Rachel threads

[Carl the Llama]

We all know this is the reason we won the league last year - and indeed avoided relegation the one before that - so I have to ask:  Why are we no longer allowed a Rachel thread?

[Charl91]

No idea. No Rachel Threads this season, and no wins either.

 

Coincidence?

[DennisNedry]

Because they were boring, tiresome, and childish?

[linemakers]

No more Rachel photos as the only ones left are the naked ones she's had taken 

[Collymore]

43 minutes ago, linemakers said:

No more Rachel photos as the only ones left are the naked ones she's had taken 

What you're telling me all this time there were naked ones available?

 

 

 

[stripeyfox]

1 hour ago, DennisNedry said:

Because they were boring, tiresome, and childish?

If this were the criteria for removing threads there'd be hardly any left...

[Jimothy]

1 hour ago, DennisNedry said:

Because they were boring, tiresome, and childish?

 

Don't open them then.

[Captain...]

There was one for Hull and the community shield, look how they turned out, maybe, just maybe her powers have gone, or maybe she didn't have any in the first place...

[Carl the Llama]

48 minutes ago, Captain... said:

There was one for Hull and the community shield, look how they turned out, maybe, just maybe her powers have gone, or maybe she didn't have any in the first place...

Didn't see one for either?  Did they get deleted too?

[DB11]

25 minutes ago, Carl the Llama said:

Didn't see one for either?  Did they get deleted too?

They got deleted at full time

[Carl the Llama]

2 minutes ago, DB11 said:

They got deleted at full time

Then it's true, the Rachel has forsaken us...

[Wymsey]

Need someone more local, like Sam Bailey.

 

Don't want to give weller54 any more sweats before games.

[Jimothy]

1 hour ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Need someone more local, like Sam Bailey.

 

Don't want to give weller54 any more sweats before games.

 

The whole idea of the Rachel thread was that we could all enjoy looking at her pictures whilst our team lost game after game on the way to inevitable relegation. With that in mind I'm not sure Sam Bailey is gonna cut it.

[ozleicester]

Can any Mod or person "in power" explain the removal of the Rachel threads? Just interested

[Wymsey]

Can one of the mods explain why around 6/7 of my posts (after 'analysis' didn't contain any abuse or over the top opinions) have been deleted today/yesterday evening?

 

I don't feel comfortable in posting now in fear it'll go with no explanation. Have got no problem with any of the mods, but feel like one of them (have one in mind) is being harsh on me in particular. Thanks.

[Jimothy]

53 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said:

Can one of the mods explain why around 6/7 of my posts (after 'analysis' didn't contain any abuse or over the top opinions) have been deleted today/yesterday evening?

 

I don't feel comfortable in posting now in fear it'll go with no explanation. Have got no problem with any of the mods, but feel like one of them (have one in mind) is being harsh on me in particular. Thanks.

 

Can a mod delete this please?

 

Just kidding Wymesy

[Carl the Llama]

Wymsewold's posts are one of the highlights of this boards.  Mods have a word with the mods.

[Soar Fox]

On 27 August 2016 at 21:11, Wymeswold fox said:

Can one of the mods explain why around 6/7 of my posts (after 'analysis' didn't contain any abuse or over the top opinions) have been deleted today/yesterday evening?

 

I don't feel comfortable in posting now in fear it'll go with no explanation. Have got no problem with any of the mods, but feel like one of them (have one in mind) is being harsh on me in particular. Thanks.

Which one do you reckon Wymsey?

[Guest Mee-9]

I don't think we should have mods.

 

I think we should just descend into chaos, eat our own sh*t, stare at pictures of the countdown lass, objectify women and read 20 new topics a day on why we should swap the kop with the family stand. 

[Bayfox]

is this the new rachel thread?