yorkie1999 Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 Just now, Lestoh said: Grammar ?? What's wrong with fuller
Lestoh Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 5 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said: ?? What's wrong with fuller "more full", Google what a fuller is
yorkie1999 Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 3 minutes ago, Lestoh said: "more full", Google what a fuller is http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/260896/how-can-something-be-fuller-or-the-fullest as in "my testicles were fuller last night than were this morning." You see, if your hard drive was as full as mine, you'd know that.
Lestoh Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 7 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said: http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/260896/how-can-something-be-fuller-or-the-fullest as in "my testicles were fuller last night than were this morning." You see, if your hard drive was as full as mine, you'd know that. That's a user-submitted definition that doesn't actually exist, sorry to burst your bubble
yorkie1999 Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 11 minutes ago, Lestoh said: That's a user-submitted definition that doesn't actually exist, sorry to burst your bubble Well, i was never that good at the grammatical side of English but, i'm fairly certain that to describe something being more full, the correct word is fuller. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fuller
Lestoh Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 20 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said: Well, i was never that good at the grammatical side of English but, i'm fairly certain that to describe something being more full, the correct word is fuller. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fuller I think that link answers your question. We're jacking this lad's thread anyway, let's dip
Charlie Thacker Posted 3 April 2017 Author Posted 3 April 2017 2 hours ago, sm1 said: Are you the rugby player of the same name. I am not a rugby player, no
Renart Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 1 hour ago, yorkie1999 said: Well, i was never that good at the grammatical side of English but, i'm fairly certain that to describe something being more full, the correct word is fuller. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fuller I am afraid that 'fuller' as an adjective of comparison is not grammatically correct. It is used idiomatically in speech and does find its way into some writing but it really should be 'more full'. It is one of those things that you see and hear all the time and is generally accepted but the real test is whether it finds its way into the OED, which it is never likely to do. I wouldn't worry about it too much unless you are writing for the Guardian or marking coursework for students of English Language. This is a forum.
yorkie1999 Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 22 minutes ago, Renart said: I am afraid that 'fuller' as an adjective of comparison is not grammatically correct. It is used idiomatically in speech and does find its way into some writing but it really should be 'more full'. It is one of those things that you see and hear all the time and is generally accepted but the real test is whether it finds its way into the OED, which it is never likely to do. I wouldn't worry about it too much unless you are writing for the Guardian or marking coursework for students of English Language. This is a forum. I wasn't worried, i was sticking up for older people, until the grammar police decided to turn up.
Carl the Llama Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 48 minutes ago, Renart said: I am afraid that 'fuller' as an adjective of comparison is not grammatically correct. It is used idiomatically in speech and does find its way into some writing but it really should be 'more full'. It is one of those things that you see and hear all the time and is generally accepted but the real test is whether it finds its way into the OED, which it is never likely to do. I wouldn't worry about it too much unless you are writing for the Guardian or marking coursework for students of English Language. This is a forum. Thank you for giving us a fuller understanding of the word.
FraserSorensen Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 2 minutes ago, Carl the Llama said: Thank you for giving us a fuller understanding of the word. I think you mean more fuller
Izzy Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 @HighPeakFox - sort this fuller business out please old chap. Cheers
StanSP Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 i find this a bit more than disturbing but today you've made it in to my Football Manager game....
bovril Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 6 hours ago, Swarles Barkley said: Just out of curiousity, why 1 to 11, not 1-10. my OCD is bugging me to know This one goes to 11.
Great Boos Up Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 Could'nt finish that. You lot must be much cleverer than me.
yorkie1999 Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 1 hour ago, Great Boos Up said: Could'nt finish that. You lot must be much cleverer than me. I'd shift that apostrophe if I were you, before someone jumps down your neck
Trav Le Bleu Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 2 hours ago, FraserSorensen said: I think you mean more fuller Genuinely made me In any case, surely full is an absolute; either one is full or one is not. So you could be closer to being full, but not more full. Then again, if we describe empty as being a total lack of substance, then, other than a vacuum, indeed, a vacuous space, then very few things in life are truly empty. They are merely closer to being empty.
yorkie1999 Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 3 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Genuinely made me In any case, surely full is an absolute; either one is full or one is not. So you could be closer to being full, but not more full. Then again, if we describe empty as being a total lack of substance, then, other than a vacuum, indeed, a vacuous space, then very few things in life are truly empty. They are merely closer to being empty. I wouldn't say that, some of the promises from the birds I used to try and chat up were pretty empty.
The Blur Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 3 hours ago, StanSP said: i find this a bit more than disturbing but today you've made it in to my Football Manager game.... Football Manager has got his concentration stats spot on judging by the 51-59 years old age group omission in the survey
FraserSorensen Posted 3 April 2017 Posted 3 April 2017 15 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Ricardo. Ricardo More Full I'm really getting the hang of this now.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.