Tilley Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Sheehan has been amazin for leeds this year so is gud we've got him back.At least we've started gettin rid of sum of the players holdin us back. Now hopefully we can bring a couple in n keep our main players. We should be fine next year if we manage that I doubt he will sign, Ecspecially if Leeds go up, He will only sign if Leeds turn him down.
Flynny Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 I don't see Sheehan coming back whatever happens to Leeds, so this is all a bit pointless. We'll have no left-backs in a few weeks, and I can't think who we'd possibly sign either.
Tilley Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 I don't see Sheehan coming back whatever happens to Leeds, so this is all a bit pointless.We'll have no left-backs in a few weeks, and I can't think who we'd possibly sign either. Very true, Clapham has gone, Sheehan wont come back, Mattock smells the big time!
Flynny Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Very true,Clapham has gone, Sheehan wont come back, Mattock smells money! Harsh. As an England U21 he needs to be somewhere better than a League One team to get where he wants to be. I really doubt he'd be leaving if we'd not been relegated.
The People's Hero Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Sheehan has been amazin for leeds this year so is gud we've got him back. Are you basing that on anything OTHER than Thracian's posts?
Scow Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Are you basing that on anything OTHER than Thracian's posts? He is Thracian.
Sods Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Very true,Clapham has gone, Sheehan wont come back, Mattock smells money! I think if he stayed here he would receive more money in a few seasons time. Add ons if we get promoted. Only way him and Stearman may stay. To say Mattocks leaving for the money is ridiculous.
Tilley Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 I think if he stayed here he would receive more money in a few seasons time. Add ons if we get promoted. Only way him and Stearman may stay. To say Mattocks leaving for the money is ridiculous. Sorry, Misunderstood postings, I should have said, Mattock smells the big time, Better?
Darkzzz_ Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Mattock can smell the end of my bellend if he wants to leave this club!!!
Daggers Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 Mattock can smell the end of my bellend if he wants to leave this club!!! I want to leave this club.
Jonezy Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 I want to leave this club. Me too. Time for the players to stay, and the supporters to support whoever pay the most.
Darkzzz_ Posted 16 May 2008 Posted 16 May 2008 I want to leave this club. Ok some chutney is coming your way then!!
Daggers Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 I wonder if Elvis will find any kind of future within the game? I wouldn't employ someone with his *ahem* "problem" but there are some mad managers out there.
BigGibbo Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 I wonder if Elvis will find any kind of future within the game?I wouldn't employ someone with his *ahem* "problem" but there are some mad managers out there. I wouldn't be suprised if some one in league one took a gamble on him & he got 10+ goals next season!
breadandcheese Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 I wouldn't be suprised if some one in league one took a gamble on him & he got 10+ goals next season! All against us.
Thracian Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 Elvis I'm sickened by this. Just another dumb decision by a club that seems to have no idea how to get where it wants to go. The latest time consuming exercise over the management is just another example of the farce that has become our club and only reinforces my long held inner belief that MM should sack himself. Hammond should sit tight and hope we get a manager who appreciates what he could do to Division One defences. PS: There is more chance of Scoweh being appointed City manager than Sheehan signing for us if Leeds offer him an option.
The People's Hero Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 What we need at this club is some decent footballers. Showing those with no basic ability at all the door is a positive step in terms of sending out the message that shi tters are not wanted here. How anyone can be upset that this leech is on his way is beyond me. Slight 'ankle' injury and out for months and months with no explanation. Am I the only one capable of reading between the lines? (If only Elvis could stay between them, instead of being so drawn to them...) *snort*
Stevosevic Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 What we need at this club is some decent footballers.Showing those with no basic ability at all the door is a positive step in terms of sending out the message that shi tters are not wanted here. How anyone can be upset that this leech is on his way is beyond me. Slight 'ankle' injury and out for months and months with no explanation. Am I the only one capable of reading between the lines? (If only Elvis could stay between them, instead of being so drawn to them...)*snort* Is this true?
The People's Hero Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 Is this true? Maybe, allegedly. Almost definitely. And yes.
Thracian Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 What we need at this club is some decent footballers.Showing those with no basic ability at all the door is a positive step in terms of sending out the message that shi tters are not wanted here. How anyone can be upset that this leech is on his way is beyond me. Slight 'ankle' injury and out for months and months with no explanation. Am I the only one capable of reading between the lines? (If only Elvis could stay between them, instead of being so drawn to them...) *snort* Decent footballers are attracted to clubs who are going up rather than down and if you think, even at your most eccentric, that we are going to attract faster, more dangerous players than Elvis in Division One, then I can only hope you're right.
The People's Hero Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 Decent footballers are attracted to clubs who are going up rather than down and if you think, even at your most eccentric, that we are going to attract faster, more dangerous players than Elvis in Division One, then I can only hope you're right. Pace is useless without ability to do anything with it. It's like having a 14 inch penis, an impeccable thrusting action, charm, good looks and money to go with it but being impotent.
Thracian Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 Pace is useless without ability to do anything with it.It's like having a 14 inch penis, an impeccable thrusting action, charm, good looks and money to go with it but being impotent. I wouldn't know about that! My dad said it was dangerous to bonk with a folded cock!
Daggers Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 Thracian, assuming the rumours about him are true, would you still have him at a club you managed? I wouldn't.
Thracian Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 Thracian, assuming the rumours about him are true, would you still have him at a club you managed?I wouldn't. If I'd signed him then no question. Loyalty and support for my players would be a given. Whatever. I don't take much notice of rumours anyway. Speaking entirely hypothetically, what's worse? Smoking a few joints, being an obnoxious alcoholic, stealing, laying another guy's girl on the quiet, walking out on your wife and kids, being an intimidating control freak? I find setting standards for myself is hard enough let alone the thought of setting them for other people. And who can honestly claim they've never done something they regret, whether they were caught or not? Drugs concern me because of what they can turn people into, what horrific effects they can have and the control evil people can gain over people unfortunate or weak enough to get hooked. But, whatever their shortcomings, addicts need help, not decisions that are likely to make their problems worse. Besides should drug addicts be treated more harshly than alcoholics or any other addict? Seems to me that alcohol is the most pressing problem in football although alcohol/drugs/violence/intimidation/debacuhery or disrespect seem, so often, to be interconnected. When a manager I honestly didn't know much at all about my players' private lives nor did I want to know. Such few rules as I made concerned the game and training nights. What I did convey was certain attitudes and things I believed and hoped that messages would get across naturally. Certainly if anything a player did affected his matchday performance, be it related to drugs, alcohol, relationships, being tired because of a late night, I would be less than pleased, especially as a person not inclined to compromise and almost entirely deaf to excuse-makiing. However I was pretty careful about the players I signed and managers can go a long way to helping themselves by doing their homework. As for those players generally, so long as their private lives didn't affect me, the other players and what I was trying to achieve I'd leave them to set their own standards. Being fair they did that pretty well. Had that not been the case I'd have tried to help them. Whatever the problem was. Any discipline would be internal. Because rule number one was loyalty to the clan. I would always support my players in public and even if, eventually, there was no alternative, I would still refuse to say a word against them. Without that attitude you will achieve nothing.
BigGibbo Posted 19 May 2008 Posted 19 May 2008 If I'd signed him then no question. Loyalty and support for my players would be a given. Whatever. I don't take much notice of rumours anyway. What's worse? Smoking a few joints, being an obnoxious alcoholic, stealing, laying another guy's girl on the quiet, walking out or your wife and kids, being an intimidating control freak? I find setting standards for myself is hard enough let alone the thought of setting them for other people. And who can honestly claim they've never done something they regret, whether they were caught or not? Drugs concern me because of what they can turn people into, what horrific effects they can have and the control evil people can gain over people unfortunate or weak enough to get hooked. But, whatever their shortcomings, addicts need help, not decisions that are likely to make their problems worse. Besides should drug addicts be treated more harshly than alcoholics or any other addict? Seems to me that alcohol is the most pressing problem in football although alcohol/drugs/violence/intimidation/debacuhery or disrespect seem, so often, to be interconnected. When a manager I honestly didn't know much at all about my players' private lives nor did I want to know. Such few rules as I made concerned the game and training nights. What I did convey was certain attitudes and things I believed and hoped that messages would get across naturally. Certainly if anything a player did affected his matchday performance, be it related to drugs, alcohol, relationships, being tired because of a late night, I would be less than pleased, especially as person not inclined to compromise and almost entirely deaf to excuse-makiing. However I was pretty careful about the players I signed and managers can go a long way to helping themselves by doing their homework. As for those players generally, so long as their private lives didn't affect me, the other players and what I was trying to achieve I'd leave them to set their own standards. Being fair they did that pretty well. Had that not been the case I'd have tried to help them. Whatever the problem was. Any discipline would be internal. Because rule number one was loyalty to the clan. I would always support my players in public and even if, eventually, there was no alternative, I would still refuse to say a word against them. Without that attitude you will achieve nothing. We're not an addicts charity Thracian! but what he does outside the team doesn't matter if he's still good enough to get in the team, & anyone who thinks that most footballers are not off there tits on cocaine most saturday nights are quite wrong!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.