Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
acooling08

Disgrace

Recommended Posts

Posted

Link

Although obviously a rare case, headlines like these and the governments failure to act are what sparked groups such as the EDL, and votes for the BNP.

article-1339142-0C836085000005DC-535_634x758.jpg

I guess it's up to people to hold Cameron to account for his promises.

Posted

I know I'm being Mr Pedantic, but to be frank, I don't give a shit :D

Anyway, Cameron says 'that makes my team and me determined to put policies in place...'

Should it be, 'that makes my team and I determined to put policies in place...'

It's just a pet peeve of mine and had to get it off my chest!

Posted

I know I'm being Mr Pedantic, but to be frank, I don't give a shit :D

Anyway, Cameron says 'that makes my team and me determined to put policies in place...'

Should it be, 'that makes my team and I determined to put policies in place...'

It's just a pet peeve of mine and had to get it off my chest!

what?

you don't give a shit a young girl died,perhaps if it were your own you would give a shit ,moron !

Posted

what?

you don't give a shit a young girl died,perhaps if it were your own you would give a shit ,moron !

Re-read it.

He doesn't give a shit about being called a pedant, not that a girl died.

Posted

what?

you don't give a shit a young girl died,perhaps if it were your own you would give a shit ,moron !

Did I say I didn't give a shit a young girl died?

No. Re-read what I said and I made no remark like that.

Posted

my bad,i apologise,didn't read your comment properly and just went on one :ph34r:

Posted

Should it be, 'that makes my team and I determined to put policies in place...'

No, it shouldn't. Sorry, but you are wrong,

The accusative (or object case) for the sentence demands a "me" not an "I". If you take out the concept of "my team" you can't say "that makes I determined to...".

Posted

No, it shouldn't. Sorry, but you are wrong,

The accusative (or object case) for the sentence demands a "me" not an "I". If you take out the concept of "my team" you can't say "that makes I determined to...".

I fvcking love you.

Posted

I fvcking love you.

not wanting to be pedantic , but shouldn't that be

"I love fvcking you "

anyway ;

I'm not totally against the human rights bill , but would welcome a British bill of rights too.

The only problem i have is the massive scope for interpretation of such bills .

For instance the judges claim that he cannot be deported because he has "a right to a family life" and quite so .

But if someone is a proven criminal, then locking them away in a prison cell is taking away that right , just as much as deportation , so there can never be a total right to family life .

Surely all that needs to happen, is to place amendments on the bill to over ride one's rights if the person acts illegally , thereby allowing the state to take away rights if they conflict with normal procedure

( eg I'm fairly sure that if the state were at war and conscription needed to apply , the human rights act would cease to act for anyone being sent away to fight and die in a foreign field )

Posted

I love reading comments in the Daily Mail comment sections. It gives me an intellectual superiority complex.

Posted

my bad,i apologise,didn't read your comment properly and just went on one :ph34r:

Amazing how someone can go off on one and still get 5 +1s :whistle:

And despite the obvious tragedy involved, would anyone care to dredge through innumerable stories where white English people have done things just as terrible and consistantly gotten away with it due to lenient sentencing/loopholes?

Tragic? Yes. Cause for racial outrage? No.

Only an idiot would would use this as fuel for the BNP/EDL bonfire and there's no idiots in the BNP or EDL - are there? :whistle:

Posted

DailyMailTwit

- today, we've continued our daily theme of the last decade by publishing several more heavily biased race-based stories with the aim of promoting disharmony and fracture within society. We hope to have stirred enough outrage amongst our readers for it to manifest itself into street level violence, which we can then photograph and plaster all over our front page, in doing so drawing in more readers, who we can then aim to manipulate into similar dramatic actions with the use of further heavily biased race-based stories. We hope the cycle continues until we are rich enough to buy our own private island and can leave heathrow just before it gets blown to pieces by one of our little groups of pawns. We will then happily watch the civil war destroy the country from the comfort of our beach hut.

Posted

Yet again ignorance reigns supreme.

In the Immigration system, when considering Art. 8 Human Rights arguments, it isn't just the rights of the applicant/appellant; the rights of the family are also taken into consideration, in this case, the bloke's wife and children. For the record, they are British citizens, so can't be deported.

Before spouting racist diatribe, at least have the decency to find out what matters are taken into consideration before commenting.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...