Nod.E Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Nice Bullard points. As regards fitness, I think premier league sides are bound to be a little fitter than that of our league, but only to a certain extent. These premiership players are not super human! Fitness is very much a personal thing and you can personally get just about as fit as you like. It is still a bunch of men in a football team who train all week and play all week. And infact, teams in league one can play a lot more games what with the Johnstone Paint Trophy and Play-offs.
Guest Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Nothing of note? He won alot of tackles that stopped promising attacks for Fulham through Bullard and Murphy. Weso kept them very, very quiet until the last 10 minutes. Glad to see somebody else thought he had a good game. I couldn't believe some of the harsh ratings of Weso on here after the match. He broke up loads of their plays and was always challenging for the ball. Alright there was something of the headless chicken/Tiatto about him at times and you could ask where he and kingy were for their last goal but I rated them both well
Joe. Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Sorry Davie, looks like I've taken your role for one game at least...
martyn Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Morrison rating is spot on, he had a nightmare first half....inexplicably misjudging every single aerial ball potentially putting us in trouble.
davieG Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Sorry Davie, looks like I've taken your role for one game at least... Only because I was disqualified from voting
Joe. Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Top voter for the 3rd time. Stop copying everybody else then...
Corky Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Top voter for the 3rd time. You seem to be far too nice Mikey, grow a harsher side
Bert Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Quick note - For the next game can everyone please give Fryatt a rating no higher than 6 please, as he didn't do very well last season, so he's not allowed a good rating no matter how well he does in any game this season.
Joe. Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Quick note - For the next game can everyone please give Fryatt a rating no higher than 6 please, as he didn't do very well last season, so he's not allowed a good rating no matter how well he does in any game this season. That's the spirit Bert!
Bert Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 That's the spirit Bert! Hhmmm. I really can't believe you're still letting Fryatt's last seasons performance have some hatred against him, 4 goals and dropped? What more can he do?
Joe. Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Hhmmm.I really can't believe you're still letting Fryatt's last seasons performance have some hatred against him, 4 goals and dropped? What more can he do? I just think Dickov could potentially do the same, possibly add more. I'd like to see him tried at least anyway...
Jimmy Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 I just think Dickov could potentially do the same, possibly add more. I'd like to see him tried at least anyway... why would you want to drop a striker who's scoring to "try" an older striker, basing it on Wednesday is daft because he only partnered Howard for like 25-30 mins
Joe. Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 why would you want to drop a striker who's scoring to "try" an older striker, basing it on Wednesday is daft because he only partnered Howard for like 25-30 mins Look, I've already discussed this in an earlier thread, it doesn't need going over again. I've already stated my reasons in other threads and I don't want to keep repeating myself and boring everybody else in the process.
Bert Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 I just think Dickov could potentially do the same, possibly add more. I'd like to see him tried at least anyway... He could, but why when a striker is in form? Don't say he isn't in form because he had a below average game against Fulham 4 goals in 3 and a half games to me is in form, also top scorer of League One.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Joe, you've ruined the whole season for everyone. Just go now, just go. It's all over.
Joe. Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Joe, you've ruined the whole season for everyone. Just go now, just go. It's all over. I'll miss you Matty baby.
clazkel Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Why does Howard always have to play, why not play Dickov and Fryatt, if it doesn't work bring Howard on, surely its worth a shot. Play ball on the deck, no long ball for Howard to knock on, i think it would suit our play better. Could be wrong but i think it could pay off!
Bryn Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Why does Howard always have to play, why not play Dickov and Fryatt, if it doesn't work bring Howard on, surely its worth a shot. Play ball on the deck, no long ball for Howard to knock on, i think it would suit our play better. Could be wrong but i think it could pay off! Well considering most fans seem to have approved of Howard's form and his linkup with Fryatt and both strikers (I think, at least one of them has) have come out and said they enjoy the partnership, and considering we're winning games, what's the point?
Bert Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Well considering most fans seem to have approved of Howard's form and his linkup with Fryatt and both strikers (I think, at least one of them has) have come out and said they enjoy the partnership, and considering we're winning games, what's the point? HE WAS SHIT LAST SEASON THOUGH, DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
clazkel Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Well considering most fans seem to have approved of Howard's form and his linkup with Fryatt and both strikers (I think, at least one of them has) have come out and said they enjoy the partnership, and considering we're winning games, what's the point? Yes, Howards form has improved and he links up well at times with Fryatt, but people say to drop Fryatt for Dickov, and i'm saying Howard should be dropped before Fryatt. I think we would be more creative and would play better attacking football if Fryatt and Dickov were up front. I could be wrong but i really think its worth a chance! But i understand why people say keep it how it is as we are winning and have been playing well.
Bryn Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 HE WAS SHIT LAST SEASON THOUGH, DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND? Shut up you moron, you're evidently not being sarcastic so all I'ma go ahead and point out the complete fooking obvious and say that Fryatt is a wondergod. [/craigadams]
Bert Posted 29 August 2008 Posted 29 August 2008 Shut up you moron, you're evidently not being sarcastic so all I'ma go ahead and point out the complete fooking obvious and say that Fryatt is a wondergod.[/craigadams] Is this a failed attempt at sarcasm?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.