say, she is fit. Yeah shes definitley fit. Though perhaps not so much with the knife wounds and cold body. But, when you're drunk, your standard aren't always as high as they normally would be I guess.
Dr The Singh Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 It's not rape is it, its errrm, Necrophellia (sp) or some shit. Oh and leaving the scene of a crime, failing to report blah, being a total cock wipe etc etc, which knowing this country he'd probabley serve six weeks for, as opposed to the 5 or 6 years he will probabley get for rape and murder EDIT: Oh, and can I just say, she is fit. She was fit, Man Pabs, is there something you want to tell us.........................
Daggers Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 Really, if it is a lie, it's hardly crap - it has the makings of being a really good one unless they can prove he killed her. A crap lie would have been something like "I had nothing to do with those signings it was all Martin Allen!"
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 She was fit, Man Pabs, is there something you want to tell us......................... Yeah was I can't cook.
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 Really, if it is a lie, it's hardly crap - it has the makings of being a really good one unless they can prove he killed her.A crap lie would have been something like "I had nothing to do with those signings it was all Martin Allen!" Oh. But I believed that one.... That pesky Serb.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 Well what ever the case, it's sex without consent - ie rape. And just cos she's fit doesn't make any difference. It has no bearing whatsoever. Am I the only person who thinks it's a little sordid that pictures of her are all over the article? I mean, if she was still alive, they wouldn't be able to publish pictures of her, but cos she's dead, then thats ok?
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 Yeah shes definitley fit. Though perhaps not so much with the knife wounds and cold body. But, when you're drunk, your standard aren't always as high as they normally would be I guess. She might not be cold, depends how long she's been dead for.
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 Well what ever the case, it's sex without consent - ie rape.And just cos she's fit doesn't make any difference. It has no bearing whatsoever. Am I the only person who thinks it's a little sordid that pictures of her are all over the article? I mean, if she was still alive, they wouldn't be able to publish pictures of her, but cos she's dead, then thats ok? No it's not, you can't rape someone who is dead. It's like claiming you can rape a lamp post.
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 Well what ever the case, it's sex without consent - ie rape.And just cos she's fit doesn't make any difference. It has no bearing whatsoever. Am I the only person who thinks it's a little sordid that pictures of her are all over the article? I mean, if she was still alive, they wouldn't be able to publish pictures of her, but cos she's dead, then thats ok? But is it really rape? Okay, its without consent, but there are times I've shagged girls and they didn't expressely say yes. They weren't dead granted.
Daggers Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 I wonder which FT member is going to express outrage at the disgusting, base level of posting in this thread first?
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 I wonder which FT member is going to express outrage at the disgusting, base level of posting in this thread first? The ones who perhaps would have done the same themselves on a drunken stumble home. They know who they are.
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 February 2008 Posted 5 February 2008 I wonder which FT member is going to express outrage at the disgusting, base level of posting in this thread first? It's the murderes fault for coming out with such a ridiculous excuse. How do you take a thread like this seriously.
LeeCovFox Posted 5 February 2008 Author Posted 5 February 2008 I remember once taking my mum's cat to the vet as he was refusing to go out. The vet said he had been shagged. Not only that, but it must have been by more than one cat, as they would have had to have pinned him down by the tail. I blame the dirty gay raping tabbies from next door.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.