Zingari Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Most post was tongue in cheek. Yeah I'm a huge fan of the divide by 2 then +7 rule, I think we should live by it. So a 40 year old, the youngest you can go is 27. Fair. 30 years old - 22 years old 18 year old - 16 years old. 16 year old - 15 years old You can't go wrong with it. “I’m going out now mum†“Have a good time son, have you got everything†“Yes, mum, I’ll just check though. Wallet, watch, comb, phone, breath fresheners, condoms…………. oh shit I’ve forgotten the pocket calculatorâ€
indierich06 Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Kindly bear in mind I don't have an hour to write an essay! Man is not designed to lie with man and there is a reason for that. Whatever your religious convictions it is clearly against the law of nature. Venereal diseases seem more prevalent amongst the gay population which could be construed as a warning against their activities. Encouraging something which carries such risks is clearly immoral hence my suggestion the age of consent be raised to 25 to protect youngsters. If fully developed adults decide to take such risks that is their choice. Youngsters starting to find themselves in the adult world should be protected. The very fact that they are physically able to have sex and enjoy it runs completely counter to what you're saying there. If they were not designed to be able to ****, then they wouldn't, would they?
Guest MattP Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 “I’m going out now mum†“Have a good time son, have you got everything†“Yes, mum, I’ll just check though. Wallet, watch, comb, phone, breath fresheners, condoms…………. oh shit I’ve forgotten the pocket calculator†Educational as well as sensible. And I have no idea what my mother would have said had I replied with 'condoms' to that question.
Leicester Piggott Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 The very fact that they are physically able to have sex and enjoy it runs completely counter to what you're saying there. If they were not designed to be able to ****, then they wouldn't, would they? I could nob a hedgehog, a cat, a hippo, a dead person, a child or an apple pie, doesn't make it right?
FurtiveFox Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Yeah, apologies for that, would only have asked for a brief summation. As for what you've written here, I'm sorry but I must disagree with your assertion that it is against nature. Sex is not just about procreation, it can be recreational too. And I believe that the higher incidence of VD amongst the gay population comes from lax use of protection rather than any other reason. It makes sense to use a condom regardless of whether you're having vaginal or anal sex IMO. To nullify that risk that you talk about, protection use should be further encouraged. I honestly don't think the act of sex between two consenting adults is immoral, regardless of what gender they are. The anal passge has much thinner skin than the vaginal meaning it is far more likely to rupture and therefore greater risk of disease. To put it crudely the backside is not designed for anal sex but rather for shitting. This is how nature has designed us. We should accept that and rejoice in our relationships with those of the opposite sex which is what we are designed for.
leicsmac Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 “I’m going out now mum†“Have a good time son, have you got everything†“Yes, mum, I’ll just check though. Wallet, watch, comb, phone, breath fresheners, condoms…………. oh shit I’ve forgotten the pocket calculator†People who can't do that level of mental arithmetic shouldn't be allowed to have sex and risk procreation.
FurtiveFox Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 I could nob a hedgehog, a cat, a hippo, a dead person, a child or an apple pie, doesn't make it right? Exactly although as long as the apple pie isn't piping hot that one could be an exception. I'm also sure some on here have had hippos in their time.
Guest MattP Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Exactly although as long as the apple pie isn't piping hot that one could be an exception. I'm also sure some on here have had hippos in their time. Pretty sure a few who post on here have had everything on there.
indierich06 Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 I could nob a hedgehog, a cat, a hippo, a dead person, a child or an apple pie, doesn't make it right? None of those are consenting adults. If two adults are able and are consenting, then what's the problem? None of this 'man was not meant to lie with man' nonsense.
leicsmac Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 The anal passge has much thinner skin than the vaginal meaning it is far more likely to rupture and therefore greater risk of disease. To put it crudely the backside is not designed for anal sex but rather for shitting. This is how nature has designed us. We should accept that and rejoice in our relationships with those of the opposite sex which is what we are designed for. That's a more reasonable medical reason for shying away from anal sex. However that alone doesn't preclude homosexual relationships or sex. Sorry, but I strongly believe in freedom of choice for consenting adults in this case. Obviously you take a different view, believing in a particular systematic approach, and fair enough.
MC Prussian Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 I could nob a hedgehog, a cat, a hippo, a dead person, a child or an apple pie, doesn't make it right? Well, I guess you could. The main question would be: Can you fit it in?
Bellend Sebastian Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Do you remember that bloke from Beaumont Leys that was had up for having sex with dogs? It was a funny old one, because he was letting the dogs shag him. He did time for that, and I thought it was a bit harsh because it was in the privacy of his own home, and although I'm no expert I cannot imagine it's easy to get a dog to shag you if it doesn't want to
The Blur Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 The anal passge has much thinner skin than the vaginal meaning it is far more likely to rupture and therefore greater risk of disease. To put it crudely the backside is not designed for anal sex but rather for shitting. This is how nature has designed us. We should accept that and rejoice in our relationships with those of the opposite sex which is what we are designed for. On a light note for this thread, I was about to have my lunch before I read this. Needless to say, my lunch plans is now shelved!
MC Prussian Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 The anal passge has much thinner skin than the vaginal meaning it is far more likely to rupture and therefore greater risk of disease. To put it crudely the backside is not designed for anal sex but rather for shitting. This is how nature has designed us. We should accept that and rejoice in our relationships with those of the opposite sex which is what we are designed for. Are you an expert in this matter? Care to penetrate us further?
I am Rod Hull Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Used to work with a bloke who "allegedly" got caught shagging a chicken..... We called him The Colonel.
Zingari Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 People who can't do that level of mental arithmetic shouldn't be allowed to have sex and risk procreation. I don't think you can be selective in which topics people need to attain certain standards before having sex . Should they know stuff like the chemical symbol for sodium , the location of the hyoid , the capital of Nigeria, and the date of the battle of Crecy before they are allowed to play hide the sausage ?
Necro Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 To the person who said dead people cannot give consent, I happen to know that this isn't true. Dead people can use their auras to either repel you or attract you like a magnet. On the topic of gay marriage, I think it's a step in the right direction and long overdue. I sincerely hope that the trend keeps going and more alternative sexualities become socially acceptable and legally recognised.
Zingari Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 Used to work with a bloke who "allegedly" got caught shagging a chicken..... We called him The Colonel. that sounds fowl ? are you sure he wasn't just caught stuffing a chicken and someone got the wrong end of the stick?
breadandcheese Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 I can't work out whether some of the views in this are genuine or just trolling. I hope the latter because the former is genuinely sad.
21st Century Fox Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 To the person who said dead people cannot give consent, I happen to know that this isn't true. Dead people can use their auras to either repel you or attract you like a magnet. On the topic of gay marriage, I think it's a step in the right direction and long overdue. I sincerely hope that the trend keeps going and more alternative sexualities become socially acceptable and legally recognised. That just gave me crotch rigor mortis!
I am Rod Hull Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 that sounds fowl ? are you sure he wasn't just caught stuffing a chicken and someone got the wrong end of the stick? You don`t normally stuff a chicken in a coop with your trousers round your ankles...
leicsmac Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 I don't think you can be selective in which topics people need to attain certain standards before having sex . Should they know stuff like the chemical symbol for sodium , the location of the hyoid , the capital of Nigeria, and the date of the battle of Crecy before they are allowed to play hide the sausage ? Absolutely. Only smart people should be permitted to have sex.
leicsmac Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 To the person who said dead people cannot give consent, I happen to know that this isn't true. Dead people can use their auras to either repel you or attract you like a magnet. On the topic of gay marriage, I think it's a step in the right direction and long overdue. I sincerely hope that the trend keeps going and more alternative sexualities become socially acceptable and legally recognised. What the clusterfvck?
Zingari Posted 8 February 2013 Posted 8 February 2013 You don`t normally stuff a chicken in a coop with your trousers round your ankles... Is that coop as in a chicken "coop" , or as in the big shop "co op" . Have you considered that the poor unfortunate man may just have had a Lord Mayoral type wardrobe malfunction . Don't be in such a hurry to judge people !!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.