zubi Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Can we really afford it? Even though the Thais are loaded would they spend £12m on two players?
Master Fox Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 9 FOOKING MIL?! Yep. You know it. Would love to blow 9 mill on Jelavic. Would be quite wonderful.
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Can we really afford it? Even though the Thais are loaded would they spend £12m on two players? If it means going up then yes
Ozwin Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 £9M?! That's mental. £6.5M is mental. This whole summer has been ****ing mental.
adam1 Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Can we really afford it? Even though the Thais are loaded would they spend £12m on two players? We win games. Boost profile. Get promoted. Boost profile. Get promoted. £££££££££
Libertine Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Sounds like rubbish tbh. Hope so anyway. Don't know a lot about him but I'd rather we just got another striker in on loan. There'll be some decent options for sure.
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 18 goals in 28 games, why not we needed more than one striker so hope we get him
LJS Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 According to a Rangers fan on another forum the only time he has heard of IbroxUnofficial in the past is when he claimed that David Trezeguet would be signing for Rangers. So he is probably full of shit.
FoxesFan123 Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Seriously, we don't need him. Nugents looked good, we've just signed a fantastic played in Beckford, and we still have Vassell and Gallagher AND the very impressive Schlupp.
Austin Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Hope this deals dead and we just get someone in on loan when the 25 man squads are announced!
monsell fox Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 I think that this maybe a little bit too late to get done anyhow i read somewhere earlier that hes on international duty with croatia so IF this was to happen , how would the medical be done ?
ithuriel Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Seriously, we don't need him. Nugents looked good, we've just signed a fantastic played in Beckford, and we still have Vassell and Gallagher AND the very impressive Schlupp. I disagree since we are after an automatic spot, gally is not an out n out striker and vassell is no longer a youngster, schlupp this season is fine as back up. We have seen in the few games so far Nugent needs support and getting in one extra striker means we better hope for no long term injuries. This being Leicester you just know we will lose one for some period of time at some point
LJS Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Deadline day signings are not subject to medicals. You get the player signed on and take the risk that they will pass the medical afterwards if need be. That's not to say that clubs don't put players through medicals, just that it isn't necessary for the completion of the transfer.
Libertine Dream Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Seriously, we don't need him. Nugents looked good, we've just signed a fantastic played in Beckford, and we still have Vassell and Gallagher AND the very impressive Schlupp. But our squad would be really strong with him. Vassell and Gallagher just aren't players to play up front in the centre. Schlupp is still too young to be more than a bit part, which leaves Nugent and Beckford as our only 2 options imo.
Forfoxsake1 Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Any player coming in has to be better than what we've already got, I'm my opinion he is, saying we don't need him is true if were satisfied with a mid table position, one player in won't make much difference (beckford) west ham looked strong before today but still made a good couple of aquisitions to strengthen there position as title challengers,
monsell fox Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Deadline day signings are not subject to medicals. You get the player signed on and take the risk that they will pass the medical afterwards if need be. That's not to say that clubs don't put players through medicals, just that it isn't necessary for the completion of the transfer. Cheers for clearing that up mate !
MGLCFC Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 It only takes 5 minutes to fax info. through - I would assume there is a representative from Leicester in Croatia. Medical not necessary.
scarboro flyer Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Complete waste of money , the league is sub standarad and he has not pulled up any roses in a crap league Complete waste of money , the league is sub standarad and he has not pulled up any roses in a crap league
Nick Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 Complete waste of money , the league is sub standarad and he has not pulled up any roses in a crap league Complete waste of money , the league is sub standarad and he has not pulled up any roses in a crap league We all doubt this will happen - but this is a real comedy first post, worthy of a real troll. Welcome and congratulations.
Guest shearfox Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 SSN: Just said Rangers look like they will hold on to their star striker
jonthefox Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 SSN: Just said Rangers look like they will hold on to their star striker nah. 45 minutes left yet. Plenty of time.
wayne76 Posted 31 August 2011 Posted 31 August 2011 this is sky sports making good tv wont happen fact!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.