Strokes Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Probably motivated by not allowing dangerous left wing attitudes towards race issues facilitate the further gang rape of children I expect. I agree it has no place in party politics though, but there's definitely a clear left right divide at play. Its just not very helpful to the debate, in the same way assuming racism is a right wing only issue.
Guest Bilo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Fvcking hell, he's determined to make a fool of himself isn't he?! I'm 30 years old, not actually single, anybody who meets me will know I'm as working class as they come, I'm a long way from 'far left,' teachers generally put in anywhere between 50-60 hours a week and I'm no different, I'm an atheist from a C of E background and a landlord giving you an old darts trophy from the cellar with Blog of the Year written on in felt tip to shut you up about your blog doesn't make you an esteemed journalist. I've taught many kids with a range of special educational needs and mental health issues so do not mock people with mental health issues, not to mention personal reasons for not wishing to mock mental health. Keep banging that drum all you like, but it's getting you nowhere. Everybody but you can see what a fool you're making of yourself.
Sir Fynwy Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 The biggest problem here is the inability of the forum moderators to apply bans to people who are willing to keep signing up with different profiles, there is almost no point in moderation in this situation.
Strokes Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 The biggest problem here is the inability of the forum moderators to apply bans to people who are willing to keep signing up with different profiles, there is almost no point in moderation in this situation.Moderators in moderation imo
Guest Bilo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 The biggest problem here is the inability of the forum moderators to apply bans to people who are willing to keep signing up with different profiles, there is almost no point in moderation in this situation. I imagine it's difficult if he keeps using different proxies. In that situation, there'll be as many alter egos as there are closed pubs in the Leicestershire area. That said, we can tell instantly when he's signed up. My money's on a new poster called The Victory in a few days.
Webbo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Moderators don't ban anyway. Tbf, he's been on the receiving of a bit of abuse too.
Strokes Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 You can blame Tony Blair for all the closed pubs tbf
Sir Fynwy Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Moderators don't ban anyway. Tbf, he's been on the receiving of a bit of abuse too. Breaking the basic rule about multiple accounts and spamming the forum constantly is ok then?
Rincewind Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 If I had more pension I would be in a pub and not reading his rubbish so its Camerons fault. Just kidding.Stayed in for the snooker. On red button now.
Guest Bilo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 If I had more pension I would be in a pub and not reading his rubbish so its Camerons fault. I blame Gove for my not being in the pub as well. Bloomin' coursework and lesson planning.
sphericalfox Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 I imagine it's difficult if he keeps using different proxies. In that situation, there'll be as many alter egos as there are closed pubs in the Leicestershire area. That said, we can tell instantly when he's signed up. My money's on a new poster called The Victory in a few days. You are assuming he has the intelligence to do that. I'm doubtful.
Buce Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 I'd hate to see him banned, tbh - he's a never-ending source of amusement.
Webbo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Breaking the basic rule about multiple accounts and spamming the forum constantly is ok then? Not really, but he's been banned 2 or 3 times already, what do you want us to do? As for spamming a few people on here push their blogs. If people can be bothered to read them it's up to them.
Guest Bilo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Who was the invisible before? Take your pick. Snooty Fox Blue Moon Blue Moon 2 Blue Moon 3 Blue Moon 4 Blue Moon 5 The Dominion Rosie O'Brien's The Richmond I think that's just the start, there may be more.....
Danno Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 I've been on here for about 4 years and don't remember him at all under any of those names
Webbo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 I've been on here for about 4 years and don't remember him at all under any of those names They don't tend to last very long.
Buce Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Take your pick. Snooty Fox Blue Moon Blue Moon 2 Blue Moon 3 Blue Moon 4 Blue Moon 5 The Dominion Rosie O'Brien's The Richmond I think that's just the start, there may be more..... The Long Stop?
Rincewind Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 I find him amusing yet annoying at the same time. The name doesn't suit though. Certainly not being invisible.
sphericalfox Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 I bet Moosey wishes he pretended to have a mental condition to pretend he's not trolling.
Guest Bilo Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 The Long Stop? Yep. Think he had a brief stint as The Imperial as well. That's 12 that I know of.
Danno Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 They don't tend to last very long.True. I wonder who this new city187 muppet is too.
Sir Fynwy Posted 19 April 2015 Posted 19 April 2015 Not really, but he's been banned 2 or 3 times already, what do you want us to do? As for spamming a few people on here push their blogs. If people can be bothered to read them it's up to them. Apply the forum rules or give up and let the forum degenerate, I know Mark has made enquiries about finding out who he is
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.