Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Hackneyisblue

New goalie Steve Philips?

Recommended Posts

Posted

As back-up then fair enough, but theres no way he will be in for Weale, and who was this so called 'quality keeper' we're after mentioned on the phone in?

Posted
As back-up then fair enough, but theres no way he will be in for Weale, and who was this so called 'quality keeper' we're after mentioned on the phone in?

Fabien Barthez!

Posted

Seems to have a good game against us and most probably a good back up goalkeeper although cannot see why we need one if Logan is now staying.

If he was to come, we would have Weale from Bristol City and Steve Philips who has played for both Bristol Rovers and Bristol City.

Posted
conrad must be on his way....

Possibly but I doubt it after Pearson said he was improving in training so to suggest one of two things: He is prepared to give him a chance as a backup OR he is player naming in the press to alert other clubs to maybe come in for him?!

Posted
No we don't: Weale, Logan, Pentney. The club doesn't need to waste their time in the final week before the season chasing something we don't need.

Altogether kids 'Ohhh yes we dooooo!'

I don't think either of those are particularly rated, and what happens if Weale gets injured?

We broke about 6 goalies last season and had to keep getting another on loan.

Do you think that a good way of ensuring clean sheets by having a new goalie every month?

Defenders like to know what a goalie is likely to do.

Posted

If at some point we need a keeper then we'll get one on loan, I don't think we should be spending money bringing a new keeper when other areas are a priority currently.

I wouldn't want to have to use Logan this season though.

Posted

i have seen pentney once against Swindon where yeah he made a few good saves

the first time i seen him he had a knightmere against Quorn

Pearson obviously thinks Logan is Number2

on the Phillips theme he is a solid keeper from what i have seen of him over the years!

Posted
If at some point we need a keeper then we'll get one on loan, I don't think we should be spending money bringing a new keeper when other areas are a priority currently.

I wouldn't want to have to use Logan this season though.

This.

Surely Pentney would be decent back-up to Weale?

And this.

Posted

I somehow doubt that NFP is sitting there thinking to himself 'a goalie or a new striker which will it be'

If he doesn't think that the two in the stiffs are good enough then let's get another goalie in.

Where is the harm?

I think some of you have got a bit caught up on signing a striker and think that has to be done at the expense of strengthening the defense and midfield.

If NFP thinks ther are good defenders and midfielders currently available who will add depth to the squad then lets get them in.

Posted
I somehow doubt that NFP is sitting there thinking to himself 'a goalie or a new striker which will it be'

If he doesn't think that the two in the stiffs are good enough then let's get another goalie in.

Where is the harm?

I think some of you have got a bit caught up on signing a striker and think that has to be done at the expense of strengthening the defense and midfield.

If NFP thinks ther are good defenders and midfielders currently available who will add depth to the squad then lets get them in.

Where on earth have you got the idea that NP is not happy with the current keepers, just because you aren't happy with them doesn't mean he isn't. Pearson brought Weale in as number one, and he brought Logan back into the squad as number 2. We've got Pentney in reserve so why would we need another keeper? Of course you could get injuries but that is what the loan system is for.

Posted
Where on earth have you got the idea that NP is not happy with the current keepers, just because you aren't happy with them doesn't mean he isn't. Pearson brought Weale in as number one, and he brought Logan back into the squad as number 2. We've got Pentney in reserve so why would we need another keeper? Of course you could get injuries but that is what the loan system is for.

Why are you happy to get a loan player in if the goalie gets injured?

If that is the case will everyone please stop worrying about the lack of strikers, we'll just get a loan one in if Howard or Fryatt get injured.

And the reason I don't think they are good enough is because NFP appears to be looking for another one, in NFP I trust.

We'll just get one in on loan

:rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...