Bob Weasel Fox Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Cracking... open the champers when we sign a forward at last?
Jollie Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 4th official just tweeted we're in open discussion about the structure of the deal. Essentially this means we have agreement over the total figure (putting aside add ons) and are haggling over the payment plan. Despite what many think, transfer fees are often paid on installments rather than lump sum - helps with affordability and means fres can be spread accross more than 1 set of yearly accounts improving the financial look of the club. Presumably Bristol are pushing for a front loaded deal and we're looking to stage payments over a longet period. This is completely different and seperate to add ons. hopefully not long (crosses fingers) Fromage Fres?
Guest shearfox Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Why is this the most complex transfer ever? Bristol have just tried to hold on to him for as long as possible but may be starting to realise he wants to play for a bigger club...
Guest ttfn Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Despite what many think, transfer fees are often paid on installments rather than lump sum - helps with affordability and means fres can be spread accross more than 1 set of yearly accounts improving the financial look of the club. How we pay for it has zero effect on the club's accounts. Once the total amount (pre-add ons) is agreed the only thing which changes the effect on the club's accounts is the length of Maynard's contract.
Jollie Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Fourth Official I'm not saying the Maynard deal isn't happening, its very very close to finally coming to a conclusion, not quite accepted yet though, soon
topharry123 Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Fourth Official I'm not saying the Maynard deal isn't happening, its very very close to finally coming to a conclusion, not quite accepted yet though, soon Is there an echo in here Is there an echo in here Is there an echo in here
Howard9 Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Is there an echo in here Is there an echo in here Is there an echo in here
Northants Fox 3 Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Is there an echo in here Is there an echo in here Is there an echo in here ECHO ECHO ECHO echo echo echo echo
Salieri Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 Going off topic is all well and good in any thread as long as one vital ingredient is always present. Humour.
Raw Dykes Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 How we pay for it has zero effect on the club's accounts. Once the total amount (pre-add ons) is agreed the only thing which changes the effect on the club's accounts is the length of Maynard's contract. I'm nitpicking, but you get more interest if you pay fully or in part by installments, rather than all at once. You could pay the full £6.5m up front and go without the interest that money would have generated in interest, or pay, say, £200k a month for a few years and still have millions in the bank, and the interest it brings in on top of it. I expect a lot of transfers are part up front fee, and part installments as a compromise between the buyer and seller.
Northants Fox 3 Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 I just wish something would happen :frantics: Cause it's making me :ill:
Guest shearfox Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 I'm nitpicking, but you get more interest if you pay fully or in part by installments, rather than all at once. You could pay the full £6.5m up front and go without the interest that money would have generated in interest, or pay, say, £200k a month for a few years and still have millions in the bank, and the interest it brings in on top of it. I expect a lot of transfers are part up front fee, and part installments as a compromise between the buyer and seller. Yep even if you play FM you know not to pay the fee in full....
Guest ttfn Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 I'm nitpicking, but you get more interest if you pay fully or in part by installments, rather than all at once. You could pay the full £6.5m up front and go without the interest that money would have generated in interest, or pay, say, £200k a month for a few years and still have millions in the bank, and the interest it brings in on top of it. Indeed you are nitpicking. 99% sure this isn't the club's money so the interest wouldn't show in the accounts anyway. You're right though, from KP's cash flow perspective spreading the fee makes sense. But, and I must emphasise this, the cash structure of the deal does not effect the accounts. Once the guaranteed fee is agreed, the only thing which determines what is shown in the accounts is the length of contract.
Jobyfox Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 i really hope that :sge: can sort this out soon so NM can become a :fox: This is fast becoming the most protracted transfer saga in LCFC's history and frankly everybody is starting to So NM just goodbye to BCFC and give them the on a new contract so we can all finally you. Then people might be able to finally and stop using silly emoticons to illustrate their points, which is frankly beginning to make me rather
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 I just wish something would happen :frantics: Cause it's making me :ill: dont worry, have patience (i know i feel exactly the same about this never ending story!!!)
AoWW Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 I told davieG he needed to put that jumper in the wash!
Northants Fox 3 Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 dont worry, have patience (i know i feel exactly the same about this never ending story!!!) :clap: I told davieG he needed to put that jumper in the wash!
Guest Posted 26 August 2011 Posted 26 August 2011 How we pay for it has zero effect on the club's accounts. Once the total amount (pre-add ons) is agreed the only thing which changes the effect on the club's accounts is the length of Maynard's contract. I'm no accountant but surely it affects the amount having actually left the clubs accounts during the year? although the remaining sum will still be held as a liability the increased funds being held affects interest payments and the current yrars budget surely? I accept I may be wrong. fairly moot point though to be fair!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.