Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
General Smuts

NFL 2013

Recommended Posts

Posted

Giants lol

 

They actually can't get any worse, they seriously stink.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Surely even the Vikings can beat the Giants tonight. They're priced at 8/5 so this is quite tempting

Posted

Typical. I whack a few quid on the Colts at a big price and that happens.

Lamby I wouldn't fully expect the Giants to get off the mark tonight. Vikings are terrible as well.

Posted

Typical. I whack a few quid on the Colts at a big price and that happens.

Lamby I wouldn't fully expect the Giants to get off the mark tonight. Vikings are terrible as well.

Sam Bradford also out for the season. Big Blow for the rams.
Posted

Might be whacking a few clams on the Bengals to win the bowl, they are ticking along nicely and have an amazing offense lead by Dalton and Green.

Posted

Far far too easy for the Vikings there

lol lol

Wtf? They scored 7 points all game and that from blown coverage on a punt return?

Posted

If I want to start following this, where's the best coverage and is there a Match of the Day equivalent with good highlights and minimal adverts?

Also, how terrible are the Washington Redskins? I've arbitrarily decided they're my team. Partly because their "uniforms" (see, I'm getting in to the lingo) are cool and partly because one of their players got murdered in some gangland shooting a few years ago leading them to go on an uncharacteristic winning streak in his honor.

I can get behind that. Go Redskins!

Posted

lol lol

Wtf? They scored 7 points all game and that from blown coverage on a punt return?

 

I was talking about that TD return. A team shouldn't be letting a player go that far up the field from a punt return tbh

Posted

If I want to start following this, where's the best coverage and is there a Match of the Day equivalent with good highlights and minimal adverts?

Also, how terrible are the Washington Redskins? I've arbitrarily decided they're my team. Partly because their "uniforms" (see, I'm getting in to the lingo) are cool and partly because one of their players got murdered in some gangland shooting a few years ago leading them to go on an uncharacteristic winning streak in his honor.

I can get behind that. Go Redskins!

 

As Bert says, I think Channel 4 do a programme.

 

Sean Taylor, one of many unfortunately, players of murder in the NFL as most of the players are right from the hood, can throw as much money as you want at them but they still can't resist trying to be the biggest gangster in town.

 

Plaxico Burress is still the best, managed to shoot himself by accident with a gun in his pocket.

I was talking about that TD return. A team shouldn't be letting a player go that far up the field from a punt return tbh

 

It happens, Vikings have a pretty good ST. Shame the rest of their team is just absolutely awful.

Posted

If I want to start following this, where's the best coverage and is there a Match of the Day equivalent with good highlights and minimal adverts?

Also, how terrible are the Washington Redskins? I've arbitrarily decided they're my team. Partly because their "uniforms" (see, I'm getting in to the lingo) are cool and partly because one of their players got murdered in some gangland shooting a few years ago leading them to go on an uncharacteristic winning streak in his honor.

I can get behind that. Go Redskins!

There was some sort of gang involvement in Sean Taylor's death, but he had nothing to do with that (shocking, I know, you'd think a guy that went to The U...) besides being targeted by career burglars that ****ed up their job. (That was a real shame, btw)

You might also be pleased to know that there is a campaign underway that is pretty much all and only driven by ESPN writers to get the Redskins to change their name, because, well, come on. The Redskins have vowed to never do this. Your job now is to attack the "librul media" every chance they get and always have a handy excuse available on why "Redskins" isn't racist. As an example, a fan called into a New York sports talk radio show segment on the nickname controversy and said the nickname is not offensive. When the host asked "What is a 'redskin?'" in Socratic stylee, the fan replied, "I dunno, it could be somebody with a sunburn!"

And if you like sleazy American sports team owners that extract every penny from their fans, can give fat piece of shit players a gazillion dollar contract but are too cheap to pay for a decent grounds crew causing the future of the franchise to blow out his knee, sue widows about their late husbands' season tickets, and make Nottingham Forest's media embargo seem like glasnost, you have the perfect man in Dan Snyder.

Hail to the Redskins!

P.S. MattP, Plax is definitely the funniest one--although it wasn't funny at the time, that stupid ****! The worst part about the whole thing was that Burress was wearing sweatpants at Latin Quarter... Not that Latin Quarter is the most exclusive club in the world, but I'd definitely NOT wear sweatpants there, and ESPECIALLY NOT IF I WERE HIDING A ****ING GUN.

Sadly that needs to be said about this phenomenon in the league: Aaron Hernandez.

Posted

Surely Chiefs has to go as well if Redskins does? I was told that was more offensive when I was in LA, might have been taking the piss though.

 

Weirdo's, it's a fcuking team name.

 

 

P.S. MattP, Plax is definitely the funniest one--although it wasn't funny at the time, that stupid ****! The worst part about the whole thing was that Burress was wearing sweatpants at Latin Quarter... Not that Latin Quarter is the most exclusive club in the world, but I'd definitely NOT wear sweatpants there, and ESPECIALLY NOT IF I WERE HIDING A ****ING GUN.

Sadly that needs to be said about this phenomenon in the league: Aaron Hernandez.

 

I have no idea where to start with that one. Hernandez case is a rela fcuk up.

 

Plaxico, well he's just a bit dumb isn't he, that's why he's a wide receiver. None of them are too bright. Just run fast, move and catch.

Posted

On a scale of like, beaneater to n*gger (with kike and gook somewhere in between) just how offensive IS redskin considered? Is it not so dated a term it's practically inoffensive or am I very backwards?

Posted

On a scale of like, beaneater to n*gger (with kyke and gook somewhere in between) just how offensive IS redskin considered? Is it not so dated a term it's practically inoffensive or am I very backwards?

 

I've honestly never even heard it used as a insult. And as you can imagine, I'm the sort of man that's used most and heard them all.

 

Then again I've only ever met a couple of Native Indians and they seemed to find me taking a piss near their reservation more offensive than anything I could have called them.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...