Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Haywood_6 said:

It should be no more than 2 years. But I'd find it hard to argue with signing him. 18 goals as a midfielder is tremendous. Think all of our Central Midfielders plus Daka and Ayew combined might struggle to get that  lol

It'll never be less than 3 years. 2 years is not attractive enough to any player under the age of 35

Posted

Was rumoured to have been offered this anyway wasn't he?

 

My impression was yeah, we'll ave you, play as an 8, work alongside Slippy Skipp or Wonky Winks because Soumare is ****ing off.

 

Would imagine we need to get rid of Ndidi or Soumare for this to happen.

Posted

Josh Brownhill sounds like a solid option, but not for a long term bumper deal. Please let us learn at some point.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, RedSoxUK said:

Was rumoured to have been offered this anyway wasn't he?

 

My impression was yeah, we'll ave you, play as an 8, work alongside Slippy Skipp or Wonky Winks because Soumare is ****ing off.

 

Would imagine we need to get rid of Ndidi or Soumare for this to happen.

This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits

Posted
Just now, FoxinNotts said:

This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits

Because our wage bill is already out of control.

Posted
2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits

What if we don't shift Ndidi or Soumare.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits

Not enough seats in the dressing room 

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

This is what pisses me off. Why do we (or any team) need to move players out, before we bring 'free transfer' players in? I don't get it! It's just an accounting excuse to hide behind, when it suits

Can only register 25 senior players and we can’t afford to have players sat around not able to play

Posted
1 minute ago, moore_94 said:

 

It's gotten to the point where while I have about ten players I'd rather get shot of before JJ, if we can get a fee for him we probably need to do it

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Can only register 25 senior players and we can’t afford to have players sat around not able to play

Appreciated, This can be sorted out after we get the players in we want. We shouldn't need to adhere to a one in one out policy

Posted
21 minutes ago, RedSoxUK said:

What if we don't shift Ndidi or Soumare.

 

 

We don't literally have to replace midfielder with midfielder. It's about finance of the club over the whole piece. We use this one-in one-out thing to hide behind, when it suits us

Posted
2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Appreciated, This can be sorted out after we get the players in we want. We shouldn't need to adhere to a one in one out policy

Is of thought he was on more than 30k? 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Jonezy said:

Because our wage bill is already out of control.

We can get this under control over the period of the transfer window. We don't need to wait until one goes to get another in

Posted

I don't see Brownhill coming here. Burnley were offering him decent wages and he wanted another challenge. I suspect he's targeting Rangers/Celtic and European football or even going abroad. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Appreciated, This can be sorted out after we get the players in we want. We shouldn't need to adhere to a one in one out policy

...and if those outgoings fall through? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...