Jimothy Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Webbo said: Don't kid yourself. So your argument against my previous post Is............?
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Facecloth said: So your argument against my previous post Is............? Saying "certain posters" is cowardly. If you're going to accuse people, be honest and say to their face. don't hide behind words.
Jimothy Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Webbo said: Saying "certain posters" is cowardly. If you're going to accuse people, be honest and say to their face. don't hide behind words. So your argument against my previous post Is........? You just said don't hold my breath that you did agree with me then offer no counter argument just bring up the fact I didn't name the posters (which I have now)
Carl the Llama Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Webbo said: I don't have a vendetta against you Carl. Condemn people when they do something wrong, not for what you assume they think. It's difficult to believe that when no other poster challenges or misinterprets my comments anywhere near as much as you do. It's like you're sat there waiting for a notification that I've posted and whenever one pops up you just select a handful of words from the comment and formulate your response based on that.
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 3 minutes ago, Facecloth said: So your argument against my previous post Is........? You just said don't hold my breath that you did agree with me then offer no counter argument just bring up the fact I didn't name the posters (which I have now) Quote I don't often post in any of the terrorist thread, like you said you didn't. But and I'll spell it out simply. CERTAIN. POSTERS. DO. Get it? You can't deduce anything from me not condemning this but you can deduce something from certain people who quickly condemn other things. Understand? Sounds like a statement rather than an argument, which bit did you want me to argue with.
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 4 minutes ago, Carl the Llama said: It's difficult to believe that when no other poster challenges or misinterprets my comments anywhere near as much as you do. It's like you're sat there waiting for a notification that I've posted and whenever one pops up you just select a handful of words from the comment and formulate your response based on that. I think you're being a little paranoid.
Jimothy Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 1 minute ago, Webbo said: Sounds like a statement rather than an argument, which bit did you want me to argue with. The bit you said you didn't agree with
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Facecloth said: The bit you said you didn't agree with Which bit was that?
Jimothy Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Webbo said: Which bit was that? Dunno, you said you didn't agree, told me not to hold my breath that you accepted my point.
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 1 minute ago, Facecloth said: Dunno, you said you didn't agree, told me not to hold my breath that you accepted my point. No, never said it.
Jimothy Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Webbo said: No, never said it. Sorry it was don't kid yourself, same principle. And you claim you're not a troll. That was classic troĺling avoiding the arguement over stupid pedantry.
leicsmac Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Ummm...sorry Webs, but I have to ask, straight up. Is there a difference on here, in your opinion, between reactions to an event like this and to Islamic extremist events? And does the lack of reaction from the White House to this event bother you at all?
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 1 minute ago, Facecloth said: Sorry it was don't kid yourself, same principle. And you claim you're not a troll. That was classic troĺling avoiding the arguement over stupid pedantry. I'm the one who's always being accused of not reading post. You'll notice I didn't stick a on the end of my post either. Classic trolling.
Carl the Llama Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 12 minutes ago, Webbo said: I think you're being a little paranoid. I might be paranoid but that doesn't mean you aren't out to get me.
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 1 minute ago, leicsmac said: Ummm...sorry Webs, but I have to ask, straight up. Is there a difference on here, in your opinion, between reactions to an event like this and to Islamic extremist events? And does the lack of reaction from the White House to this event bother you at all? Tbh I've barely watched the news this weekend and I usually only skim read this thread as it's usually the same old, same old. I'd guess a lot of people don't bother at all for the same reason. If somebody had started a thread about it, it might have got more of a response.
Carl the Llama Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 2 minutes ago, Webbo said: I'm the one who's always being accused of not reading post. You'll notice I didn't stick a on the end of my post either. Classic trolling. You're still avoiding his question...
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Carl the Llama said: You're still avoiding his question... What question .
leicsmac Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, Webbo said: Tbh I've barely watched the news this weekend and I usually only skim read this thread as it's usually the same old, same old. I'd guess a lot of people don't bother at all for the same reason. If somebody had started a thread about it, it might have got more of a response. Fair enough. I don't get the apathy towards the Trump administration from a decent sized portion of this forum, though; not when it can affect the UK and also when other governments cop more flak despite being much less powerful (Venezuela, anyone?) I'd appreciate an answer to the questions above if you'd be so good, though.
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 Just now, leicsmac said: Fair enough. I don't get the apathy towards the Trump administration from a decent sized portion of this forum, though; not when it can affect the UK and also when other governments cop more flak despite being much less powerful (Venezuela, anyone?) I'd appreciate an answer to the questions above if you'd be so good, though. I was just about to edit my post when you replied. All political violence is despicable, I have no sympathy with any group who try to impose their views on people by force rather than the ballot box.
leicsmac Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 1 minute ago, Webbo said: I was just about to edit my post when you replied. All political violence is despicable, I have no sympathy with any group who try to impose their views on people by force rather than the ballot box. *nods* I agree. And in light of that, is the reaction of the White House to this act a little worrying to you? Do you think the reactions in this forum are a bit different to an Islamic attack?
Strokes Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 I've been completely absorbed by footie this weekend and didn't even know of this atrocity until I just read this thread. Evil ****ers everywhere that seem to think that their viewpoint gives them the right to inflict death on people who think different. No better than Isis, absolute cùnt.
Carl the Llama Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 11 minutes ago, Webbo said: What question . The one in bold referencing the quote at the start of this exchange (I know he misused the word "previous" but it's obvious what he meant): 54 minutes ago, Facecloth said: I don't often post in any of the terrorist thread, like you said you didn't. But and I'll spell it out simply. CERTAIN. POSTERS. DO. Get it? You can't deduce anything from me not condemning this but you can deduce something from certain people who quickly condemn other things. Understand? 52 minutes ago, Webbo said: Can we stop with this certain posters crap? Just say who you mean. 41 minutes ago, Facecloth said: Oh so now you understand but rather than just agree or leave it you have argue further and demand names. So keen are you to be right that even when you accept my point you still argue it Ok I'll give you one name at least. If this had been a Muslim attack MattP would have been over it like a fly on shit. There's three or four others who aren't quite of Mattp's level of fame on here who would too, and I could get the names if it wasn't quarter to 11 at night I was planning on some kip. 38 minutes ago, Webbo said: Don't kid yourself. 37 minutes ago, Facecloth said: So your argument against my previous post Is............? As in he'd like to know your argument against the idea that anything can be inferred from certain posters with previous for indignation against an entire section of society within hours when this kind of event is perpetrated by Muslims choosing to remain silent now. You seem to be directly saying that you disagree with that notion when you said don't kid yourself.
leicsmac Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 2 minutes ago, Strokes said: I've been completely absorbed by footie this weekend and didn't even know of this atrocity until I just read this thread. Evil ****ers everywhere that seem to think that their viewpoint gives them the right to inflict death on people who think different. No better than Isis, absolute cùnt. Fair play.
Webbo Posted 13 August 2017 Posted 13 August 2017 1 minute ago, leicsmac said: *nods* I agree. And in light of that, is the reaction of the White House to this act a little worrying to you? Do you think the reactions in this forum are a bit different to an Islamic attack? If it had happened in this country then it would have had a bigger response and as I said this thread tends to be just a series of "something bad's happened, it's all Trump's fault" which gets a bit tedious so it's probably not been noticed as much as if there had been a specific thread.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.