Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davelcfc100

Who wouldn't have taken 8 points from our 1st 6 games?

Recommended Posts

Guest MarshallForEngland
Posted

Only problem is that with us doing so well, the fans expectations, especially on here, seem to have risen even higher than what we expected.

 

Expectations higher than expected  lol

Posted

What's the idea of taking eight points so far got to do with anything? We had the eight points before yesterday's kick-off. The job facing us yesterday was to take something from a team with seemingly less to offer than most previous opponents yet we failed hopelessly especially in terms of our tactics and attention to detail. 

 

Some of the things were glaring. If you can't cope with a winger then the least you can do is deny him ball supply. We didn't do that. 

And if you can't cope with corners and free-kicks then the best approach is not to give them away. But we did. .

 

As for our system I really couldn't believe we went for 4-3-3 which was surely a horses-for-courses system desinged to put pressure on Manchester United's seriously shaky defence...and the only likely way we could ever win the game.

 

Four-four-two is by far our best go-to system we use and offers much better protection to the full-backs which was definitely going to be needed against Palace.

 

The other thing I'd mention is leaving Kingy out. The bloke has been one of our best and most consistent players all season with a pass success rate to be envied last time I checked and in a division when it is so important to keep the ball. Now he's on the bench. What the hell does he have to do? 

 

Yesterday was three points dropped and there's no getting away from it. We were second best tactically and individually. Of course we've had a good start. But that'll count for nothing if we're not as wound up and tactically astute for the so-called lesser matches as we are against the bigger clubs. 

Posted

What's the idea of taking eight points so far got to do with anything? We had the eight points before yesterday's kick-off. The job facing us yesterday was to take something from a team with seemingly less to offer than most previous opponents yet we failed hopelessly especially in terms of our tactics and attention to detail. 

 

Some of the things were glaring. If you can't cope with a winger then the least you can do is deny him ball supply. We didn't do that. 

And if you can't cope with corners and free-kicks then the best approach is not to give them away. But we did. .

 

As for our system I really couldn't believe we went for 4-3-3 which was surely a horses-for-courses system desinged to put pressure on Manchester United's seriously shaky defence...and the only likely way we could ever win the game.

 

Four-four-two is by far our best go-to system we use and offers much better protection to the full-backs which was definitely going to be needed against Palace.

 

The other thing I'd mention is leaving Kingy out. The bloke has been one of our best and most consistent players all season with a pass success rate to be envied last time I checked and in a division when it is so important to keep the ball. Now he's on the bench. What the hell does he have to do? 

 

Yesterday was three points dropped and there's no getting away from it. We were second best tactically and individually. Of course we've had a good start. But that'll count for nothing if we're not as wound up and tactically astute for the so-called lesser matches as we are against the bigger clubs.

I think your points are valid Tony but we are all feeling the effect of falling off cloud nine. Speaking personally, there's only one way to console my disappointment and that is to think that we are much higher up the table than we expected.
Posted

What's the idea of taking eight points so far got to do with anything? We had the eight points before yesterday's kick-off. The job facing us yesterday was to take something from a team with seemingly less to offer than most previous opponents yet we failed hopelessly especially in terms of our tactics and attention to detail. 

 

Some of the things were glaring. If you can't cope with a winger then the least you can do is deny him ball supply. We didn't do that. 

And if you can't cope with corners and free-kicks then the best approach is not to give them away. But we did. .

 

As for our system I really couldn't believe we went for 4-3-3 which was surely a horses-for-courses system desinged to put pressure on Manchester United's seriously shaky defence...and the only likely way we could ever win the game.

 

Four-four-two is by far our best go-to system we use and offers much better protection to the full-backs which was definitely going to be needed against Palace.

 

The other thing I'd mention is leaving Kingy out. The bloke has been one of our best and most consistent players all season with a pass success rate to be envied last time I checked and in a division when it is so important to keep the ball. Now he's on the bench. What the hell does he have to do? 

 

Yesterday was three points dropped and there's no getting away from it. We were second best tactically and individually. Of course we've had a good start. But that'll count for nothing if we're not as wound up and tactically astute for the so-called lesser matches as we are against the bigger clubs. 

 

It sounds like things are going badly from reading this. But they're not. They're going very, very well. All the if's you've asked are nothing to worry about as, so far, we've shown we can sort them out. They can only be major concerns if you unfairly focus on our worst game.

Posted

if we keep this form up throughout the season we will finish with around 50 points, which should be enough for the top half. And we have easier fixtures on paper to come

Posted

You know there's all sorts of exciting essays about why 'of' can / does make sense in such sentences.

 

Either way, I'd have taken 8 from 8, let alone 6. But I hope we don't take that sort of approach into the next two games!

 

Would be interested in reading them, because as far as I know 'to of' currently isn't a verb. Also, 'there are' not 'there's'.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...