FoxinNotts Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 9 minutes ago, Haywood_6 said: It should be no more than 2 years. But I'd find it hard to argue with signing him. 18 goals as a midfielder is tremendous. Think all of our Central Midfielders plus Daka and Ayew combined might struggle to get that It'll never be less than 3 years. 2 years is not attractive enough to any player under the age of 35
LCFCCKEANO Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Wouldn’t be angry with it, starter for a year or two then back up after that
slymunn Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Long term could be three years, with an option of a fourth. Sounds alright after the last couple of seasons he's had.
RedSoxUK Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Was rumoured to have been offered this anyway wasn't he? My impression was yeah, we'll ave you, play as an 8, work alongside Slippy Skipp or Wonky Winks because Soumare is ****ing off. Would imagine we need to get rid of Ndidi or Soumare for this to happen.
Jonezy Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Josh Brownhill sounds like a solid option, but not for a long term bumper deal. Please let us learn at some point. 1
FoxinNotts Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 5 minutes ago, RedSoxUK said: Was rumoured to have been offered this anyway wasn't he? My impression was yeah, we'll ave you, play as an 8, work alongside Slippy Skipp or Wonky Winks because Soumare is ****ing off. Would imagine we need to get rid of Ndidi or Soumare for this to happen. This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits
Jonezy Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Just now, FoxinNotts said: This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits Because our wage bill is already out of control.
RedSoxUK Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits What if we don't shift Ndidi or Soumare.
FLAN Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 6 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits Not enough seats in the dressing room 1
Chief Keef Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 BEK and Brownhill as 8s with Winks behind would dominate this league 3
moore_94 Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 15 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits Can only register 25 senior players and we can’t afford to have players sat around not able to play
FrankieADZ Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 1 minute ago, moore_94 said: if we got £5mil(basically what we paid) Id be happy with that in all honesty since hes got a year left
-sodapop Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 1 minute ago, moore_94 said: It's gotten to the point where while I have about ten players I'd rather get shot of before JJ, if we can get a fee for him we probably need to do it 1
FoxinNotts Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 7 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Can only register 25 senior players and we can’t afford to have players sat around not able to play Appreciated, This can be sorted out after we get the players in we want. We shouldn't need to adhere to a one in one out policy
FoxinNotts Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 21 minutes ago, RedSoxUK said: What if we don't shift Ndidi or Soumare. We don't literally have to replace midfielder with midfielder. It's about finance of the club over the whole piece. We use this one-in one-out thing to hide behind, when it suits us
Lesta2014 Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: Appreciated, This can be sorted out after we get the players in we want. We shouldn't need to adhere to a one in one out policy Is of thought he was on more than 30k?
FoxinNotts Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 26 minutes ago, Jonezy said: Because our wage bill is already out of control. We can get this under control over the period of the transfer window. We don't need to wait until one goes to get another in
Ric Flair Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 I don't see Brownhill coming here. Burnley were offering him decent wages and he wanted another challenge. I suspect he's targeting Rangers/Celtic and European football or even going abroad.
Haywood_6 Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Sell. He's a headless chicken who cost us a massive amount of points last season
FoxinNotts Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 1 minute ago, Lesta2014 said: Is of thought he was on more than 30k? don't know
kingpowerout Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 JJ been a good servant but we've seen the best of him. If he moves on then good luck to the lad.
Scotch Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 7 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: Appreciated, This can be sorted out after we get the players in we want. We shouldn't need to adhere to a one in one out policy ...and if those outgoings fall through?
kingpowerout Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 Has Rudkin finally topped up his credit and picking up his phone? Feels like rumours are coming in thick and fast now
Guest Mickyblueeyes Posted 31 July 2025 Posted 31 July 2025 https://x.com/sportspeteo/status/1950849157108826288?s=46 Sell, sell, sell.
Recommended Posts