Bans

[Brainy]

6 hours ago, FIF said:

Yeah, but when will the ban end?

Maybe Mark has suspended Foxestalk Parliament

[Guest]

16 hours ago, Walkers said:

Maybe Mark has suspended Foxestalk Parliament

you're saying that Mark has prorougued me? I thought I'd been walking strangely lately.

[lifted*fox]

it's fair enough that i'm banned from general chat (thank **** tbh, the serious lack of IQ on display in the brexit thread recently would have my wind-up mechanism working over-drive) BUT the 10 post a day limit across the rest of the forum is ****ing ridiculous quite frankly.

[RoboFox]

2 hours ago, lifted*fox said:

it's fair enough that i'm banned from general chat (thank **** tbh, the serious lack of IQ on display in the brexit thread recently would have my wind-up mechanism working over-drive) BUT the 10 post a day limit across the rest of the forum is ****ing ridiculous quite frankly.

What did you do? 

[lifted*fox]

i have a way with words that ruffles the feathers of the 'right' / 'brexiteer' crowd in the politics thread. 

 

it's my own fault, as I said before; can't help winding the dummies up. 

 

glorious morning this morning I might add, proroguing parliament unlawful / johnson lying to the queen / guilty of spending £125k to get noshed off by some tech bird from america. 

 

it's all falling apart - lots of embarrassed posters you would assume now they've been found to be supporting / arguing in favour of someone and something that goes directly against our sovereignty / laws which they claim to love so much.

 

simply glorious. 

[purpleronnie]

Just now, lifted*fox said:

i have a way with words that ruffles the feathers of the 'right' / 'brexiteer' crowd in the politics thread. 

 

it's my own fault, as I said before; can't help winding the dummies up. 

 

glorious morning this morning I might add, proroguing parliament unlawful / johnson lying to the queen / guilty of spending £125k to get noshed off by some tech bird from america. 

 

it's all falling apart - lots of embarrassed posters you would assume now they've been found to be supporting / arguing in favour of someone and something that goes directly against our sovereignty / laws which they claim to love so much.

 

simply glorious. 

Not sure it will make any difference though.

[lifted*fox]

1 minute ago, purpleronnie said:

Not sure it will make any difference though.

 

small wins mate - small wins. 

 

and no, no difference probably - you've still got the same old names trying to defend it.

 

it's hit peak irony levels now

 

[Guest]

21 hours ago, RoboFox said:

What did you do? 

Very few people banned actually know why they were banned. They are not informed of a reason, and their actions are mirrored by others who are not banned. Now it seems we are not informed of a period of time either.

 

Only the mainman can give you the answers you seek and sometimes he is as silent as a stone.

[RoboFox]

8 minutes ago, FIF said:

Very few people banned actually know why they were banned. They are not informed of a reason, and their actions are mirrored by others who are not banned. Now it seems we are not informed of a period of time either.

 

Only the mainman can give you the answers you seek and sometimes he is as silent as a stone.

Ah. Well in 5 years of posting, I have yet to feel the sharp stinging of a mod's naughty stick against my arse cheeks.

 

I try not to post in the Brexit thread for that reason. I found myself deleting several replies to some of the divs in there before hitting the "post" button. It's really hard not to just call a spade a spade, sometimes.

 

 

[lifted*fox]

5 minutes ago, RoboFox said:

It's really hard not to just call a spade a spade, sometimes.

 

tell me about it 

[Innovindil]

2 hours ago, FIF said:

Very few people banned actually know why they were banned. They are not informed of a reason, and their actions are mirrored by others who are not banned. Now it seems we are not informed of a period of time either.

 

Only the mainman can give you the answers you seek and sometimes he is as silent as a stone.

People running around gen chat literally calling people cvnts and I'm banned for winding up Facecloth. It's priceless really. 

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Innovindil said:

People running around gen chat literally calling people cvnts and I'm banned for winding up Facecloth. It's priceless really. 

 

That is something I find most strange. I've been called that myself - you're probably surprised to hear  - no ban for the perp. How can language like that be appreciated by our sponsors?

[Leicester_Loyal]

On 21/09/2019 at 08:57, FIF said:

you're saying that Mark has prorougued me? I thought I'd been walking strangely lately.

If you take it to the supreme court you'd probably be let back on

 

2 hours ago, Innovindil said:

People running around gen chat literally calling people cvnts and I'm banned for winding up Facecloth. It's priceless really. 

It's not hard to reel him in

[Jimothy]

1 hour ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

If you take it to the supreme court you'd probably be let back on

 

It's not hard to reel him in

Grow up.

[Leicester_Loyal]

40 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

Grow up.

LIghten up man, it was obviously a joke

[Jimothy]

1 minute ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

LIghten up man, it was obviously a joke

Yes you are

[lifted*fox]

oosh

[Leicester_Loyal]

6 minutes ago, Facecloth said:

Yes you are

Wipe the tears away and put the claws away

[Jimothy]

4 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

Wipe the tears away and put the claws away

What tears? 

 

Btw you've openly admitted to purposely trying to wind a fellow poster up, that's surely worth a ban, as per forum rules. Hope a mod see it, 

[Leicester_Loyal]

Just now, Facecloth said:

What tears? 

 

Btw you've openly admitted to purposely trying to wind a fellow poster up, that's surely worth a ban, as per forum rules. Hope a mod see it, 

 

I hope they ban you for being a sensitive little soul. You weren't asking for bans when you were sending me abusive posts though were you?

[Jimothy]

Just now, Leicester_Loyal said:

 

I hope they ban you for being a sensitive little soul. You weren't asking for bans when you were sending me abusive posts though were you?

You deserved it for purposely trying to wind a fellow poster up. I didn't get one so obviously someone agreed 

[Leicester_Loyal]

Just now, Facecloth said:

You deserved it for purposely trying to wind a fellow poster up. I didn't get one so obviously someone agreed 

Who said I have ever wound you up? It was a different poster who admitted to it, I just said you were easy to reel in as you get wound up easily?

 

However, you've just admitted to posting abusive messages towards me, so that's surely worth a ban, as per the forum rules. When the mods see it

[Jimothy]

2 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

Who said I have ever wound you up? It was a different poster who admitted to it, I just said you were easy to reel in as you get wound up easily?

 

However, you've just admitted to posting abusive messages towards me, so that's surely worth a ban, as per the forum rules. When the mods see it

By saying I'm easy to reel in, you're admitting you tried 

 

I'm bored of you now, I'm putting you on ignore like I should have done a whlle ago. You offer nothing to the forum. You know what you do, you post nothing posts to push the buttons of people who disagree with you. You never make a valid point.

[Leicester_Loyal]

1 minute ago, Facecloth said:

By saying I'm easy to reel in, you're admitting you tried 

 

I'm bored of you now, I'm putting you on ignore like I should have done a whlle ago. You offer nothing to the forum. You know what you do, you post nothing posts to push the buttons of people who disagree with you. You never make a valid point.

Cheerio Facecloth, I will miss you my friend.

[Countryfox]

 

All done ? ....