foxinsocks

Moyse has shown that Dyche is not effective

For years the trust has tried to avoid criticizing the club ( or the club has groomed the trust). It hasn't got us anywhere and the Fan engagement framework is a joke. That's why we wanted to change the trust to represent all fans amd to be unafraid to challenge the club. This is a big step...

We do want supprt for clear criticisms... The club haven't run a survey have they? I am keen to see what the response is from outside this bubble.... the leaflets and newspaper coverage aims to reach the leicestershire passive massive

But we can't say to the club ... the fans think you're pants but we can't be arsed to ask them and if we did they wouldn't bother. I get the cynism....but nothing like this has been done before and it will allow the club to be called out... esp on fan engagement and board decision making. It will drive media interest. All we are saying is give this a chance.

A big opportunity to let the club know what we think. This is a big step in changing the trust to represent the views of ALL fans.

Jamie has done his best. I am sad it ends like this.

You guys always assume the club looks at the record and potential of managers. Imo they just ask a few agents and then sign the likes of cooper or ruud

When is his contract to... what are his wage? Sell when 12mths left... did not renew

Dyche is finished after the moyse performance.

I have no idea if ruud could be good or bad. I will say he has not made the best of what he found here... but with his own lore he might be better. No idea.

He is wout faes... a spectator

Foul throw?

The fan engagement guy Hurlihy is now a barrier

Top is demonstrating that he is being taken for a fool. he can't see that he needs better help - Rudkin and Hurlihy are doing terrible jobs yet he lets them carry on

Thank you

Thanks you. I get it that some people think this is all crazy - but I don't think the council considers the anxiety that this can cause parents or residents.

I realise this is contentious - so we are just asking for the proper procedure to be followed. To demonstrate the uncertain situation: A recent meta study showed it was more probable than not that it was harmful - so you might be wrong or you could be right. So given this uncertainty, how would you feel about you kids learning next to a mast? If there is a likelihood it may turn out to be a bad idea we can avoid the problem by putting the mast 200yds down the street. See: “Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer” It says that about 3 out of every 4 papers suggest this radiation is cancerous, 3/4 say it may have an effect on fertility and 3/4 say it causes radiation sickness. It includes tests on animals living near masts (and so the effects cannot be psychosomatic.) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122011781 A piece in the BMJ said was not clear that it is safe and the rollout should be halted.

Please sign this petition asking for a proper consultation on a phone mast next to our school. Please help. In Burbage we have a new 5G phone mast right next to a primary school. For such a mast there should have been a proper consultation but the borough council failed to do this. I accept that there is plenty of debate about the safety of such but it is not ideal to have our kids sitting so close for 7 hours per day. Please take just a few seconds to sign this petition asking for the consultation to be repeated: https://www.change.org/p/halt-activation-review-decision-mast-ref-24-00689-tgdo-adj-sketchley-hill-primary-sc?recruiter=1372268008&recruited_by_id=285ef9a0-22c5-11f0-a9eb-f3054e1c7b2e&utm_source=share_petition&utm_campaign=petition_dashboard_share_modal&utm_medium=copylink we need numbers... please help

Who is his agent? Ryan Bertrand.

Thanks - I presume this situation lasts until his 17 birthday.

most of the things you mention are down to rudkin's mistake or failures. So what have we learnt: 1. never pay a player more then an acquiring club would pay (or you wont be able to sell. 2. sell if a new contract cannot be agreed with 12months on their old one remaining. (Youri's could have been sold for say 25million - so his last season cost us his wages plus £25million and we still gor relegated.) Top is unable to run a football club without the right advisors - his mistake has been not to get better advisors in. he has relied on Herlihy and rudkin despite all indications that they are very very poor. The fiscal management as been appalling. Top's inability to revise this has made him look a fool.

w does it work? can anyone suggest what kinds of clubs and offer he may get now. If he stays with us another season is he still free to take up incoming offers?

we should sell him now for whatever we can get - we cannot make a championship forward out of him

Was there any anti board chanting or banners?

Skip