Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Lcfclee

Is Vardy good enough to be a main striker ?

Recommended Posts

Posted

Countless efforts but 0 goals I think he is decent but only as a secondary option

Countless efforts, 0 goals- how is he decent?

Guest parky0607
Posted

oh seriously ! All our attacking options bar king were off form today.

Are you questioning Beckfords or Nugents ability?

I REALLY despise threads specifically aimed at a certain player, I think its well out of order and not very constructive, considering they do probably read this forum.

Posted

He has already missed 2 headers that I probably could have scored.

He works very hard but from what I've seen, Nugent is a better finisher.

Nugent-Beckford or Nugent-Vardy for me.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Yes he is!

Fook off and give him more of a chance!

We're two games in!

Posted

I agree but why stick him in straight the way we should introduce him gradually as surely the more he fires blanks the more his confidence is gonna take a hit

Posted

I'm actually shocked (doesn't happen very often on FT) at the criticism of Vardy already! How can we possibly conclude that he isn't good enough after 3 competitive games? He's played well in these games and his work rate is second to none. Give the guy a chance, I know this might be a new concept for some

Guest parky0607
Posted

Countless efforts, 0 goals- how is he decent?

Oh my days, he hasnt scored in 2 games, call the police quick!

:frantics: :frantics: :frantics:

Posted

Oh my days, he hasnt scored in 2 games, call the police quick!

:frantics: :frantics: :frantics:

The funniest thing is he thinks the number of shots a player can have in a couple of games is countless.

Posted

Oh my days, he hasnt scored in 2 games, call the police quick!

:frantics: :frantics: :frantics:

I didn't understand the comment.

He said he's decent without saying why.

I don't have a problem with him, just didn't get the comment.

Posted

I will judge that once iv'e seen a replay of his header.

If it really was an absolute shocker, then i would immediately go with Nugent and Becks next game

Posted

Anyone saying Nugent-Beckford has forgot how total shit it was last season... 2 total strangers barely acknowleding each other, never-mind making passes, slotting each other through or anything else that hinted they could become a partnership

Vardy is doing great from what I've seen, many people's man of the match on his home debut & unlucky tonight... but still in there at the right place at the right time to get chances, certainly more than his partner did in the first half

He'll be great...

I think we might lack Nuge's workrate & Nuge-Vardy is worth a start, although I'm wondering where Fructas is as any of the Becks/Nuge/Vardy could play with him

Posted

I will judge that once iv'e seen a replay of his header.

So you can judge whether he's good enough based on one missed chance?

Guest parky0607
Posted

I didn't understand the comment.

He said he's decent without saying why.

I don't have a problem with him, just didn't get the comment.

Fair enough, but this thread is still ridiculous

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...